Abstract
Diagnostic hysteroscopy should be a basic surgical office technique for all gynecologists. The ability to directly visualize the uterine cavity and identify significant pathology represents development of an accurate and timely intervention to diagnose and in many cases, treat endometrial pathology in the office setting. Hysteroscopy in the office surgery setting has many indications and few contraindications and requires a basic set of equipment. It has been shown to be well accepted by patients and is relatively pain free. Few complications are recognized with this basic office procedure and tips on how to avoid them as well as timely recognition of them is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4:255–8.
Nagele F, O’Connor H, Davies A, et al. 2500 outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:87–92.
Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skook L, et al. Dilation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1131–6.
Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder MS, et al. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113:3–13.
Bradley LD. Indications and contraindications for office hysteroscopy. Chapter 3. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2009.
Park AJ, Bohrer JC, Bradley LD, et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical intervention after uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:671.e1–6.
Bradley LD. Hysteroscopic sterilization, Chapter 8. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2009.
Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, et al. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:553–5.
Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, et al. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:954–6.
Love CD, Muir BB, Scrimgeour JB, et al. Investigation of endometrial abnormalities in asymptomatic women treated with tamoxifen and an evaluation of the role of endometrial screening. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2050–4.
Perez-Medina T, Salazar FJ, San-Frutos E, et al. Hysteroscopic dynamic assessment of endometrium in patients treated with long-term tamoxifen. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:349–54.
Mouritas MJ, Van der Zee AGJ, Willemse PHB, et al. Discrepancy between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy and histology of endometrium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:21–6.
Emery JD, Falcone T. Effects of drugs on the uterus, Chapter 8. In: Baggish MS, Valle RF, Guedj H, editors. Hysteroscopy: visual perspectives of uterine anatomy, physiology and pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Vuento MH, Pirhonen JP, Makinen JI, et al. Endometrial fluid accumulation in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:37–41.
Bradley LD, Widrich T. State-of-the-art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2:263–7.
El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:962–5.
Ngai WS, Chan YM, Liu KL, et al. Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2373–5.
DeIaco P, Marabini A, Stefannetti M, et al. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:71–5.
Bradner P, Neis KJ, Ehmer C. The etiology, frequency, and prevention of gas embolism during CO2 hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:421–8.
Brusco GF, Arena S, Angelini A. Use of carbon dioxide versus normal saline for diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:993–7.
Pellicano M, Guida M, Lavitola G, et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:418–21.
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. Munro MG, Storz K, Abbott JA, et al. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:137–48.
Valle RF. Office hysteroscopy. Chapter 17. In: Baggish MS, Valle RF, Guedj H, editors. Hysteroscopy: visual perspectives of uterine anatomy, physiology and pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, et al. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2004;31:641–54.
Sharma M, Taylor A, di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the ‘no-touch’ technique. BJOG. 2005;112:963–7.
Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, et al. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG. 2010;117:532–9.
Bettochhi S, Di Spiezio SA, Ceci O. Instrumentation in office hysteroscopy: rigid hysteroscopy. Chapter 1. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Inc.; 2009.
Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:517–20.
Agostini A, Bretelle F, Ronda I, et al. Risk of vasovagal syndrome during outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:245–7.
Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, et al. Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double blind study. BJOG. 1997;104:316–9.
Cicinelli E, Schonauer LM, Barba B, et al. Tolerability and cardiovascular complications of outpatient diagnostic minihysteroscopy compared with conventional hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:399–402.
Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, Ulzen K, et al. Complications for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:266–70.
Loffer FD. Complications of hysteroscopy—their cause, prevention, and correction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;3:11–26.
McClausland VM, Fields GA, McClausland AM, et al. Tubo-ovarian abscesses after operative hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:198–200.
Emery J, Falcone T. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery, Chapter 20. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc.; 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emery, J.D. (2015). Office Diagnostic Hysteroscopy. In: Emery, J., Paraiso, M. (eds) Office-Based Gynecologic Surgical Procedures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1414-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1414-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1413-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1414-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)