Skip to main content

Engineering Cell-to-Cell Communication to Explore Fundamental Questions in Ecology and Evolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Physical Basis of Bacterial Quorum Communication

Abstract

Synthetic biology has created countless examples of gene circuits that lead to novel behavior in cells [1]. While the technological applications of these circuits, in terms of their use in medicine [2], industry [3, 4], and to study systems biology [5] has been acknowledged, synthetic biology is increasingly used to explore questions in evolution and ecology [6]. Traditionally, evolutionary and ecological studies have taken two separate approaches to address scientific questions. One traditional approach uses mathematical modeling to capture the essential aspects of the dynamic or relationship under study. Research is performed in silico, allowing the researcher to explore multiple parameters in a well-defined system, as compared to studying the relationship in its natural setting. However, predictions generated by mathematical models are often not verified experimentally, leading to questions regarding their validity [6]. On the other hand, studying a single dynamic in a natural setting offers its own set of challenges. Here, the single dynamic of interest may be subject to multiple interacting factors, which may obscure its true contribution to the relationship under study [7]. Synthetic biology thus offers a well-rounded intermediate between these two approaches; modeling predictions are verified in living, experimental systems [6, 7]. This dual approach has allowed for the study of ecological and evolutionary dynamics that would be nearly impossible to study in the natural environment. Indeed, the number of studies that have utilized synthetic biology to study such relationships is growing quickly (e.g., [8–10]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khalil AS, Collins JJ (2010) Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 11:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber W, Fussenegger M (2012) Emerging biomedical applications of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 13:21–35

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith R (2011) Design principles and applications of engineered microbial consortia. Acta Hortic 905:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner K, You L, Arnold FH (2008) Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol 26:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riccione KA, Smith RP, Lee AJ, You L (2012) A synthetic biology approach to understanding cellular information processing. ACS Synth Biol 1:389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanouchi Y, Smith R, You L (2012) Engineering microbial systems to explore ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:791–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Payne S, Smith R, You L (2012) Quantitative analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of a synthetic predator-prey ecosystem. In: Weber W, Fussenegger M (eds) Synthetic gene networks. Humana Press, New York, pp 315–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gore J, Youk H, van Oudenaarden A (2009) Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature 459:253–256

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerr B, Neuhauser C, Bohannan BJM, Dean AM (2006) Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host-pathogen ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 442:75–78

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koschwanez J, Foster K, Murray A (2011) Sucrose utilization in budding yeast as a model for the origin of undifferentiated multicellularity. PLoS Biol 9:e1001122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunstan PK, Johnson CR (2005) Predicting global dynamics from local interactions: individual-based models predict complex features of marine epibenthic communities. Ecol Model 186:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:165–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. You L, Cox RS, Weiss R, Arnold FH (2004) Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing. Nature 428:868–871

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dwyer DJ, Kohanski MA, Hayete B, Collins JJ (2007) Gyrase inhibitors induce an oxidative damage cellular death pathway in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaefer AL, Hanzelka BL, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP (2000) Detection, purification, and structural elucidation of the acylhomoserine lactone inducer of Vibrio fischeri luminescence and other related molecules. In: Methods in enzymology. Academic, New York, pp 288–301

    Google Scholar 

  16. Balagadde FK, You L, Hansen CL, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2005) Long-term monitoring of bacteria undergoing programmed population control in a microchemostat. Science 309:137–140

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balagadde FK, Song H, Ozaki J, Collins CH, Barnet M, Arnold FH, Quake SR, You L (2008) A synthetic Escherichia coli predator–prey ecosystem. Mol Syst Biol 4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murray J (2002) Mathematical biology, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Song H, Payne S, Gray M, You L (2009) Spatiotemporal modulation of biodiversity in a synthetic chemical-mediated ecosystem. Nat Chem Biol 5:929–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF (2008) The microbial engines that drive earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320:1034–1039

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reichenbach T, Mobilia M, Frey E (2007) Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games. Nature 448:1046–1049

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hart BA, Zahler SA (1966) Lytic enzyme produced by Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 92:1632–1637

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF (2008) Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:18188–18193

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonzalez JE, Marketon MM (2003) Quorum sensing in nitrogen-fixing rhizobia. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:574–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS, West SA (2007) Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450:411–414

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Darch SE, West SA, Winzer K, Diggle SP (2012) Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(21):8259–8263

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pai A, Tanouchi Y, You L (2012) Optimality and robustness in quorum sensing (QS)-mediated regulation of a costly public good enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:19810–19815

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Keller L, Surette MG (2006) Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pai A, You L (2009) Optimal tuning of bacterial sensing potential. Mol Syst Biol 5:286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith RS, Iglewski BH (2003) P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems and virulence. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu J, Miller MB, Vance RE, Dziejman M, Bassler BL, Mekalanos JJ (2002) Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:3129–3134

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamilton W (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97:354–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simpson EH (1951) The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 13:238–241

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Chuang JS, Rivoire O, Leibler S (2009) Simpson’s paradox in a synthetic microbial system. Science 323:272–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chuang JS, Rivoire O, Leibler S (2010) Cooperation and Hamilton’s rule in a simple synthetic microbial system. Mol Syst Biol 6

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tanouchi Y, Pai A, Buchler NE, You L (2012) Programming stress-induced altruistic death in engineered bacteria. Mol Syst Biol 8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zimbelman JD, Palmer AL, Todd JK (1998) Failure of beta-lactam antibiotics (Eagle effect) and superiority of clindamycin in the treatment of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections. Pediatr Res 43:161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stevens DL, Gibbons AE, Bergstrom R, Winn V (1988) The Eagle effect revisited: efficacy of clindamycin, erythromycin, and penicillin in the treatment of Streptococcal myositis. J Infect Dis 158:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Allee W, Emerson A, Park O, Park T, Schmidt K (1949) Principles of animal ecology. W. B. Saunders, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tobin PC, Berec L, Liebhold AM (2011) Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecol Lett 14:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Deredec A, Courchamp F (2007) Importance of the Allee effect for reintroductions. Ecoscience 14:440–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gilligan CA, van den Bosch F (2008) Epidemiological models for invasion and persistence of pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 46:385–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tan C, Smith R, Srimani J, Riccione K, Prasada S, Kuehn M, You L (2012) The inoculum effect and band-pass bacterial response to periodic antibiotic treatment. Mol Syst Biol 8:617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fath G (1998) Propagation failure of traveling waves in a discrete bistable medium. Physica D 116:176–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jonsen ID, Bourchier RS, Roland J (2007) Influence of dispersal, stochasticity, and an Allee effect on the persistence of weed biocontrol introductions. Ecol Model 203:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith R, Tan C, Srimani J, Pai A, Riccione K, Song H, You L (2014) Programmed Allee effect results in a tradeoff between population spread and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:1969–1974

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Phillip Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, R.P., Boudreau, L., You, L. (2015). Engineering Cell-to-Cell Communication to Explore Fundamental Questions in Ecology and Evolution. In: Hagen, S. (eds) The Physical Basis of Bacterial Quorum Communication. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1402-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1402-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1401-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1402-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics