Skip to main content

Design and Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials for Raynaud’s Phenomenon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Raynaud’s Phenomenon

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials play a crucial role in the identification of safe, effective treatments provided that they are designed, conducted and reported with care. Additional considerations arise in trials of treatments for Raynaud’s phenomenon due to characteristics of the condition. In particular, strong placebo responses, heterogeneity in the patient population and the impact of seasonal effects on patient outcomes must be accounted for. I discuss the issues around the design, analysis and reporting of trials for Raynaud’s phenomenon using recent examples from the literature. The features of common trial designs are expounded and recommendations for best practice are presented. The appropriate use of pilot studies as preparatory exercises is discussed, and the role of systematic reviews in the investigation of treatments for Raynaud’s phenomenon is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrick AL, van den Hoogen F, Gabrielli A, Tamimi N, Reid C, O’Connell D, Vasquez-Abad M, Denton CP. Modified-release sildenafil reduces Raynaud’s phenomenon attack frequency in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):775–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matucci-Cerinic M, Denton CP, Furst DE, Mayes MD, Hsu VM, Carpentier P, Wigley FM, Black CM, Fessler BJ, Merkel PA, Pope JE, Sweiss NJ, Doyle MK, Hellmich B, Medsger Jr TA, Morganti A, Kramer F, Korn JH, Seibold JR. Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):32–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shenoy PD, Kumar S, Jha LK, Choudhary SK, Singh U, Misra R, Agarwal V. Efficacy of tadalafil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon resistant to vasodilator therapy: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial. Rheumatology. 2010;49(12):2420–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caglayan E, Axmann S, Hellmich M, Moinzadeh P, Rosenkranz S. Vardenafil for the treatment of Raynaud phenomenon: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):1182–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altman D. Comparability of randomised groups. Statistician. 1985;34(1):125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dziadzio M, Denton CP, Smith ROY, Howell K, Blann A, Bowers E, Black CM. Losartan therapy for Raynaud’s phenomenon and scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(12):2646–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading. Trials. 2011;12(1):264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. European Medicines Agency. International Conference on Harmonisation Topic E10: Choice of control group in clinical trials 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Senn S. Cross-over trials in clinical research. Statistics in practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Fries R, Shariat K, von Wilmowsky H, Böhm M. Sildenafil in the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon resistant to vasodilatory therapy. Circulation. 2005;112:2980–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haahr MT, Hróbjartsson A. Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors. Clin Trials. 2006;3(4):360–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bredie SJH, Jong MC. No significant effect of ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761 in the treatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon: a randomized controlled Trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2012;59(2005):215–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murray AK, Moore TL, King TA, Herrick AL. Abnormal microvascular response is localized to the digits in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(6):1952–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maricq HR, Weinrich MC, Valter I, Palesch YY, Maricq JG. Digital vascular responses to cooling in subjects with cold sensitivity, primary Raynaud’s phenomenon, or scleroderma spectrum disorders. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(12):2068–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Senn S. Are placebo run ins justified? BMJ. 1997;314:1191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee S, Walker JR, Jakul L, Sexton K. Does elimination of placebo responders in a placebo run-in increase the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials? A meta-analytic evaluation. Depress Anxiety. 2004; 19(1):10–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trivedi MH, Rush H. Does a placebo run-in or a placebo treatment cell affect the efficacy of antidepressant medications? Neuropsychopharmacology. 1994; 11(1):33–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wigley FM, Korn JH, Csuka ME, Medsger Jr TA, Rothfield NF, Ellman M, et al. Oral iloprost treatment in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(4):670–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chung L, Shapiro L, Fiorentino D, Baron M, Shanahan J, Sule S, et al. MQX-503, a novel formulation of nitroglycerin, improves the severity of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(3):870–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Black CM, Halkier-Sorensen L, Belch JJ, Ullman S, Madhok R, Smit AJ, et al. Oral iloprost in Raynaud’s phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a multicentre, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(9):952–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Raynaud’s Treatment Study Investigators. Comparison of sustained-release nifedipine and temperature biofeedback for treatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon. Results from a randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Stat Med. 1986;292:746–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Browner WS, Newman TB. Are all significant P values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research. JAMA. 1987;257(18):2459–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fava A, Wung PK, Wigley FM, Hummers LK, Daya NR, Ghazarian SR, Boin F. Efficacy of Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(6):925–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrick AL, Murray AK, Ruck, Juha Rouru A, Moore TL, Whiteside J, Hakulinen P, Wigley F, Snapir A. A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial of the alpha2C-adrenoceptor antagonist ORM-12741 for prevention of cold-induced vasospasm in patients with systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2014;53(5):948–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lane PW. Meta-analysis of incidence of rare events. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22(2):117–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ennis H, Anderson ME, Wilkinson J, Herrick AL. Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(1).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roustit M, Blaise S, Allanore Y, Carpentier PH, Caglayan E, Cracowski J-L. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for the treatment of secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(10):1696–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stewart M, Morling JR. Oral vasodilators for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7, CD006687.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Wilkinson M.Sc., B.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilkinson, J. (2015). Design and Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials for Raynaud’s Phenomenon. In: Wigley, F., Herrick, A., Flavahan, N. (eds) Raynaud’s Phenomenon. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1526-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1526-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1525-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1526-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics