Skip to main content

Historical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Options in the Management of the Open Abdomen

Abstract

Few advances have had a major impact on acute care and trauma surgery as much as current management of the open abdomen. Sometimes called “laparostomy,” the concept of leaving an abdomen open after surgery is not new. E.C. Wendt noted the reduced urinary flow in the presence of abdominal hypertension as early as 1876. When surgeons of yesteryear operated on peritoneal patients, they often were concerned about the “enormous pressure increase that often precluded abdominal closure.” Marey in 1863 and Henricus in 1890 commented on the adverse effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure. In 1911, Emerson introduced his readers to a series of elegant experiments with the statement that “pressure conditions which exist within the peritoneal cavity had received insufficient attention.” Baggot, an Irish anesthetist, suggested that forcing distended bowel back into the abdominal cavity of limited size might kill the patient from abdominal wound dehiscence (“abdominal blowout”) and coined the term acute tension pneumoperitoneum in 1951. Despite all these condemnations of closing an abdomen under tension, the practice continued well into the late twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aprahamian C, Wittmann DH, Bergstein JM, Quebbeman EJ. Temporary abdominal closure TAC) for planned relaparotomy (etappenlavage) in trauma. J Trauma 1990;30(6):719–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arthurs Z, Kjorstad R, Mullenix P, Rush RM Jr, Sebesta J, Beekley A. The use of damagecontrol principles for penetrating pelvic battlefield trauma. Am J Surg. 2006;191:604–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bose SM, Kalra M, Sandhu NP. Open management of septic abdomen by Marlex mesh zipper. Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61(5):385–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Braslow BM, Stawicki SP. What is abdominal compartment syndrome and how should it be managed? In: Neligan PJ, Deutschman CS (eds). Evidence-based practice of critical care. Philadelphia: Sounders Elsevier; 2010, pp 573–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Broomé A, Hansson L, Lundgren F, Smedberg S. Open treatment of abdominal septic catastrophies. World J Surg. 1983;7:792–6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, Martin RR, Mattox KL, Jordan GL Jr. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg. 1992;215:476–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn SM, Burns GA, Sawyer MD, Tolomeo C, Milner KA, Spector S. Esmarch closure of laparotomy incisions in unstable trauma patients. J Trauma 1995;39(5):978–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuesta MA, Doblas M, Castafieda L, Bengoechea E. Sequential abdominal reexploration with the zipper technique. World J Surg. 1991;15(1):74–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duff JH, Moffat J. Abdominal sepsis managed by leaving abdomen open. Surgery 1981;90(4):774–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feliciano DV, Burch JM. Towel clips, silos, and heroic forms of wound closure. Adv Trauma Crit Care 1991;6:231–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fietsam R Jr, Villalba M, Glover JL, Clark K. Intra-abdominal compartment syndrome as a complication of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Surg. 1989;55(6):396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fox VJ, Miller J, Nix AM. Temporary abdominal closure using an i.v. bag silo for severe trauma. AORN J. 1999;69:530–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Sabrido JL, Tallado JM, Christou NV, et al. Treatment of severe intra-abdominal sepsis and/or necrotic foci by an “open-abdomen” approach. Zipper and zipper-mesh techniques Arch Surg. 1988;123(2):152–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hedderich GS, Wexler MJ, McLean AP, Meakins JL. The septic abdomen: open management with Marlex mesh with a zipper. Surgery 1986;99(4):399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. Planned reoperation for severe trauma. Ann Surg. 1995;222:3–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E, Cue JI, Mondy JS, Hawkins ML. Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg. 2004;188:301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingram WL, Salomone JP, Nicholas JM, Rozycki GS. Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg. 2001;182:670–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Joglar F, Agosto E, Marrero D, et al. Dynamic retention suture closure: modified Bogotá bag approach. J Surg Res. 2010;162(2):274–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Mizrahi S. Use of the “Bogota bag” for temporary abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis. Am Surg. 2007;73(3):249–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leguit P Jr. Zip-closure of the abdomen. Neth J Surg. 1982;34(1):40–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattox K. Introduction, background, and future projections of damage control surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(4):753–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris JA Jr, Eddy VA, Blinman TA, Rutherford EJ, Sharp KW. The staged celiotomy for trauma. Issues in unpacking and reconstruction. Ann Surg. 1993;217:576–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mughal MM, Bancewicz J, Irving MH. “Laparostomy”: a technique for the management of intractable intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg. 1986;73(4):253–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogilvie WH. The late complications of abdominal war wounds. Lancet 1940;2:253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogilvie WH. Surgical lessons of war applied to civil practice. Br Med J. 1945;1(4400): 619–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rotondo MF, Zonies DH. The damage control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:761–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schein M, Saadia R, Decker GG. The open management of the septic abdomen. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986a;163(6):587–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schein M, Saadia R, Jamieson JR, Decker GA. The “sandwich technique” in the management of the open abdomen. Br J Surg. 1986b;73(5):369–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shapiro MB, Jenkins DH, Schwab CW, Rotondo MF. Damage control: collective review. J Trauma 2000;49:969–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Steinberg D. On leaving the peritoneal cavity open in acute generalized suppurative peritonitis. Am J Surg. 1979;137(2):216–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stone HH, Fabian TC, Turkleson ML, Jurkiewicz MJ. Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Ann Surg 1981;193:612–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM, Edmiston CE, Frantzides CT, Quebbeman EJ, Condon RE. A burr-like device to facilitate temporary abdominal closure in planned multiple laparotomies. Eur J Surg. 1993;159(2):75–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firas G. Madbak MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madbak, F., Lawless, R. (2015). Historical Perspective. In: Madbak, F., Dangleben, D. (eds) Options in the Management of the Open Abdomen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1827-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1827-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1826-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1827-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics