Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affects a significant proportion of men and its prevalence increases with age. Moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by BPH will occur in approximately one quarter of men in their 50s and in approximately half of all men 80 years or older. When medical control of symptoms fails, and/or complications occur, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is attempted. Novel minimally invasive techniques (MIT) have been introduced in recent years with the aim of reducing complications, costs, and length of stay, while equaling or bettering the functional outcomes of conventional TURP. Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) technique has emerged as an interesting approach in the quest for a nonsurgical alternative to standard BPH treatment for patients that do not respond to medical treatment. Although comparative studies are lacking, preliminary results suggest short-term outcomes better than medical therapy but likely inferior to minimally invasive therapy. Long-term outcomes remain unknown and are surely necessary to establish PAE as a standard of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson KE, et al. Tadalafil for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: pathophysiology and mechanism(s) of action. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(3):292–301.
McVary KT. BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(5 Suppl):S122–8.
Madersbacher S, et al. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004;46(5):547–54.
McVary KT, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1793–803.
Oelke M, et al. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):917–25.
Burnett AL, Wein AJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care: what you need to know. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 2):S19–24.
Baazeem A, Elhilali MM. Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: current evidence. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(10):540–9.
Varkarakis J, Bartsch G, Horninger W. Long-term morbidity and mortality of transurethral prostatectomy: a 10-year follow-up. Prostate. 2004;58(3):248–51.
Mitchell ME, et al. Control of massive prostatic bleeding with angiographic techniques. J Urol. 1976;115(6):692–5.
Bischoff W, Goerttler U. Successful intra-arterial embolization of bleeding carcinoma of the prostate (author’s transl). Urologe A. 1977;16(2):99–102.
DeMeritt JS, et al. Relief of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related bladder outlet obstruction after transarterial polyvinyl alcohol prostate embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(6):767–70.
Barbieri A, et al. Massive hematuria after transurethral resection of the prostate: management by intra-arterial embolization. Urol Int. 2002;69(4):318–20.
Jeon GS, et al. The effect of transarterial prostate embolization in hormone-induced benign prostatic hyperplasia in dogs: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(3):384–90.
Sun F, et al. Transarterial prostatic embolization: initial experience in a canine model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(2):495–501.
Sun F, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: transcatheter arterial embolization as potential treatment–preliminary study in pigs. Radiology. 2008;246(3):783–9.
Bilhim T, et al. Prostatic arterial supply: anatomic and imaging findings relevant for selective arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(11):1403–15.
Bilhim T, et al. Does polyvinyl alcohol particle size change the outcome of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Results from a single-center randomized prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1595–602.
Pereira JA, et al. Radiologic anatomy of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction: a systematized approach. Acta Med Port. 2013;26(3):219–25.
Pisco JM, et al. Erratum to: Embolisation of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and mid-term follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(9):2573–4.
Pisco JM, et al. Embolisation of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and mid-term follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(9):2561–72.
Pais D, et al. Sciatic nerve high division: two different anatomical variants. Acta Med Port. 2013;26(3):208–11.
Bilhim T, et al. Middle rectal artery: myth or reality? Retrospective study with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(6):517–22.
Bilhim T, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral prostatic arterial embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate enlargement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(2):403–11.
Bilhim T, et al. Radiological anatomy of prostatic arteries. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):276–85.
Bouissou H, Talazac A. Arterial vascularization of the normal and the pathological prostate. Ann Anat Pathol (Paris). 1959;4(1):63–79.
Flocks RH. The arterial distribution within the prostate gland; its role in transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol. 1937;37:524–48.
Ambrosio JD, De Almeida JS, De Souza A. Origin of prostatic arteries in man. Rev Paul Med. 1980;96(3–4):52–5.
Bilhim T, et al. Prostatic arterial supply: demonstration by multirow detector angio CT and catheter angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(5):1119–26.
Pereira JA, et al. Patient selection and counseling before prostatic arterial embolization. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):270–5.
Carnevale FC, Antunes AA. Prostatic artery embolization for enlarged prostates due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. How i do it. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:1452–63.
Antunes AA, et al. Clinical, laboratorial, and urodynamic findings of prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. A prospective single-center pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(4):978–86.
Pisco J, et al. Prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: short- and intermediate-term results. Radiology. 2013;266(2):668–77.
Fernandes L, et al. Prostatic arterial embolization: post-procedural follow-up. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):294–9.
Bagla S, et al. Utility of cone-beam CT imaging in prostatic artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1603–7.
Moreira AM, et al. Transient Ischemic rectitis as a potential complication after prostatic artery embolization: case report and review of the literature. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(6):1690–4.
Rio Tinto H, et al. Prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: short and medium follow-up. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):290–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Donova, R.V., Hueber, PA., Bhojani, N., Trinh, QD., Zorn, K.C. (2015). Prostatic Artery Embolization. In: Chughtai, B., Te, A., Kaplan, S. (eds) Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Modern Alternative to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1587-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1587-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1586-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1587-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)