Advertisement

On symmetric SL-invariant polynomials in four qubits

  • Gilad GourEmail author
  • Nolan R. Wallach
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 257)

Abstract

We find the generating set of \(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}\nolimits\)-invariant polynomials in four qubits that are also invariant under permutations of the qubits. The set consists of four polynomials of degrees 2, 6, 8, and 12, for which we find an elegant expression in the space of critical states. These invariants are the degrees if the basic invariants of the invariants for F 4, and in fact, the group plays an important role in this note. In addition, we show that the hyperdeterminant in four qubits is the only \(\mathop{\mathrm{SL}}\nolimits\)-invariant polynomial (up to powers of itself) that is non-vanishing precisely on the set of generic states.

Keywords

Quantum entanglement SL-invariant polynomials Four qubits Permutation invariant 

Mathematics Subject Classification

22 81 

Notes

Acknowledgements:

GG research is supported by NSERC, NW was partially supported by an NSF Summer Grant

References

  1. 1.
    N. Bourbaki, Éléments de mathématique. Fasc. XXXIV. Groupes et algèbres de Lie. Chapitre IV: Groupes de Coxeter et systèmes de Tits. Chapitre V: Groupes engendrés par des réflexions. Chapitre VI: systèmes de racines (French) Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, No. 1337, Hermann, Paris, 1968, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. S. Bullock and G. K. Brennen, Canonical decompositions of n-qubit quantum computations and concurrence, J. Math. Phys. 45 (2004), 2447–2467.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000), 052306, 5 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Ž. Doković and A. Osterloh, On polynomial invariants of several qubits, J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009), 033509, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A (3) 62 (2000), 062314, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Gour and N. R. Wallach, All maximally entangled four-qubit states, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010), 112201, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Modern Phys. 81 (2009), 865–942.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. E. Humphreys, Reflection groups and Coxeter groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. xii+204 pp.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Kostant, Lie group representations on polynomial rings, Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963) 327–404.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-G. Luque and J.-Y. Thibon, Polynomial invariants of four qubits, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003), 042303, 5 pp.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. L. Mehta, Basic sets of invariant polynomials for finite reflection groups, Comm. Algebra 16 (1988), 1083–1098.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Miyake, Classification of multipartite entangled states by multidimensional determinants, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003), 012108, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Miyake and M. Wadati, Multipartite entanglement and hyperdeterminants, ERATO Workshop on Quantum Information Science (Tokyo, 2002), Quantum Inf. Comput. 2 (2002), suppl., 540–555.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Osterloh and J. Siewert, Constructing N-qubit entanglement monotones from antilinear operators, Phys. Rev. A. 72 (2005), 012337, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to entanglement measures, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 (2007), 1–51.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Uhlmann, Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states, Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000), 032307, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    È. B. Vinberg, The Weyl group of a graded Lie algebra, (Russian) Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 40 (1976), 488–526, 709.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. De Moor, Normal forms and entanglement measures for multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003), 012103, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. R. Wallach, Quantum computing and entanglement for mathematicians, Notes from Venice C.I.M.E. June 2004, http://www.math.ucsd.edu/~nwallach/venice.pdf, 29 pp.
  20. 20.
    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), 2245–2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of California at San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations