Skip to main content

Office Diagnostic Hysteroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Office-Based Gynecologic Surgical Procedures

Abstract

Diagnostic hysteroscopy should be a basic surgical office technique for all gynecologists. The ability to directly visualize the uterine cavity and identify significant pathology represents development of an accurate and timely intervention to diagnose and in many cases, treat endometrial pathology in the office setting. Hysteroscopy in the office surgery setting has many indications and few contraindications and requires a basic set of equipment. It has been shown to be well accepted by patients and is relatively pain free. Few complications are recognized with this basic office procedure and tips on how to avoid them as well as timely recognition of them is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4:255–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagele F, O’Connor H, Davies A, et al. 2500 outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skook L, et al. Dilation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1131–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder MS, et al. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley LD. Indications and contraindications for office hysteroscopy. Chapter 3. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park AJ, Bohrer JC, Bradley LD, et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical intervention after uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:671.e1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley LD. Hysteroscopic sterilization, Chapter 8. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, et al. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:553–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, et al. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:954–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Love CD, Muir BB, Scrimgeour JB, et al. Investigation of endometrial abnormalities in asymptomatic women treated with tamoxifen and an evaluation of the role of endometrial screening. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2050–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perez-Medina T, Salazar FJ, San-Frutos E, et al. Hysteroscopic dynamic assessment of endometrium in patients treated with long-term tamoxifen. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouritas MJ, Van der Zee AGJ, Willemse PHB, et al. Discrepancy between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy and histology of endometrium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emery JD, Falcone T. Effects of drugs on the uterus, Chapter 8. In: Baggish MS, Valle RF, Guedj H, editors. Hysteroscopy: visual perspectives of uterine anatomy, physiology and pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vuento MH, Pirhonen JP, Makinen JI, et al. Endometrial fluid accumulation in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley LD, Widrich T. State-of-the-art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2:263–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:962–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ngai WS, Chan YM, Liu KL, et al. Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2373–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DeIaco P, Marabini A, Stefannetti M, et al. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:71–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradner P, Neis KJ, Ehmer C. The etiology, frequency, and prevention of gas embolism during CO2 hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:421–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brusco GF, Arena S, Angelini A. Use of carbon dioxide versus normal saline for diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:993–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellicano M, Guida M, Lavitola G, et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:418–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. Munro MG, Storz K, Abbott JA, et al. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:137–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Valle RF. Office hysteroscopy. Chapter 17. In: Baggish MS, Valle RF, Guedj H, editors. Hysteroscopy: visual perspectives of uterine anatomy, physiology and pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, et al. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2004;31:641–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma M, Taylor A, di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the ‘no-touch’ technique. BJOG. 2005;112:963–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, et al. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG. 2010;117:532–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bettochhi S, Di Spiezio SA, Ceci O. Instrumentation in office hysteroscopy: rigid hysteroscopy. Chapter 1. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Inc.; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:517–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Agostini A, Bretelle F, Ronda I, et al. Risk of vasovagal syndrome during outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:245–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, et al. Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double blind study. BJOG. 1997;104:316–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cicinelli E, Schonauer LM, Barba B, et al. Tolerability and cardiovascular complications of outpatient diagnostic minihysteroscopy compared with conventional hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:399–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, Ulzen K, et al. Complications for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Loffer FD. Complications of hysteroscopy—their cause, prevention, and correction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;3:11–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McClausland VM, Fields GA, McClausland AM, et al. Tubo-ovarian abscesses after operative hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:198–200.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Emery J, Falcone T. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery, Chapter 20. In: Bradley LD, Falcone T, editors. Hysteroscopy: office evaluation and management of the uterine cavity. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc.; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan D. Emery M.D., F.A.C.O.G. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emery, J.D. (2015). Office Diagnostic Hysteroscopy. In: Emery, J., Paraiso, M. (eds) Office-Based Gynecologic Surgical Procedures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1414-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1414-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1413-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1414-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics