Skip to main content

Image Registration for Multimodality Small-Animal Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Molecular Imaging of Small Animals
  • 1310 Accesses

Abstract

Since the discovery of X-rays, imaging has been a vital component of clinical medicine. Increasingly, in vivo imaging of small laboratory animals, i.e. mice and rats, has emerged as an important component of basic biomedical research as well. Historically, clinical and laboratory imaging modalities have often been divided into two general categories, structural (or anatomical) and functional (or physiological). Anatomical modalities, i.e. depicting primarily morphology, include X-rays (plain radiography), CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), and US (ultrasound). Functional modalities, i.e. depicting primarily information related to underlying genetics and metabolism, include (planar) scintigraphy, SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography), PET (positron emission tomography), MRS/MRSI (magnetic resonance spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging), fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), and, in small animals, optical (i.e. bioluminescence and fluorescence) imaging modalities. The functional modalities form the basis of the rapidly advancing field of “molecular imaging,” defined as the direct or indirect non-invasive monitoring and recording of the spatial and temporal distribution of in vivo molecular, genetic, and/or cellular processes for biochemical, biological, diagnostic, or therapeutic applications [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The analogy between signal entropy, used in the context of mutual information, and thermodynamic entropy thus becomes clear.

  2. 2.

    In information theory, there are actually a number of different definitions of mutual information.

References

  1. RSNA News, RSNA, SNM urge interdisciplinary cooperation to advance molecular imaging, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zanzonico P. and Heller H. Developments in instrumentation. Seminars Nucl Med, vol. 38, pp. 149–222, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Zanzonico. Multimodality image registration and fusion. In Dhawan AP, Huang HK, and Kim DS (Eds), Principles and Advanced Methods in Medical Imaging and Image Analysis, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 413–435, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.F. Hutton, M. Braun, L. Thurfjell, et al. Image registration: An essential tool for nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med, vol. 29, pp. 559–577, 2002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.B.A. Maintz and M.A. Viergever, “A survey of medical image registration,” Med Image Anal, vol. 2, pp. 1–36, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J.V. Hajnal, D.L.G. Hill DLG, and D.J. Hawkes DJ (Eds.). Medical image registration, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.L.G. Hill, P.G. Batchelor, M. Holden, et al. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol, vol. 46, pp. R1–R45, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Radiology, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. ACR-NEMA Digital Imaging and Communications Standard. NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1985, Washington, DC, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Radiology, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. ACR-NEMA Digital Imaging and Communications Standard: Version 2.0. NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1988, Washington, DC, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): Version 3.0. Draft Standard, ACR-NEMA Committee, Working Group VI, Washington, DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Mildenberger, M. Eichelberg, and E. Martin. Introduction to the DICOM standard. Eur Radiol, vol. 12, pp. 920–927, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Viola and W.M. Wells III. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Inter J Computer Vision, vol. 22, pp. 137–154, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Zanzonico and S.A. Nehmeh. Introduction to clinical and laboratory (small-animal) image registration and fusion. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc, vol. 1, pp. 1580–1583, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B.J. Pichler, H.F. Wehrl, A. Kolb, et al. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging? Seminars Nucl Med, vol. 38, pp. 199–208, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zanzonico P, Campa J, Polycarpe-Holman D ,et al, Animal-specific positioning molds for registration of repeat imaging studies: Comparative microPET™ imaging of F18-labeled fluoro-deoxyglucose and fluoro-misonidazole in rodent tumors. Nucl Med Biol, vol. 33, pp. 65–70, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J.L. Humm, D. Ballon, J. Hu, et al. A stereotactic method for the three-dimensional registration of multi-modality biologic images in animals: NMR, PET, histology, and autoradiograph. Med Physics, vol. 30, pp. 2303–2314, 2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Cho, E. Ackerstaff E, S. Carlin S, et al. Noninvasive multimodality imaging of the tumor microenvironment: registered dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography studies of a preclinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia. Neoplasia, vol. 11, pp. 247–259. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. U.Hoffmann, G.Brix, M.V.Knopp, et al. Pharmokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magnet Resonance Med, vol. 33, pp. 506–514, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat Zanzonico .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zanzonico, P. (2014). Image Registration for Multimodality Small-Animal Imaging. In: Zaidi, H. (eds) Molecular Imaging of Small Animals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0894-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics