Skip to main content

Modeling of Signal Transduction by the Quorum-Sensing Pathway in the Vibrios

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Physical Basis of Bacterial Quorum Communication

Part of the book series: Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMEDICAL))

  • 1366 Accesses

Abstract

Several bacterial species have regulatory networks that enable global alterations in gene expression in response to changes in local cell density. This process, commonly referred to as quorum sensing, typically leads to the regulation of cooperative processes such as bioluminescence and biofilm formation. Here, we provide an overview of the quorum-sensing network in the marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi and focus on studies based on theoretical modeling approaches. These studies have led to testable predictions for experiments that can further elucidate roles of pathway elements such as small RNAs in shaping and fine-tuning the quorum-sensing response to changes in cell density. Furthermore, single-cell analysis has provided new insights into information processing by the quorum sensing pathway and opened up new avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:165–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng WL, Bassler BL (2009) Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu Rev Genet 43:197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Appleby JL, Parkinson JS, Bourret RB (1996) Signal transduction via the multi-step phosphorelay: not necessarily a road less traveled. Cell 86:845–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laub MT, Goulian M (2007) Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Annu Rev Genet 41:121–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henke JM, Bassler BL (2004) Three parallel quorum-sensing systems regulate gene expression in Vibrio harveyi. J Bacteriol 186:6902–6914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mok KC, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL (2003) Vibrio harveyi quorum sensing: a coincidence detector for two autoinducers controls gene expression. EMBO J 22:870–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2006) The Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing system uses shared regulatory components to discriminate between multiple autoinducers. Genes Dev 20:2754–2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tu KC, Bassler BL (2007) Multiple small RNAs act additively to integrate sensory information and control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Genes Dev 21:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bassler BL, Miller MB (2013) Quorum sensing. In: The prokaryotes. Springer, New York, pp 495–509

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banik SK, Fenley AT, Kulkarni RV (2009) A model for signal transduction during quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Phys Biol 6:046008–046008

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Long T, Tu KC, Wang Y, Mehta P, Ong NP, Bassler BL, Wingreen NS (2009) Quantifying the integration of quorum-sensing signals with single-cell resolution. PLoS Biol 7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fenley AT, Banik SK, Kulkarni RV (2011) Computational modeling of differences in the quorum sensing induced luminescence phenotypes of Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. J Theor Biol 274:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter GAM, Vasquez FG, Keener JP (2013) A mathematical model and quantitative comparison of the small RNA circuit in the Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing systems. Phys Biol 10(4):046007

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter GAM, Keener JP (2014) Mechanisms additive and redundant qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. J Theor Biol 340:38–49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenz DH, Mok KC, Lilley BN, Kulkarni RV, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL (2004) The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell 118:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levine E, Zhang Z, Kuhlman T, Hwa T (2007) Quantitative characteristics of gene regulation by small RNA. PLoS Biol 5:e229–e229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine E, Hwa T (2008) Small RNAs establish gene expression thresholds. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta P, Goyal S, Wingreen NS (2008) A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation. Mol Syst Biol 4:221–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitarai N, Andersson AM, Krishna S, Semsey S, Sneppen K (2007) Efficient degradation and expression prioritization with small RNAs. Phys Biol 4:164–171

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitarai N, Benjamin JA, Krishna S, Semsey S, Csiszovszki Z, Massé E, Sneppen K (2009) Dynamic features of gene expression control by small regulatory RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10655–10659

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chatterjee J, Miyamoto CM, Meighen EA (1996) Autoregulation of luxR: the Vibrio harveyi lux-operon activator functions as a repressor. Mol Microbiol 20:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teng SW, Schaffer JN, Tu KC, Mehta P, Lu W, Ong NP, Bassler BL, Wingreen NS (2011) Active regulation of receptor ratios controls integration of quorum-sensing signals in Vibrio harveyi. Mol Syst Biol 7:491–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta P, Goyal S, Long T, Bassler BL, Wingreen NS (2009) Information processing and signal integration in bacterial quorum sensing. Mol Syst Biol 5:325–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teng SW, Wang Y, Tu KC, Long T, Mehta P, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL, Ong NP (2010) Measurement of the copy number of the master quorum-sensing regulator of a bacterial cell. Biophys J 98:2024–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Svenningsen SL, Tu KC, Bassler BL (2009) Gene dosage compensation calibrates four regulatory RNAs to control Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing. EMBO J 28:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai L, Friedman N, Xie XS (2006) Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 440:358–362

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedman N, Cai L, Xie XS (2006) Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. Phys Rev Lett 97:168302–168302

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenfeld N, Young JW, Alon U, Swain PS, Elowitz MB (2005) Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 307:1962–1965

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenfeld N, Perkins TJ, Alon U, Elowitz MB, Swain PS (2006) A fluctuation method to quantify in vivo fluorescence data. Biophys J 91:759–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Timmen M, Bassler BL, Jung K (2006) Ai-1 influences the kinase activity but not the phosphatase activity of LuxN of Vibrio harveyi. J Biol Chem 281:24398–24404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anetzberger C, Reiger M, Fekete A, Schell U, Stambrau N, Plener L, Kopka J, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Hilbi H, Jung K (2012) Autoinducers act as biological timers in Vibrio harveyi. PLoS ONE 7:e48310

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tu KC, Long T, Svenningsen SL, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL (2010) Negative feedback loops involving small regulatory RNAs precisely control the Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing response. Mol Cell 37:567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rutherford ST, van Kessel JC, Shao Y, Bassler BL (2011) AphA and LuxR/HapR reciprocally control quorum sensing in Vibrios. Genes Dev 25(4):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Kessel JC, Rutherford ST, Shao Y, Utria AF, Bassler BL (2013) Individual and combined roles of the master regulators AphA and LuxR in control of the Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing regulon. J Bacteriol 195(3):436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AB is thankful to CSIR (09/015(0375)/2009-EMR-I) for research fellowship. SKB acknowledges support from Bose Institute through Institutional Programme VI—Development of Systems Biology. RVK would like to acknowledge funding support from the NSF through award PHY-0957430.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul V. Kulkarni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandyopadhyay, A., Fenley, A.T., Banik, S.K., Kulkarni, R.V. (2015). Modeling of Signal Transduction by the Quorum-Sensing Pathway in the Vibrios. In: Hagen, S. (eds) The Physical Basis of Bacterial Quorum Communication. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1402-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1402-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1401-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1402-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics