Abstract
The motion of falling bodies was explored by Salviati, Sagredo and Simplicio in the First Day of Galileo’s Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, but this first science was only pursued insofar as it elucidated the second science, the strength of materials. For example, they considered how falling objects are affected by the specific gravity and the cohesion of the material through which they fall. Now, in the Third Day, our friends address the science of falling bodies in earnest, with an eye toward eventually understanding the motion and force of artillery. Salviati begins by referring his listeners to a text in which the author (Galileo himself) defines uniform motion and naturally accelerated motion. These two classes of motion will eventually play a critical role in his subsequent treatment of projectiles. But before simply accepting Galileo’s theory of falling bodies, Sagredo and Simplicio offer a number of objections which Salviati must address. These objections draw on both common-sense observations of falling bodies and the paradoxes involved in Galileo’s attempt to mathematically model their motion. Are they satisfied by Salviati’s reply? Are you?
See now the power of truth; the same experiment which at first glance seemed to show one thing, when more closely examined, assures us of the contrary.
—Galileo Galilei
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Pages /193–197/ of Galileo’s text have been omitted for the sake of brevity. The omitted pages, marked by an ellipsis (…) in the following text, include a number of theorems regarding uniform motion. Among these, only Theorem IV, Proposition IV is included, as it is referred to in a subsequent reading selection.
- 3.
“Natural motion” of the author has here been translated into “free motion”—since this is the term used today to distinguish the “natural” from the “violent” motions of the Renaissance. [Trans.].
- 4.
This is demonstrated in Corollary I on page /211/—[K.K.].
- 5.
Simplicio’s argument is evocative of Zeno’s paradoxes, recounted and discussed by Aristotle in his Physics.—[K.K.].
- 6.
See, or instance, Book I of Aristotle’s On the Heavens. Relevant excerpts are included in Chap. 1 of Vol. I.
- 7.
See, for instance, the discussion of the development of calculus by Leibniz and Newton in Chs. 4 and 5 of Grattan-Guinness, I. (Ed.), Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics 1640–1940, Elsevier, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuehn, K. (2015). Naturally Accelerated Motion. In: A Student's Guide Through the Great Physics Texts. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1366-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1366-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1365-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1366-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)