Abstract
The da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive) is the only commercially available robotic system. It consists of three components: the operating console, the vision stack, and the robotic cart supporting the robotic arms. The operating console is remotely situated from the operating table and is where the surgeon sits to control the robotic arms and instruments. A pseudo-three-dimensional (3-D) operative view is provided by a binocular imaging system. Movements of the robotic arms and instruments are controlled by the surgeon’s fingers in the master controls and through a series of foot pedals. The robotic cart supports a laparoscopic camera and two (da Vinci) or three (da Vinci-S, da Vinci-Si) robotic arms. This system is ideally suited to operating within the abdomen. Its advantages over conventional laparoscopy include a stable camera platform under direct surgeon control, a 3-D operative field, intuitive instrument handling with 6-degrees of freedom and an ergonomic operating position for the surgeon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(2):233–41. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1313-6.
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(12):1689–94. doi:10.1097/01.dcr.0000037657.78153.a8; discussion 95-6.
Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(12):1633–9. doi:10.1097/01.dcr.0000098941.42470.d9.
Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(1):117–9. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9.
Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, Borchert U, Rueckert JC, Mueller JM. Computer-assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the Da Vinci system: our first experiences. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(9):1820–7. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0121-x.
Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(11):1627–32. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9334-0.
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. Totally robotic right colectomy: a preliminary case series and an overview of the literature. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: IJMRCAS. 2011. doi:10.1002/rcs.404.
Huettner F, Pacheco PE, Doubet JL, Ryan MJ, Dynda DI, Crawford DL. One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies–an outcome and technical update. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1195–204. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1549-z.
Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Choi WH, Ryuk JP. Robot-assisted right colectomy with lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(5):e271–6. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826581bd.
Witkiewicz W, Zawadzki M, Rzaca M, Obuszko Z, Czarnecki R, Turek J, et al. Robot-assisted right colectomy: surgical technique and review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne. 2013;8(3):253–7. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2011.33761.
D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(11):2856–62. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1175-0.
Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, Marecik S, Park J, Abcarian H. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg. 2010;34(8):1954–8. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0591-4.
Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL. Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(11):1713–8. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0771-8.
deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(7):1000–6. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d32096.
Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(10):1701–8. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y.
Luca F, Ghezzi TL, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Pozzi S, Radice D et al. Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: IJMRCAS. 2011. doi:10.1002/rcs.398.
Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(9):1219–26. doi:10.1002/bjs.8841.
Ostrowitz MB, Eschete D, Zemon H, DeNoto G. Robotic-assisted single-incision right colectomy: early experience. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: IJMRCAS. 2009;5(4):465–70. doi:10.1002/rcs.281.
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Caprili G, Di Candio G, Boggi U, Mosca F. Robotic right colectomy using the Da Vinci Single-Site(R) platform: case report. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: IJMRCAS. 2013;9(3):258–61. doi:10.1002/rcs.1488.
Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960). 2009;144(10):961–9. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gossedge, G., Jayne, D. (2015). Robotic Technique for Right Colectomy. In: Kim, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J. (eds) Surgery for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1893-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1893-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1892-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1893-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)