Skip to main content

Fungal Diseases of Groundnut: Control and Future Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future Challenges in Crop Protection Against Fungal Pathogens

Part of the book series: Fungal Biology ((FUNGBIO))

Abstract

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is widely cultivated as a food and oilseed crop. Cultivation of groundnuts offers health and economic benefits but one of the most important challenges faced by groundnut growers is the management of destructive diseases. The crop is susceptible to a variety of plant pathogens like bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes, resulting in poor yields and quality of the produce. Among the most devastating fungal diseases of groundnut are the early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori), late leaf spot (Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Deighton), and groundnut rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.). Soil-borne diseases of groundnut like stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii Saccardo) and crown/collar rot (Aspergillus niger van Tieghem) cause substantial loss to plant stand and yield. Combined yield losses due to incidence of the diseases in groundnut can be as high as 50 %. Many fungicides are available for management of fungal diseases. But application of fungicides throughout the season puts additional burden on the growers. Alternative disease management options like cultural practices, planting resistant cultivars, use of biocontrol agents, etc. can be useful in management of diseases by reducing the frequency of application of fungicides. Integrated disease management (IDM) system consisting of resistant cultivars, improved tillage practices, and cultural practices along with reduced application of chemical fungicides can go a long way in the management of fungal diseases of groundnut. Notwithstanding the availability of several options, the effective control of the fungal diseases in groundnut is still daunting. The situation is going to aggravate further due to climatic changes and emergence of new virulent strains of pathogens. Unless coordinated efforts are made the fungal diseases will continue to cause havoc to groundnut cultivation throughout the cultivated areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrios GN (2005) Effect of host-plant nutrition. In: Plant pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier Academic, Burlington, MA, pp 257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambang Z, Ngoh Dooh JP, Essono G, Bekolo N, Chewachong G, Asseng CC (2010) Effect of Thevetia peruviana seeds extract on in vitro growth of four strains of Phytophthora megakarya. Plant Omics J 3:70–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ambang Z, Ndongo B, Essono G, Ngoh JP, Kosma P, Chewachong GM, Asanga A (2011) Control of leaf spot disease caused by Cercospora sp. on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) using methanolic extracts of yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) seeds. Austr J Crop Sci 5:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman PA, Brenneman TB (1997) Stem rot. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 36–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird RE, Brenneman TB, Bell DK, Murphy AP (1991) The effects of the fungicide propiconazole (Tilt) on the groundnut shell mycobiota. Mycol Res 95:571–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baring MR, Simpson CE, Burow MD, Black MC, Cason JM, Ayers J, Lopez Y, Melouk HA (2006) Registration of ‘Tamrun OL07’ peanut. Crop Sci 46:2721–2722

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett DW, Clough JM, Godwin JR, Hall AA, Hamer M, Parr-Dobrzanski B (2002) The strobilurin fungicides. Pest Manag Sci 58:649–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beute MK (1997) Pythium diseases. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen L, Hagan AK, Weeks JR (1997) Number of tebuconazole applications for maximizing disease control and yield of peanut in growers’ fields in Alabama. Plant Dis 81:927–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch WD, Brenneman TB (2009) Field evaluation for the combination of white mould and tomato spotted wilt disease resistance among peanut. Crop Prot 28:595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman TB (1997) Rhizoctonia diseases. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman TB, Sumner HR, Chandler LR, Hammond JM, Culbreath AK (1994) Effect of application techniques on performance of propiconazole for peanut disease control. Peanut Sci 21:134–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman TB, Culbreath AK, Holbrook CC (2005) Screening cultivars and advanced germplasm for multiple disease resistance. In: Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Education Society 37: article 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Butzler TM, Bailey J, Beute MK (1998) Integrated management of Sclerotinia blight in peanut: utilizing canopy morphology, mechanical pruning, and fungicide timing. Plant Dis 82:1312–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csinos AS (1984) Evaluation of the insecticide chlorpyrifos for activity against southern stem rot on peanuts. Peanut Sci 11:98–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Csinos AS (1987) Control of southern stem rot and Rhizoctonia limb rot of peanut with flutolanil. Peanut Sci 14:55–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filonow AB, Jackson KE (1989) Effect of metalaxyl plus PCNB or metalaxyl plus tolclofos-methyl on peanut pod rot and soil populations of Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani. Peanut Sci 16:25–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2007) Statistical database of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). www.fao.org/waicent/portal/statistics_en.asp

  • Ganesan S, Kuppusamy RG, Sekar R (2007) Integrated management of stem rot disease (Sclerotium rolfsii) of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using Rhizobium and Trichoderma harzianum (ITCC-4572)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghewande MP, Desai S, Basu MS (2002) Diagnosis and management of major diseases of groundnut. Bulletin, National Research Centre for Groundnut, Junagadh, Gujarat, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbet DW, Kucharek TA, Shokes FM, Brenneman TB (2004) Field evaluations of peanut germplasm for resistance to stem rot caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. Peanut Sci 31:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gremillion (2007) Contributions to management of diseases of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) through Bolivian-derived host resistance, integrated disease management and knowledge of pathogen variability. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Grichar WJ (1995) Management of stem rot of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) caused by Sclerotium rolfsii with fungicides. Crop Prot 14:111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grichar WJ, Besler BA, Jaks AJ (2000) Use of azoxystrobin for disease control in Texas peanut. Peanut Sci 27:83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraj J, Ramabadran R (1999) Rhizobium-Trichoderma interaction in vivo and in vitro. Indian Phytopathol 52:190–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney MIT, Marinelli A, Oddino C, March GJ (2002) Transmission and dispersal of Sphaceloma arachidis by crop debris and seed from infected peanut. Peanut Sci 29:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langston DB Jr, Phipps PM, Stipes RJ (2002) An algorithm for predicting outbreaks of Sclerotinia blight of peanut and improving the timing of fungicide sprays. Plant Dis 86:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis PI, Filonow AB (1990) Reaction of peanut cultivars to Pythium pod rot and their influence on populations of Pythium spp. in soil. Peanut Sci 17:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayee CD (1995) Current status and future approaches for management of groundnut disease in India. Indian Phytopathol 48:389–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayee CD, Datar VV (1988) Diseases of groundnut in the tropics. Rev Trop Plant Pathol 5:169–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Melouk HA, Damicone JP (1997) Verticillium wilt. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 37–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande S, Bandyopadhyay R, Blümmel M, Narayana Rao J, Thomas D, Navi SS (2003) Disease management factors influencing yield and quality of sorghum and groundnut crop residues. Field Crop Res 84:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RD, Sturz AV, Carter MR, Sanderson JB (2003) Developing disease-suppressive soils through crop rotation and tillage management practices. Soil Till Res 72:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter DM (1997a) The peanut plant. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter DM (1997b) Botrytis blight. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter DM, Melouk HA (1997) Sclerotinia blight. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Punja ZK (1985) The biology, ecology, and control of Sclerotium rolfsii. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:97–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout SL, Brenneman TB, Culbreath AK, Langston DB Jr (2008) Evaluation of weather-based spray advisories for improved control of peanut stem rot. Plant Dis 92:392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shew BB, Wynne JC, Beute MK (1987) Field, microplot, and greenhouse evaluations of resistance to Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut. Plant Dis 71:188–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim MY, Starr JL, Keller NP, Woodard KE, Lee TA Jr (1998) Distribution of isolates of Sclerotium rolfsii tolerant to pentachloronitrobenzene in Texas peanut fields. Plant Dis 82:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokes FM, Culbreath AK (1997) Early and late leaf spots. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BW (1950) Arachis hypogaea. Aerial flower and subterranean fruit. Am J Bot 37:802–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DH (1984) Early and late leaf spots. In: Porter DM, Smith DH, Rodriguez-Kabana R (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases. APS, St. Paul, MN, pp 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam P, McDonald D (1983) Rust disease of groundnut. ICRISAT Information Bulletin no. 13, Patancheru, AP

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam P, Wongkaew S, Reddy DVR, Demski JW, McDonald D, Sharma SB, Smith DH (1992) Field diagnosis of groundnut diseases. ICRISAT Information Bulletin no. 36, Patancheru, AP

    Google Scholar 

  • Syngenta (2012) Omega fungicide. http://www.syngentacropprotection.com/prodrender/index.aspx?prodid=632

  • Thiessen LD, Woodward JE (2012) Diseases of peanut caused by soil-borne pathogens in the southwestern United States. ISRN Agronomy vol 2012, Article ID 517905, 9 page. doi:10.5402/2012/517905

  • Vasavirama K, Kirti PB (2012) Increased resistance to late leaf spot disease in transgenic peanut using a combination of PR genes. Funct Integr Genomics 12:625–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker ME, Csinos AS (1980) Effect of gypsum on yield, grade and incidence of pod rot in five peanut cultivars. Peanut Sci 7:109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZR, Wang KC, Fang SM, Guo JM, Wang YS, Xiong WJ, Lin HL, Wang DH (2006) Screening of peanut germplasm for resistance to peanut scab. Fujian Agric Sci Technol 21(4):313–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CT, Wang XZ, Tang YY, Chen DX, Zhang JC, Cui FG, Yu SL (2009) Cloning of the 18S rDNA sequence from Sphaceloma arachidis, the causal pathogen of groundnut scab. J SAT Agric Res 7:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells JC, Phipps PM (1997) Peanut disease guide North Carolina and Virginia. Center for Integrated Pest Management. http://ipm.ncsu.edu/peanuts/diseases/guide/contents.html

  • Wheeler TA, Howell CR, Cotton J, Porter D (2005) Pythium species associated with pod rot on West Texas peanuts and in vitro sensitivity of isolates to mefenoxam and azoxystrobin. Peanut Sci 32:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward JE, Brenneman TB, Kemerait RC, Culbreath AK, Clark JR (2006) First report of Sclerotinia blight caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorium on peanut in Georgia. Plant Dis 90:article 111

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XJ (ed) (2009) Compendium of diseases, pests and weeds in peanut field in China. China Agricultural, Beijing, 443 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal Krishna Pal Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pal, K.K., Dey, R., Tilak, K.V.B.R. (2014). Fungal Diseases of Groundnut: Control and Future Challenges. In: Goyal, A., Manoharachary, C. (eds) Future Challenges in Crop Protection Against Fungal Pathogens. Fungal Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1188-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics