Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary Issues and Collaboration in Assessment and Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Aided Augmentative Communication for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Part of the book series: Autism and Child Psychopathology Series ((ACPS))

Abstract

Issues of communication, core symptom presentation, effects on challenging behaviors and comorbid psychopathology, and school performance are interrelated. This chapter provides professionals with guidance regarding the range of professionals that may be necessary on interdisciplinary teams serving individuals with ASD and CCN. Roles of these team members and of family members and individuals with ASD and CCN are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelo, D. H. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. R., Thompson, J. R., Kosuwan, K., & Prochnow, J. M. (2010). The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents’ attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 572–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L. J., & Fager, S. (2008). An AAC personnel framework: Adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 255–267. doi:10.1080/07434610802388477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binger, C., Ball, L., Dietz, A., Kent-Walsh, J., Lasker, J., Lund, S., & Quach, W. (2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 278–288. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.716079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bopp, K. D., Brown, K. E., & Mirenda, P. (2004). Speech-language pathologists’ roles in the delivery of positive behavior support for individuals with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 5–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calculator, S. N., & Black, T. (2009). Validation of an inventory of best practices in the provision of augmentative and alternative communication services to students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 329–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella-Malone, H., DeBar, R. M., & Sigafoos, J. (2009). An examination of preference for augmentative and alternative communication devices with two boys with significant intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 262–273. doi:10.3109/07434610903384511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delarosa, E., Horner, S., Eisenberg, C., Ball, L., Renzoni, A. M., & Ryan, S. E. (2012). Family impact of assistive technology scale: Development of a measurement scale for parents of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 171–180. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, A., Quach, W., Lund, S. K., & McKelvey, M. (2012). AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: The impact of experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 148–159. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, K. A., & Katz, L. A. (2008). Augmentative and alternative communication and literacy teams: Facing the challenges, forging ahead. Seminars in Speech & Language, 29, 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, E. H., McNaughton, D. B., & Drager, K. D. R. (2009). “All children can and should have the opportunity to learn”: General education teachers’ perspectives on including children with autism spectrum disorder who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 110–122. doi:10.1080/07434610902886206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. W. (1994). Effects of synthetic voice output attitudes toward the augmented communicator. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 64–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grether, S. M., & Sickman, L. S. (2008). AAC and RTI: Building classroom-based strategies for every child in the classroom. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 155–163. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1079129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hustad, K. C., Keppner, K., Schanz, A., & Berg, A. (2008). Augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children: Intervention goals and use of technology. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 83–91. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1080754.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kent-Walsh, J., Stark, C., & Binger, C. (2008). Tales from school trenches: AAC service-delivery and professional expertise. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 146–154. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1079128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2005). The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: The evaluation of a peer-training program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 278–294. doi:10.1080/07434610500103467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, J., Dewit, D. J., King, G., Mille, L. T., & Killip, S. (2004). High school-aged youths’ attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 51, 287–313. doi:10.1080/1034912042000259242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSheehan, M., Sonnenmeier, R. M., Jorgensen, C. M., & Turner, K. (2006). Beyond communication access: Promoting learning of the general education curriculum by students with significant disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 26, 266–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parette, H. P., & Marr, D. D. (1997). Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J. (1999). Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K., Beukelman, D., & Bird, A. (1998). Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, A., Alberto, P., Fredrick, L., Heflin, L., & Heller, K. (2002). Preference variability and the instruction of choice making with students with severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1422–1431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). ICF-CY, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth version. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ganz, J.B. (2014). Interdisciplinary Issues and Collaboration in Assessment and Treatment. In: Aided Augmentative Communication for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0814-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics