Abstract
Using the concept of task manifolds, a number of data analysis methods have been used to explain how redundancy influences the structure of variability observed during repeated motor performance. Here we describe investigations that integrate the task manifold perspective with the analysis of Inter-Trial task dynamics. Goal equivalent manifolds (GEMs), together with optimal control ideas, are used to formulate simple models that serve as experimentally testable hypotheses on how Inter-Trial fluctuations are generated and regulated. In an experimental context, these phenomenological models allow us to show how error-correcting control is spatiotemporally organized around a given GEM. To illustrate our approach, we apply it to study the variability observed in a virtual shuffleboard task. The geometric stability properties of the Inter-Trial dynamics near the GEM are extracted from fluctuation time series data. We find that subjects exhibit strong control of fluctuations in an eigendirection transverse to the GEM, whereas they only weakly control fluctuations in an eigendirection nearly, but not exactly, tangent to it. We demonstrate that our dynamical analysis is robust under coordinate transformations, and discuss how our results support a generalized interpretation of the minimum intervention principle that suggests the involvement of competing costs in addition to goal-level error minimization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The Statistical Determinants of Adaptation Rate in Human Reaching. Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1–19.
Cohen R, Sternad D. Variability in Motor Learning: Relocating, Channeling and Reducing Noise. Experimental Brain Research. 2009;193(1):69–83.
Cusumano JP, Cesari P. Body-Goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task. Biological Cybernetics. 2006;94(5):367–379.
Cusumano JP, Dingwell JB. Movement Variability Near Goal Equivalent Manifolds: Fluctuations, Control, and Model-based Analysis. Human Movement Science. 2013;32(5):899–923.
Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CCJ, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. PCA in Studying Coordination and Variability: A Tutorial. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004;19(4):415–428.
Delignières D, Torre K. Fractal Dynamics of Human Gait: A Reassessment of the 1996 Data of Hausdorff et al. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2009;106(4):1272–1279.
Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. Neural Correlates of Reach Errors. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25(43):9919–9931.
Dingwell JB, Cusumano JP. Re-Interpreting Detrended Fluctuation Analyses of Stride-to-Stride Variability in Human Walking. Gait & posture. 2010;32(3):348–353.
Dingwell JB, John J, Cusumano JP. Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking? PLoS Computational Biology. 2010;6(7):e1000856.
Dingwell JB, Smallwood RF, Cusumano JP. Trial-to-trial Dynamics and Learning in a Generalized, Redundant Reaching Task. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2013;109(1):225–237.
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. vol. 57 of CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
Eldar A, Elowitz MB. Functional Roles for Noise in Genetic Circuits. Nature. 2010;467(7312): 167–173.
Faisal AA, Selen LPJ, Wolpert DM. Noise in the Nervous System. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9(4):292–303.
Freedman DA. Bootstrapping Regression Models. The Annals of Statistics. 1981;9(6):1218–1228.
Gao J, Hu J, Tung WW, Cao Y, Sarshar N, Roychowdhury VP. Assessment of Long-Range Correlation in Time Series: How to Avoid Pitfalls. Physical Review E. 2006 January;73:016117.
Golub GH, van Loan CF. Matrix Computations. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press; 1996.
Greenwood DT. Principles of Dynamics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1988.
Guckenheimer J, Holmes P. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. vol. 42 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-Dependent Noise Determines Motor Planning. Nature. 1998;394(6695):780–784.
Hausdorff JM, Peng C, Ladin Z, Wei JY, Goldberger A. Is Walking a Random Walk? Evidence for Long-range Correlations in Stride Interval of Human Gait. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1995;78:349–349.
Hirsch MW, Smale S, Devaney RL. Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos. San Diego: Academic Press; 2004.
John J, Cusumano JP. Inter-Trial Dynamics of Repeated Skilled Movements DETC2007-35380. ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2007;p. 707–716.
Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability. Exercise & Sport Sciences Reviews. 2002;30(1):26–31.
Maraun D, Rust HW, Timmer J. Tempting Long-Memory: on the Interpretation of DFA Results. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. 2004;11(4):495–503.
Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press; 1979.
McDonnell MD, Ward LM. The Benefits of Noise in Neural Systems: Bridging Theory and Experiment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011;12(7):415–426.
Mooney CZ, Duval RD. Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. vol. 95. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993.
Moore EH, Barnard RW. General Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society; 1939.
Müller H, Sternad D. Decomposition of Variability in the Execution of Goal-Oriented Tasks: Three Components of Skill Improvement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2004;30(1):212–233.
Oldfield RC. The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.
Osborne LC, Lisberger SG, Bialek W. A Sensory Source for Motor Variation. Nature. 2005;437(7057):412–416.
Peng CK, Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AL, Havlin S, Sciortino F, Simons M, et al. Long-Range Correlations in Nucleotide Sequences. Nature. 1992;356(6365):168–170.
Poole D. Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2010.
Ranganathan R, Newell K. Motor Learning Through Induced Variability at the Task Goal and Execution Redundancy Levels. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2010;42(5):307–316.
Scholz JP, Schoner G. The Uncontrolled Manifold Concept: Identifying Control Variables For A Functional Task. Experimental Brain Research. 1999;126(3):289–306.
Scholz JP, Schoner G, Latash ML. Identifying the Control Structure of Multijoint Coordination During Pistol Shooting. Experimental Brain Research. 2000;135(3):382–404.
Schöner G, Scholz JP. Analyzing Variance in Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Movements: Uncovering Structure Versus Extracting Correlations. Motor Control. 2007;11(3):259–275.
Scott SH. Optimal Feedback Control and the Neural Basis of Volitional Motor Control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5(7):532–546.
Stein RB, Gossen ER, Jones KE. Neuronal Variabiltiy: Noise or Part of the Signal? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6(5):389–397.
Sternad D, Abe MO, Hu X, Müller H. Neuromotor Noise, Error Tolerance and Velocity-Dependent Costs in Skilled Performance. PLoS Computational Biology. 2011;7(9):e1002159.
Todorov E. Optimality Principles in Sensorimotor Control. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7(9): 907–915.
Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal Feedback Control as a Theory of Motor Coordination. Nature Neuroscience. 2002;5(11):1226–1235.
van Beers RJ. Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise. Neuron. 2009;63(3):406–417.
Warren WH. The Perception-Action Coupling. In: Bloch H, Bertenthal BI, editors. Sensory-Motor Organizations and Development in Infancy and Early Childhood. Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1990. pp. 23–37.
Warren WH. The Dynamics Of Perception and Action. Psychological Review. 2006;113(2): 358–389.
Wilcoxon F. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin. 1945;1(6):80–83.
Acknowledgements
 Partial funding for this project was provided by National Institutes of Health grant 1-R03-HD058942-01 (to JBD) and by National Science Foundation grant 0625764 (to JPC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cusumano, J., Mahoney, J., Dingwell, J. (2014). The Dynamical Analysis of Inter-Trial Fluctuations Near Goal Equivalent Manifolds. In: Levin, M. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 826. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1338-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1338-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1337-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1338-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)