Abstract
The most influential theoretical account in time psychophysics assumes the existence of a unitary internal clock based on neural counting. The distinct timing hypothesis, on the other hand, suggests an automatic timing mechanism for processing of durations in the sub-second range and a cognitively controlled timing mechanism for processing of durations in the range of seconds. Although several psychophysical approaches can be applied for identifying the internal structure of interval timing in the second and sub-second range, the existing data provide a puzzling picture of rather inconsistent results. In the present chapter, we introduce confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to further elucidate the internal structure of interval timing performance in the sub-second and second range. More specifically, we investigated whether CFA would rather support the notion of a unitary timing mechanism or of distinct timing mechanisms underlying interval timing in the sub-second and second range, respectively. The assumption of two distinct timing mechanisms which are completely independent of each other was not supported by our data. The model assuming a unitary timing mechanism underlying interval timing in both the sub-second and second range fitted the empirical data much better. Eventually, we also tested a third model assuming two distinct, but functionally related mechanisms. The correlation between the two latent variables representing the hypothesized timing mechanisms was rather high and comparison of fit indices indicated that the assumption of two associated timing mechanisms described the observed data better than only one latent variable. Models are discussed in the light of the existing psychophysical and neurophysiological data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Grondin S. Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72:561–82.
Rammsayer T, Ulrich R. Counting models of temporal discrimination. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8:270–7.
Killeen PB, Fetterman JG. A behavioral theory of timing. Psychol Rev. 1988;95:274–95.
Rammsayer TH, Ulrich R. Elaborative rehearsal of nontemporal information interferes with temporal processing of durations in the range of seconds but not milliseconds. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011;137:127–33.
Allan LG, Kristofferson AB. Psychophysical theories of duration discrimination. Percept Psychophys. 1974;16:26–34.
Creelman CD. Human discrimination of auditory duration. J Acoust Soc Am. 1962;34:582–93.
Gibbon J. Ubiquity of scalar timing with a Poisson clock. J Math Psychol. 1992;36:283–93.
Grondin S. From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:22–44.
Killeen PB, Weiss NA. Optimal timing and the Weber function. Psychol Rev. 1987;94:455–68.
Treisman M. Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychol Monogr. 1963;77:1–31.
Treisman M, Faulkner A, Naish PLN, Brogan D. The internal clock: evidence for a temporal oscillator underlying time perception with some estimates of its characteristic frequency. Perception. 1990;19:705–43.
Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:279–325.
Allan LG, Kristofferson AB. Judgments about the duration of brief stimuli. Percept Psychophys. 1974;15:434–40.
Lewis PA, Miall RC. The precision of temporal judgement: milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1897–905.
Gibbon J, Malapani C, Dale CL, Gallistel C. Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997;7:170–84.
Rammsayer TH. Experimental evidence for different timing mechanisms underlying temporal discrimination. In: Masin SC, editor. Fechner Day 96 Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics Padua, Italy: The International Society for Psychophysics; 1996. p. 63–8.
Grondin S. Unequal Weber fraction for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72:1422–30.
Bizo LA, Chu JYM, Sanabria F, Killeen PR. The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and production. Behav Processes. 2006;71:201–10.
Münsterberg H. Beiträge zur experimentellen Psychologie: Heft 2. Freiburg: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung von J. C. B. Mohr; 1889.
Michon JA. The complete time experiencer. In: Michon JA, Jackson JL, editors. Time, mind, and behavior. Berlin: Springer; 1985. p. 21–54.
Buonomano DV, Bramen J, Khodadadifar M. Influence of the interstimulus interval on temporal processing and learning: testing the state-dependent network model. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1865–73.
Spencer RMC, Karmarkar U, Ivry RB. Evaluating dedicated and intrinsic models of temporal encoding by varying context. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1853–63.
Rammsayer TH, Lima SD. Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors. Percept Psychophys. 1991;50:565–74.
Lewis PA, Miall RC. Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:1–6.
Lewis PA, Miall RC. Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra- second intervals. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1583–92.
Lewis PA, Miall RC. Remembering in time: a continuous clock. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:401–6.
Rammsayer T. Sensory and cognitive mechanisms in temporal processing elucidated by a model systems approach. In: Helfrich H, editor. Time and mind II: information processing perspectives. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber; 2003. p. 97–113.
Rammsayer T. Neuropharmacological approaches to human timing. In: Grondin S, editor. Psychology of time. Bingley: Emerald; 2008. p. 295–320.
Rammsayer T. Effects of pharmacologically induced dopamine-receptor stimulation on human temporal information processing. Neuroquantology. 2009;7:103–13.
Getty DJ. Discrimination of short temporal intervals: a comparison of two models. Percept Psychophys. 1975;18:1–8.
Merchant H, Harrington DL, Meck WH. Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013;36:313–36.
Keele S, Nicoletti R, Ivry R, Pokorny R. Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms? A correlational analysis. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1985;60:173–91.
Rammsayer TH, Brandler S. Aspects of temporal information processing: a dimensional analysis. Psychol Res. 2004;69:115–23.
Merchant H, Zarco W, Prado L. Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99:939–49.
Penney TB, Tourret S. Les effets de la modalité sensorielle sur la perception du temps. Psychol Fr. 2005;50:131–43.
van Wassenhove V. Minding time in an amodal representational space. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1815–30.
Rammsayer TH. Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72:1591–600.
Kaernbach C. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept Psychophys. 1991;49:227–9.
Rammsayer T. Developing a psychophysical measure to assess duration discrimination in the range of milliseconds: methodological and psychometric issues. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:172–80.
Luce RD, Galanter E. Discrimination. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E, editors. Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley; 1963. p. 191–243.
Church RM, Gibbon J. Temporal generalization. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982;8:165–86.
McCormack T, Brown GDA, Maylor EA, Richardson LBN, Darby RJ. Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration. Psychol Aging. 2002;17:363–78.
Wearden JH, Wearden AJ, Rabbitt PMA. Age and IQ effects on stimulus and response timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997;23:962–79.
Abel SM. Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972;51:1219–23.
Buonomano DV, Karmarkar UR. How do we tell time? Neuroscientist. 2002;8:42–51.
Grondin S, Meilleur-Wells G, Lachance R. When to start explicit counting in time-intervals discrimination task: a critical point in the timing process of humans. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25:993–1004.
Grondin S, Ouellet B, Roussel M-E. Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Can J Exp Psychol. 2004;58:1–12.
Loehlin JC. Latent variable models – an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. 3rd ed. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1998.
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Meth Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 1998.
Hellström Å, Rammsayer T. Mechanisms behind discrimination of short and long auditory durations. In: da Silva JA, Matsushima EH, Ribeiro-Filho NP, editors. Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Rio de Janeiro: The International Society for Psychophysics; 2002. p. 110–5.
Rammsayer T. Effects of pharmacologically induced changes in NMDA receptor activity on human timing and sensorimotor performance. Brain Res. 2006;1073–1074:407–16.
Rammsayer T, Ulrich R. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005;120:141–71.
Gooch CM, Wiener M, Hamilton AC, Coslett HB. Temporal discrimination of sub- and suprasecond time intervals: a voxel-based lesion mapping analysis. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3190120/.
Lewis PA, Miall RC. A right hemispheric prefrontal system for cognitive time measurement. Behav Processes. 2006;71:226–34.
Wiener M, Turkeltaub P, Coslett HB. The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2010;49:1728–40.
Mangels JA, Ivry RB, Shimizu N. Dissociable contributions of the prefrontal and neocerebellar cortex to time perception. Cogn Brain Res. 1998;7:15–39.
Nichelli P, Clark K, Hollnagel C, Grafman J. Duration processing after frontal lobe lesions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;769:183–90.
Wiener M, Matell MS, Coslett HB. Multiple mechanisms for temporal processing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136737/.
Bangert AS, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Seidler RD. Mechanisms of timing across tasks and intervals. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011;136:20–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rammsayer, T.H., Troche, S.J. (2014). Elucidating the Internal Structure of Psychophysical Timing Performance in the Sub-second and Second Range by Utilizing Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In: Merchant, H., de Lafuente, V. (eds) Neurobiology of Interval Timing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 829. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1781-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1782-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)