Skip to main content

22 Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Management of Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery
  • 1615 Accesses

Abstract

Early adverse events occur after LAGB as may occur after any major abdominal procedure, but these have been surprisingly uncommon and are manageable. Access port site infection is preventable. Trauma to the stomach or other regional structures can be avoided by detailed knowledge of the anatomy and gentle technique. Perioperative mortality should approach zero.

Symmetrical enlargements and other forms of proximal gastric enlargements such as slips remain the major late adverse event. They can be markedly reduced by band selection and by proper patient education regarding eating small amounts of good food slowly. Understanding the physiology of the band, particularly the mechanisms for induction of satiety and satiation, is essential for optimal patient education. Erosions remain an uncommon issue. All late adverse events are manageable and, with correction, the patient’s weight loss pattern can be predicted to follow the weight loss of the overall group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, Barakat HA, deRamon RA, Israel G, Dolezal JM, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:543–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman A, Kiroff G, Game P, Foster B, O’Brien P, Ham J, Maddern G. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic review. Surgery. 2004;135: 326–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, Maglione M, Sugerman HJ, Livingston EH, Nguyen NT, Li Z, Mojica WA, Hilton L, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:547–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, Pories W, Courcoulas A, McCloskey C, Mitchell J, Patterson E, Pomp A, Staten MA, Yanovski SZ, Thirlby R, Wolfe B. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:445–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien P, McDonald L, Anderson M, Brennan L, Brown WA. Long term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen year follow up after gastric banding and a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M. A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg. 2005;15:820–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon AF, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding induces prolonged satiety: a randomized blind crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:813–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE. Mechanisms of bolus clearance in patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Richards M, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE. Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1508–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton PR, Yap K, Brown WA, Laurie C, O’Donnell M, Hebbard G, Kalff V, O’Brien PE. Changes in satiety, supra- and infraband transit, and gastric emptying following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective follow-up study. Obes Surg. 2011;21:217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pournaras DJ, Le Roux CW. The effect of bariatric surgery on gut hormones that alter appetite. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35:508–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berthoud HR. Vagal and hormonal gut-brain communication: from satiation to satisfaction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20 Suppl 1:64–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zagorodnyuk VP, Chen BN, Brookes SJ. Intraganglionic laminar endings are mechano-transduction sites of vagal tension receptors in the guinea-pig stomach. J Physiol. 2001;534:255–68.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien PE, McMurrick P. Posterior gastric wall prolapse after lap-band placement. Obes Surg. 1995;5:247 [Abstract].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Korin A, Yap K, Richards M, Owens J, Crosthwaite G, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE. Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol. Obes Surg. 2010;20:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manganiello M, Sarker S, Tempel M, Shayani V. Management of slipped adjustable gastric bands. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:534–8; discussion 538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien P. The lap-band solution: a partnership for weight loss. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weiner R, Emmerlich V, Wagner D, Bockhorn H. Management and therapy of postoperative complications after “gastric banding” for morbid obesity. Chirurg. 1998;69:1082–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Egberts K, Brown WA, O’Brien PE. Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ren CWM. Favorable early results of gastric banding for morbid obesity: the American experience. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:543–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Westling A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M, Gustavsson S. Silicone-adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg. 1998;8:467–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown W, Egberts KJ, Franke-Richard D, Thodiyil P, Anderson MA, O’Brien PE. Erosions following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: diagnosis and management. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):1047–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Neto M, Ramos AC, Campos JM, Murakami AH, Falcao M, Moura EH, Evangelista LF, Escalona A, Zundel N. Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:423–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Brien P. Comment on: Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:427–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul O’Brien M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Questions and Answers

Review Questions and Answers

  1. 1.

    An optimal tightness of the adjustable band occurs when:

    1. (a)

      Solid food sits above the band to give a sense of fullness

    2. (b)

      Liquids can pass with some resistance across the band

    3. (c)

      There is little appetite for food throughout the day

    4. (d)

      Barium imaging shows slow transit

    5. (e)

      A small amount of food satisfies any hunger

      (c) and (e) are correct

  2. 2.

    The following are true regarding proximal gastric enlargements above the band:

    1. (a)

      All enlargements are associated with slippage of the stomach from below

    2. (b)

      Anterior prolapse can develop into an acute surgical emergency

    3. (c)

      Posterior prolapse is largely prevented by use of the pars flaccida pathway

    4. (d)

      Symmetrical enlargement of the stomach can be distinguished from a symmetrical enlargement of the esophagus by barium swallow

    5. e.

      Most symmetrical enlargements will resolve by removing fluid from the band

      (b), (c) and (e) are correct

  3. 3.

    Erosion of the gastric band into the lumen of the stomach:

    1. (a)

      Is likely to occur in about 1 % of patients

    2. (b)

      Is due to adjusting the band too tightly

    3. (c)

      Is the commonest cause of an acute abdomen in someone with a gastric band

    4. (d)

      Can be effectively treated by removal of the band and later replacement

    5. (e)

      Removal of the band by endoscopic technique is simpler and safer than laparoscopic approach

      (a) and (d) are correct

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Brien, P. (2015). 22 Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Management of Complications. In: Brethauer, S., Schauer, P., Schirmer, B. (eds) Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1637-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1637-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1636-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1637-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics