Advertisement

Optimal Intake and Routing of Floating Oil Rigs in the North Sea

  • Dag HauglandEmail author
  • Bjørn Peter Tjøstheim
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 212)

Abstract

For oil and gas fields in production in the North Sea, a key task is to maximize the profit made by recovery and processing of oil/gas reserves. A main source of increased hydrocarbon off-take is through wells, which can be either producers or injectors (gas or water). The choice of technology for field development depends upon key parameters like the size of the field and water depth, and several different layouts are possible. This chapter considers the problem of optimizing the returns from investments in, and operation of offshore oil and gas fields, and develops approaches for solving it using integer programming models.

Keywords

Location Model Injection Well Valid Inequality Drilling Operation Integer Programming Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Statoil ASA is gratefully acknowledged for letting the second author work on the problem under study for his master thesis. Methods developed and examples used in this chapter do not necessarily express Statoil’s current disposal of rigs.

Supplementary material

273578_1_En_13_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (46 kb)
(pdf 46 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Carvalho, M. C. A., & Pinto, J. M. (2006). An MILP model and solution technique for the planning of infrastructure in offshore oilfields. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 23(1), 67–82.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, V., & Grossmann, I. E. (2012). An efficient multiperiod MINLP model for optimal planning of offshore oil and gas field infrastructure. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(19), 6823–6840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haugland, D., Hallefjord, Å., & Asheim, H. (1988). Models for petroleum field exploitation. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(1), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haugland, D., Jörnsten, K., & Shayan, E. (1991). Modeling petroleum fields with movable platforms. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 15(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iyer, R. R., Grossmann, I. E., Vasantharajan, S., et al. (1998). Optimal planning and scheduling of offshore oil field infrastructure investment and operations. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 37(4), 1380–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin, X., & Floudas, C. A. (2003). A novel continuous-time modeling and optimization framework for well platform planning problems. Optimization and Engineering, 4(1–2), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ortiz-Gomez, A., Rico-Ramirez, V., & Hernandez-Castro, S. (2002). Mixed-integer multiperiod model for the planning of oilfield production. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 26(4–5), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tjøstheim, B. P. (2009). Optimization of the centralized rig intake process in Statoil. Master thesis in petroleum business engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van den Heever, S. A., Grossmann, I. E., Vasantharajan, S., et al. (2000). Integrating complex economic objectives with the design and planning of offshore oilfield infrastructures. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 24(2–7), 1049–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Statoil ASABergenNorway

Personalised recommendations