Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in Nonsurgical Sampling Techniques for the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Diagnosing Non-small Cell Carcinoma in Small Biopsy and Cytology

  • 1159 Accesses

Abstract

A clinician has multiple options when a decision has been made to sample a lesion in the chest for the purposes of diagnosing or staging an intrathoracic malignancy. Suspected primary or metastatic parenchymal lesions may be amenable to percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsy, various bronchoscopic approaches, or surgical sampling. When selecting from among these options, the overriding goal should be to obtain all of the information needed for diagnosis and staging with the least risk to the patient. This chapter will address some of the more commonly used nonsurgical techniques employed for sampling known or suspected intrathoracic malignancies, with emphasis on recently developed techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endobronchial ultrasound-guided sampling of peripheral nodules using radial probe technology (RP-EBUS), and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB), as well as established modalities such as CT-guided needle aspiration (CTNA) and CT-guided needle biopsy (CTNB). The optimal paradigm for care of the patient with lung cancer involves communication and coordination between the cytopathologist and the clinician who is choosing a sampling modality. It is therefore critical that the cytopathologist understand the rationale for and the limitations of each of these techniques in order to fully participate in this care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute, SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Lung and Bronchus Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Radiology: Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System. Available from: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS

  3. Patricia Rivera M, Wahidi MM. Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest Physicians Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl): e142S–e165S. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2353

  4. Wang KP, Brower R, Haponik EF, Siegelman S. Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1983;84:571–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang KP, Terry PB. Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127(3):344–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holty J, Kuschner W, Gould M. Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2005;60(11):949–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Feller-Kopman D, Yung RC-W, Burroughs F, Li QK. Cytology of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol. 2009;117:482–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanna WC, Yasufuku K. Bronchoscopic staging of lung cancer. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2013;7(2):111–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herth F, Becker HD, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial. Chest. 2004;125(1):322–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheski FD, Mathur PN. Endobronchial ultrasound. Chest. 2008;133(1):264–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2012;142(2):385–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Herth FJ, Krasnik M, Kahn N, et al. Combined endoscopic-endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes through a single bronchoscope in 150 patients with suspected lung cancer. Chest. 2010;138(4):790–4. doi:10.1378/chest.09-2149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saji J, Kurimoto N, Morita K, Nakamura M, Inoue T, Nakamura H, Miyazawa T. Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. J Bronchol Intervent Pulmonol. 2011;18:239–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarmus LB, Akulian J, Lechtzin N, Yasin F, Kamdar B, Ernst A, Ost DE, Ray C, Greenhill SR, Jimenez CA, Filner J, Feller-Kopman D. American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation (AQuIRE) Participants. Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation Registry. Chest. 2013;143(4):1036–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herth FJ, Ernst A, Eberhardt R, Vilmann P, Dienemann H, Krasnik M. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes in the radiologically normal mediastinum. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(5):910–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yarmus LB, Akulian JA, Gilbert C, Mathai SC, Sathiyamoorthy S, Sahetya S, Harris K, Gillespie C, Haas A, Feller-Kopman D, Sterman D, Lee HJ. Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10(2):121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, Feller-Kopman D, Eapen GA, Kovitz KL, Herth FJ, Simoff M, AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Chest. 2011;140(6):1557–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eapen GA, Shah AM, Lei X, Jimenez CA, Morice RC, Yarmus L, Filner J, Ray C, Michaud G, Greenhill SR, Sarkiss M, Casal R, Rice D, Ost DE. American College of Chest Physicians complications, consequences, and practice patterns of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE registry. Quality Improvement Registry, Education. Chest. 2013;143(4):1044–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams K, Shah PL, Edmonds L, Lim E. Test performance of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2009;64(9):757–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu P, Zhao YZ, Jiang LY. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45: 1389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasufuku K, Pierre A, Darling G, de Perrot M, Waddell T, Johnston M, da Cunha SG, Geddie W, Boerner S, Le LW, Keshavjee S. A prospective controlled trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with mediastinoscopy for mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Detterbeck FC, Jantz MA, Wallace M, Vansteenkiste J, Silvestri GA. Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:202S–220S.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harewood GC, Pascual J, Raimondo M, Woodward T, Johnson M, McComb B, Odell J, Jamil LH, Gill KR, Wallace MB. Economic analysis of combined endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2010;67:366–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim K, Rice TW, Murthy SC, DeCamp MM, Pierce CD, Karchmer DP, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Combined bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy, and thoracotomy for lung cancer: Who benefits? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:850–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang KP, Mehta AC, Francis Turner Jr J. Flexible bronchoscopy. New York: Wiley; 2012. p. 35.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Eckardt SM, Kaul P. A40. Case reports in pleural disease. 2010: A1472. 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2010.181.1_MeetingAbstracts.A1472

  27. Smith JP, Selej M, Carlos WG, Diab K. D102. Case reports: interventional pulmonary and lung transplantation, 2013: A5812. 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2013.187.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5812

  28. Parker KL, Bizekis CS, Zervos MD. Severe mediastinal infection with abscess formation after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1271–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang CT, Chen CY, Ho CC, Yu CJ. A rare constellation of empyema, lung abscess, and mediastinal abscess as a complication of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:264–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Navani N, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration prevents mediastinoscopies in the diagnosis of isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(3):255–260. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0393OC

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aguilar-Lopez CA, Weir I, Winter S. D102. Case reports: interventional pulmonary and lung transplantation, 2013: A5809. 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2013.187.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5809

  32. Asano F, Aoe M, Ohsaki Y, Okada Y, Sasada S, Sato S, Suzuki E, Semba H, Fukuoka K, Fujino S, Ohmori K. Complications associated with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a nationwide survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy. Resp Res. 2013;14(50):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Erik Folch MD, Adnan Majid MD. FCCP point: are >50 supervised procedures required to develop competency in performing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging? Yes. Chest. 2013;143(4):888–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee HS, Lee GK, Lee HS, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: how many aspirations per target lymph node station? Chest. 2008;134(2):368–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Diacon AH, Schuurmans MM, Theron J, et al. Transbronchial needle aspirates: how many passes per target site? Eur Respir J. 2007;29(1):112–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Alsharif M, Andrade RS, Groth SS, Stelow EB, Pambuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration: the University of Minnesota experience, with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficulties. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Micames CG, McCrory DC, Pavey DA, Jowell PS, Gress FG. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2007;131:539–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang R, Mietchen C, Krüger M, Wiegmann B, Golpon H, Dettmer S, Haverich A, Zardo P. Endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus transcervical mediastinoscopy in nodal staging of non small cell lung cancer: a prospective comparison study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 7:51.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vincent BD, El-Bayoumi E, Hoffman B, Doelken P, DeRosimo J, Reed C, Silvestri GA. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lymph node aspiration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bulman W, Saqi A, Powell CA. Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(6): 606–611.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shrager JB. Mediastinoscopy: still the gold standard. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):S2084–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cardillo G. The risk of malignancy is related to patient age, size of the nodule, smoking history, evidence of adenopathy, increasing nodule size on serial studies, and irregular lesion borders. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(5):1607–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ost DE, Gould MK. Decision making in patients with pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(4):363–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rolston KV, Rodriguez S, Dholakia N, Whimbey E, Raad I. Pulmonary infections mimicking cancer: a retrospective, three-year review. Support Care Cancer. 1997;5(2):90–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:395–409

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mullan CP, Kelly BE, Ellis PK, Hughes S, Anderson N, McCluggage WG. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration of lung nodules: effect on outcome of using coaxial technique and Immediate cytological evaluation. Ulster Med J. 2004;73(1):32–6.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gelbman BD, Cham MD, Kim W, Libby DM, Smith JP, Port JL, Altorki NK, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Radiographic and clinical characterization of false negative results from CT-guided needle biopsies of lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(5):815–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tuna T, Ozkaya S, Dirican A, Findik S, Gatici A, Erkan L. Diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration and biopsy in patients with pulmonary disease. OncoTargets Therapy. 2013;6:1553–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology. 1996;198(3):715–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Richardson CM, Pointon KS, Manhire AR, Macfarlane JT. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(897):731–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, Shibamoto K, Inoue D, Matsui Y, Kanazawa S. Incidence of and risk factors for pneumothorax and chest tube placement after ct fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of the procedures conducted over a 9-year period. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:809–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(3):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lorenz J, Blum M. Complications of percutaneous chest biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006;23(2):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Inring RB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rosp J. 2011;37(4):902–10.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schwarz Y, Mehta AC, Ernst A, Herth F, Engel A, Besser D, Becker HD. Electromagnetic navigation during flexible bronchoscopy. Respiration. 2003;70(5):516–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schwarz Y, Greif J, Becker HD, Ernst A, Mehta A. Real-time electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy to peripheral lung lesions using overlaid CT images: the first human study. Chest. 2006;129(4):988–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Leong S, Ju H, Marshall H, Bowman R, Yang I, Ree AM, Saxon C, Fong KM. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy: A descriptive analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2012;4(2):173–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Herth F, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy in peripheral lung lesions. Chest. 2007;131(6):1800–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gildea TR, Mazzone PJ, Karnak D, Meziane M, Mehta AC. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy. A prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:982–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Lamprecht B, Porsch P, Wegleitner B, Strasser G, Kaiser B, Studnicka M. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB): increasing diagnostic yield. Respir Med. 2012;106(5): 710–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Seijo LM, de Torres JP, Lozano MD, Bastarrika G, Alcaide AB, Lacunza MM, Zulueta JJ. Diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is highly dependent on the presence of a Bronchus sign on CT imaging: results from a prospective study. Chest. 2010;138(6):1316–21. doi:10.1378/chest.09-2708. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dale CR, Madtes DK, Fan VS, Gorden JA, Veenstra DL. Navigational bronchoscopy with biopsy versus ct-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of a solitary pulmonary nodule: a cost-consequences. Anal J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2012;19(4):294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    David F. Yankelevitz M.D.

  2. Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY, 10032, USA

    William Bulman M.D.

Authors
  1. David F. Yankelevitz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Bulman M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Bulman M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

    Andre Luis Moreira

  2. Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA

    Anjali Saqi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yankelevitz, D.F., Bulman, W. (2015). Advances in Nonsurgical Sampling Techniques for the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer. In: Moreira, A., Saqi, A. (eds) Diagnosing Non-small Cell Carcinoma in Small Biopsy and Cytology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1607-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1607-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1606-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1607-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation