Skip to main content

Central Venous Access for Rural Surgeons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Surgical Techniques for Rural Surgeons
  • 1265 Accesses

Abstract

Central venous access can be performed with the anatomic landmark technique or with ultrasound guidance. Complications of insertion of central venous catheters include pneumothorax, vascular injury, and nerve injury. Indwelling complications include infection and thrombosis. Real-time ultrasound guidance can reduce the risk of injuries from central venous access. The ideal location of the catheter tip is in the distal superior vena cava, near the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium. Catheters with tips that extend deep into the right atrium may cause cardiac arrhythmias and have increased thrombosis rate. Catheters with tips in the proximal superior vena cava and inlet vessels (brachiocephalic veins) and subclavian veins also have higher thrombosis rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dudrick SJ. History of vascular access. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:S47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonosite.com/ultrasound-evidence/iatrogenic-pneumothorax-central-line-safety.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(4):681–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Araujo C, Silva JP, Antunes P, Fernandes JM, Dias C, Pereira H, Dias T, Fougo JL. A comparative study between two central veins for the insertion of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):222–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spencer A, Brown EB. Central venous access in breast oncology patients. In: Kuerer HM, editor. Kuerer’s breast surgical oncology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. p. 745–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caers J, Fontaine C, Vinh-Hung V, De Mey J, Ponnet G, Oost C, Lamote J, De Greve J, Van Camp B, Lacor P, et al. Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous ports. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(5):325–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadman A, Lawrance JA, Fitzsimmons L, Spencer-Shaw A, Swindell R. To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(4):349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakazawa N. Challenges in the accurate identification of the ideal catheter tip location. JAVA. 2010;15(4):196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM, Jawad AF, Towbin RB. Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(3):359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dariushnia SR, Wallace MJ, Siddiqi NH, Towbin RB, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):976–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vesely TM. Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(5):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  • Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953;39(5):368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheter in cancer treatment. Surgery. 1982;92(4):706–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RB, Greaves M, Schmitt M. Left superior vena cava: revisited. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(4):284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal SK, Punnam SR, Verma G, Ruberg FL. Persistent left superior vena cava: a case report and review of literature. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povoski SP, Khabiri H. Persistent left superior vena cava: review of the literature, clinical implications, and relevance of alterations in thoracic central venous anatomy as pertaining to the general principles of central venous access device placement and venography in cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:173.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ervin B. Brown M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, E.B. (2015). Central Venous Access for Rural Surgeons. In: Halverson, A., Borgstrom, D. (eds) Advanced Surgical Techniques for Rural Surgeons. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1495-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1495-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1494-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1495-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics