Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Data Treatment of Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Analysis by Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors

Part of the book series: Nanostructure Science and Technology ((NST))

Abstract

The ultimate aim of developing electrochemical sensors or biosensors, EBs, is proposing to the scientific community devices suitable for real sample analysis. It follows that sensor performances should be concretized by proper figures of merit, FM, estimated according to agreed protocols, and reported according to unambiguous formats. As far as we know the most frequently reported FM are those usually estimated in validation studies, e.g., linear range, limits of detection and quantification, precision, trueness, uncertainty, selectivity, and recovery. Of course, developing and testing new EBs seldom need a complete validation study. Most frequently, papers are mainly aimed at reporting details of the method used to prepare the sensor, of experiments used for characterizing its chemical/biochemical/electrochemical/morphological features, and of its potential applications. But, if some analytical performances of the proposed sensor are presented to the reader, then they should be estimated by reliable approaches and allow a reasonably appropriate interpretation. However, while preparing a recent review paper dealing with glassy carbon electrode surface modified by acidic functionalities, it was noticed that quite often some of the reported FM were ill defined or reported in an inadequate format. In such a situation, reconsidering how to estimate and report them might be valuable to any experimentalist involved in developing EBs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EURACHEM (1998) The fitness for purpose of analytical methods. 1st internet version. Available at http://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/valid.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

  2. Desimoni E, Brunetti B (2012) Glassy carbon electrodes film-modified with acidic functionalities. Rev Electroanal 24:1481–1500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Desimoni E, Brunetti B (2013) Presenting analytical performances of electrochemical sensors. Some suggestions. Accred Qual Assur 25:1645–1651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

    Google Scholar 

  5. VAM (2003) Preparation of calibration curves. A guide to best practice. http://www.nmschembio.org.uk/dm_documents/lgcvam2003032_xsjgl.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

  6. ISO (1997) Capability of detection—part 1: terms and definition

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO (2000) Capability of detection—part 2: methodology in the linear calibration case

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO (2003) Capability of detection—part 3: methodology for determination of the critical value for the response variable when no calibration data are used

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson RL (1987) Practical statistics for analytical chemists. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Deming SL et al (2003) Chemometrics: a textbook, 5th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller JN, Miller JN (2005) Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  12. Funk W, Dammann V, Donnevert G (2007) Quality assurance in analytical chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  13. Analytical Method Committee (1988) Uses (proper and improper) of correlation coefficients. Analyst 113:1469–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Loco J, Elskens M, Croux C, Beernaert H (2002) Linearity of calibration curves: use and misuse of the correlation coefficient. Accred Qual Assur 7:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huber W (2004) On the use of the correlation coefficient r for testing the linearity of calibration functions. Accred Qual Assur 9:726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hibbert DB (2005) Further comments on the (miss-)use of r for testing the linearity of calibration functions. Accred Qual Assur 10:300–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Analytical Method Committee (1994) Is my calibration linear? Analyst 119:2363–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller JN (1991) Basic statistical methods for analytical chemistry. Part 2. Calibration and regression methods. A review. Analyst 116:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfassi ZB, Boger Z, Ronen Y (2005) Statistical treatment of analytical data. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Otto M (2007) Chemometrics. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ludbrook J (1997) Comparing methods of measurement. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 24:193– 203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ludbrook J (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29:527–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Warton DJ, Wright IJ, Falster DS et al (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro SS (1990) How to test normality and other distributional assumptions. ASCQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sen A, Srivastava M (1990) Regression analysis theory. Methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Danzer K, Currie LA (1988) Guidelines for calibration in analytical chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 70:993–1014

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gort SM, Hoogerbrugger R (1995) A user-friendly spreadsheet program for calibration using weighted regression. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 28:193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Desimoni E (1999) A program for the weighted linear least-squares regression of unbalanced response arrays. Analyst 124:1191–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal Chem 40:586–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vial J, Jardy A (1999) Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. Anal Chem 71:2672–2677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Montville D, Voightman E (2003) Statistical properties of limit of detection test statistics. Talanta 59:461–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Currie LA (2004) Detection and quantification limits; basic concepts, international harmonization, and outstanding (“low level”) issues. Appl Radiat Isotop 61:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Voigtman E (2008) Limits of detection and decision. Part 1. Spectrochim Acta B 63:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Voigtman E (2008) Limits of detection and decision. Part 2. Spectrochim Acta B 63:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Voigtman E (2008) Limits of detection and decision. Part 3. Spectrochim Acta B 63:142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Voigtman E (2008) Limits of detection and decision. Part 4. Spectrochim Acta B 63:154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Currie LA (1997) Detection: International update, and some emerging di-lemmas involving calibration, the blank, and multiple detection decisions. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 37:151–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Desimoni E, Brunetti B (2009) About estimating the limit of detection of heteroscedastic analytical systems. Anal Chim Acta 655:30–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Currie LA (2001) Some case studies of skewed (and other ab-normal) data distributions arising in low-level environmental research. Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:705–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Huber W (2003) Basic calculations about the limit of detection and its optimal determination. Accred Qual Assur 8:213–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Justino CIL, Rocha-Santos TA, Duarte AC (2010) Review of analytical figures of merit of sensors and biosensors in clinical applications. Trends Anal Chem 29:1172–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Loock H-P, Wenzell PD (2012) Detection limits of chemical sensors: applications and misapplications. Sens Actuators B 173:157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. ISO 5725 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  44. Horwitz W (1983) Today’s chemical realities. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 66:1295–1301

    Google Scholar 

  45. Albert R, Horwitz W (1997) A heuristic derivation of the Horwitz curve. Anal Chem 69:789–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Horwitz H, Albert R (1997) The concept of uncertainty as applied to chemical measurements. Analyst 122:615–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thompson M (2007) Limitations of the application of the Horwitz equation: a rebuttal. Trends Anal Chem 26:659–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cheng CL, Riu J (2006) On estimating linear relationships when both variables are subject to heteroscedastic measurement errors. Technometrics 48:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Alanen E (2012) Everything all right in method comparison studies? Stat Methods Med Res 21:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nawarathna RLS, Choundhary PK (2013) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies with heteroscedastic measurements. Statist Med. doi:10.1002/sim.5955

    Google Scholar 

  51. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide (2012) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd ed. Laboratory of Government Chemist, London. http://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

  52. Measurement uncertainty revisited: alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation. Eurolab Technical Report No. 1/2007, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  53. Den Boef G, Hulanicki A (1983) Recommendations for the usage of selective, selectivity and related terms in analytical chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 55:553–556

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vessman J, Stefan RI, Van Staden JF et al (2001) Selectivity in analytical chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 73:1381–1386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Fajgeli A et al (1999) Harmonized guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement. Pure Appl Chem 71:337–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. EC document SANCO/3030/99 rev.4 11/07/00. Technical material and preparations; guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre- and post registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, Section 5) of Directive 91/414. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/approval_active_substances/docs/wrkdoc13_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

Download references

Acknowledgement

Financial support by COFIN 2010-2011 (Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale, MIUR, 2010AXENJ8_002) is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Elio Desimoni & Barbara Brunetti

Authors
  1. Elio Desimoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Brunetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elio Desimoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Venice, Italy

    Ligia Maria Moretto

  2. Institute of Chemistry, Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria

    Kurt Kalcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desimoni, E., Brunetti, B. (2015). Data Treatment of Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. In: Moretto, L., Kalcher, K. (eds) Environmental Analysis by Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1301-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation