Skip to main content

Reoperative Antireflux Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Antireflux Surgery
  • 1501 Accesses

Abstract

Despite documented success of antireflux surgery in controlling GERD in select patients, there remains a persistent incidence of failure requiring reoperation. Broadly speaking, the need for reoperation can be broken into three general categories, errors in diagnosis or patient selection, intraoperative errors, or the natural history of the antireflux operation itself or the condition being treated. When evaluating a patient for possible reoperative antireflux surgery, there are a variety of ways to approach the management, both determining whether to undertake a redo, and what operation to perform. These decisions depend on the timing of the development of recurrent symptoms or problems and the pattern of failure. Patterns of failure include, fundoplication disruption, recurrent or development of new hiatal hernia, tight fundoplication or crural stenosis, slipped fundoplication, and a fundoplication that is either too loose or misplaced at the time of initial surgery. Failure of antireflux surgery and the pattern of failure can usually be suspected based on presenting symptoms, either recurrent or new. A directed work-up including anatomic and functional studies should identify the failure pattern and guide decision-making about reoperation. Careful technique at the time of reoperation can result in a high rate of success of both resolving presenting symptoms and providing durable control of GERD. Understanding the patterns of failure can help guide improvements in technique to minimize future failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Broeders JA, Roks DJ, Ahmed Ali U, et al. Laparoscopic anterior 180-degree versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):850–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Voelker R. Proton pump inhibitors linked to fracture risk. JAMA. 2010;304(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuehn BM. Reflux drugs linked to C. difficile-related diarrhea. JAMA. 2012;307(10):1014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cayla G, Hulot JS, O'Connor SA, et al. Clinical, angiographic, and genetic factors associated with early coronary stent thrombosis. JAMA. 2011;306(16):1765–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giuliano C, Wilhelm SM, Kale-Pradhan PB. Are proton pump inhibitors associated with the development of community-acquired pneumonia? A meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 5(3):337–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teixeira JP, Moreira LM, Flores A, Ribeiro C. Durability of long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen – comparison of the results at 5 and 10 years after surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59(120):2428–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosemurgy A, Paul H, Madison L, et al. A single institution's experience and journey with over 1000 laparoscopic fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am Surg. 2012;78(9):917–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oelschlager BK, Ma KC, Soares RV, Montenovo MI, Munoz Oca JE, Pellegrini CA. A broad assessment of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Engstrom C, Cai W, Irvine T, et al. Twenty years of experience with laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1415–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Broeders JA, Roks DJ, Draaisma WA, et al. Predictors of objectively identified recurrent reflux after primary Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):673–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watson DI, Devitt PG, Smith L, Jamieson GG. Anterior 90 partial vs Nissen fundoplication–5 year follow-up of a single-centre randomised trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(9):1653–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salminen P, Hurme S, Ovaska J. Fifteen-year outcome of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(1):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA, Asche KU, Granderath FA, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: objective and subjective results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):413–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khatri K, Sajid MS, Brodrick R, Baig MK, Sayegh M, Singh KK. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with or without short gastric vessel division: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):970–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao Z, Cai W, Qin M, Zhao H, Yue P, Li Y. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic anterior 180 partial versus 360 Nissen fundoplication: 5-year results. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(2):114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Broeders JA, Roks DJ, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG, Baigrie RJ, Watson DI. Five-year outcome after laparoscopic anterior partial versus Nissen fundoplication: four randomized trials. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):637–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aye RW, Swanstrom LL, Kapur S, et al. A randomized multiinstitution comparison of the laparoscopic Nissen and Hill repairs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(3):951–7. discussion 7–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallemagne B, Perretta S. Twenty years of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD. World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1428–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wileman SM, McCann S, Grant AM, Krukowski ZH, Bruce J. Medical versus surgical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3, CD003243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith CD. Surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications, evaluation, and procedures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;19(1):35–48, v–vi.

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ. A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):706–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG. When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg. 2005;241(6):861–9. discussion 9–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, et al. Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3095–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin E, Swafford V, Chadalavada R, Ramshaw BJ, Smith CD. Disparity between symptomatic and physiologic outcomes following esophageal lengthening procedures for antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(1):31–9. discussion 8–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, Hunter JG, Smith CD. Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):1978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vignal JC, Luc G, Wagner T, Cunha AS, Collet D. Re-operation for failed gastro-esophageal fundoplication. What results to expect? J Visc Surg. 2012;149(1):e61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Musunuru S, Gould JC. Perioperative outcomes of surgical procedures for symptomatic fundoplication failure: a retrospective case–control study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):838–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, et al. Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(2):135–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khajanchee YS, O’Rourke R, Cassera MA, Gatta P, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL. Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery: subjective and objective outcomes in 176 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2007;142(8):785–901. discussion 791–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Byrne JP, Smithers BM, Nathanson LK, Martin I, Ong HS, Gotley DC. Symptomatic and functional outcome after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92(8):996–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Legner A, Tsuboi K, Bathla L, Lee T, Morrow LE, Mittal SK. Reoperative antireflux surgery for dysphagia. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dallemagne B, Arenas Sanchez M, Francart D, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. Br J Surg. 2011;98(11):1581–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Daniel Smith MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, C.D. (2015). Reoperative Antireflux Surgery. In: Swanstrom, L., Dunst, C. (eds) Antireflux Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1749-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1749-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1748-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1749-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics