Abstract
The Warburg effect is a quality of cancer cells which is so defining of them that it is considered an important emerging hallmark of disease. Discovered by Dr. Otto Warburg in the 1920s, it was not until the last decade that the importance of this phenomenon was more widely realised and exploited in medical research, and its future possibilities conceived, largely due to an increase in our understanding of cellular metabolism. The Warburg effect itself is an observed change in the metabolism of cancer cells, where they metabolise a much larger amount of glucose than normal cells, utilising aerobic glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation. While aerobic glycolysis creates less ATP energy for the cell it creates metabolic products, which allows the tumour to increase its biomass, important for the growth of the tumour and its ability to metastasize. Although it is still unknown why this metabolic change occurs, it is driven, at least in part, by the actions of activated oncogenes, in particular HIF-1α, and suppression of tumour suppressor proteins, such as p53. This quality provides the basis for the cancer monitoring technique of positron emission tomography, and there are emerging drugs which take advantage of this change from normal cells for potential therapeutic benefits. For example, metabolic drugs such as the type II diabetes drug metformin are being investigated and trialled as tools to starve cancer cells of their large energy requirements. In this chapter we provide an outline of the molecular characteristics of the Warburg effect and discuss related potential therapeutic developments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adekola K, Rosen ST, Shanmugam M (2012) Glucose transporters in cancer metabolism. Curr Opin Oncol 24:650–654
Alirol E, Martinou JC (2006) Mitochondria and cancer: is there a morphological connection? Oncogene 25:4706–4716
Barron C, Tsiani E, Tsakiridis T (2012) Expression of the glucose transporters GLUT1, GLUT3, GLUT4 and GLUT12 in human cancer cells. BMC Proc 6:1
Bayley JP, Devilee P (2012) The Warburg effect in 2012. Curr Opin Oncol 24:62–67
Boonstra J, Post JA (2004) Molecular events associated with reactive oxygen species and cell cycle progression in mammalian cells. Gene 337:1–13
Busk M, Horsman MR, Jakobsen S, Bussink J, Van Der Kogel A, Overgaard J (2008) Cellular uptake of PET tracers of glucose metabolism and hypoxia and their linkage. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:2294–2303
Chaneton B, Gottlieb E (2012) Rocking cell metabolism: revised functions of the key glycolytic regulator PKM2 in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 37:309–316
Chen J-Q, Russo J (2012) Dysregulation of glucose transport, glycolysis, TCA cycle and glutaminolysis by oncogenes and tumor suppressors in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1826:370–384
Chiaradonna F, Moresco RM, Airoldi C, Gaglio D, Palorini R, Nicotra F, Messa C, Alberghina L (2012) From cancer metabolism to new biomarkers and drug targets. Biotechnol Adv 30:30–51
Dang CV (2010) Rethinking the Warburg effect with Myc micromanaging glutamine metabolism. Cancer Res 70:859–862
Dang C (2012) Links between metabolism and cancer. Genes Dev 26:877–890
Dang CV, Kim J-W, Gao P, Yustein J (2008) The interplay between MYC and HIF in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8:51–56
Deberardinis RJ (2008) Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea. Genet Med 10:767–777
Diaz-Ruiz R, Rigoulet M, Devin A (2011) The Warburg and Crabtree effects: on the origin of cancer cell energy metabolism and of yeast glucose repression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1807:568–576
Droge W (2002) Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev 82:47–95
Falasca M (2010) PI3K/Akt signalling pathway specific inhibitors: a novel strategy to sensitize cancer cells to anti-cancer drugs. Curr Pharm Des 16:1410–1416
Ferguson E, Rathmell J (2009) New roles for pyruvate kinase M2: working out the Warburg effect. Trends Biochem Sci 33:359–362
Fiske VH (2012) Seeing the Warburg effect in the developing retina. Nat Cell Biol 14:790–791
Gallagher BM, Fowler JS, Gutterson NI, Macgregor RR, Wan CN, Wolf AP (1978) Metabolic trapping as a principle of oradiopharmaceutical design: some factors responsible for the biodistribution of [18F] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose. J Nucl Med 19:1154–1161
Ganapathy V, Thangaraju M, Prasad PD (2009) Nutrient transporters in cancer: relevance to Warburg hypothesis and beyond. Pharmacol Ther 121:29–40
Gao P, Zhang H, Dinavahi R, Li F, Xiang Y, Raman V et al (2007) HIF dependent antitumorigenic effect of antioxidants in vivo. Cancer Cell 12:230–238
Guertin DA, Sabatini DM (2007) Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell 12:9–22
Hamanaka R, Chandel N (2011) Warburg effect and redox balance. Science 334:1219–1220
Harris A (2002) Hypoxia—a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer 2:38–47
Hsu PP, Sabatini DM (2008) Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell 134:703–707
Kaelin W (2002) Molecular basis of the VHL hereditary cancer syndrome. Nat Rev Cancer 2:673–682
Kim J, Dang C (2006) Cancer’s molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927–8930
Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV (2011) Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 11:325–337
Kroemer G, Pouyssegur J (2008) Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell 13:472–482
Krzeslak A, Jozwiak P, Forma E, Brys M, Wozniak P, Wikosz J, Lipinski M, Rozanski W (2012a) Diagnostic value of glucose transporter 1 and 3 (GLUT1 and GLUT3) mRNA level in postmenopausal women with urinary bladder cancer. Przegl Menopauzalny 3:178–182
Krzeslak A, Wojcik-Krowiranda K, Forma E, Jozwiak P, Romanowicz H, Bienkiewicz A, Brys M (2012b) Expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3 glucose transporters in endometrial and breast cancers. Pathol Oncol Res 18:721–728
Kwee T, Basu S, Saboury B, Ambrosini V, Torigian D, Alavi A (2011) A new dimension of FDG-PET interpretation: assessment of tumor biology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:1158–1170
Lee C, Raffaghello L, Brandhorst S, Safdie FM, Bianchi G, Martin-Montalvo A, Pistoia V, Wei M, Hwang S, Merlino A, Emionite L, De Cabo R, Longo VD (2012) Fasting cycles retard growth of tumors and sensitize a range of cancer cell types to chemotherapy. Sci Transl Med 4:124ra27
Levine A (1997) p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88:323–331
Levine A, Puzio-Kuter A (2010) The control of the metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Science 330:1340–1344
Li J, Shi M, Cao Y, Yuan W, Pang T, Li B, Sun Z, Chen L, Zhao RC (2006) Knockdown of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells results in reduced tumor growth and increased sensitivity to methotrexate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:1341–1351
Locasale J, Cantley L, Vander Heiden M (2009) Cancer’s insatiable appetite. Nature 27:916–917
Lucignani G, Larson SM (2010) Doctor, what does my future hold? The prognostic value of FDG-PET in solid tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1032–1038
Luo W, Semenza G (2012) Emerging roles of PKM2 in cell metabolism and cancer progression. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23:560–566
Macheda MEA (2005) Molecular and cellular regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins in cancer. J Cell Physiol 202:654–662
Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME et al (1999) The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399:271–275
Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ (2001) Activation of the HIF pathway in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11:293–299
Medina RA, Owen GI (2002) Glucose transporters: expression, regulation and cancer. Biol Res 35:9–26
Medina RA, Southworth R, Fuller W, Garlick PB (2002) Lactate-induced translocation of GLUT1 and GLUT4 is not mediated by phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway in the rat heart. Basic Res Cardiol 97:168–176
Mendez O, Zavadil J, Esencay M, Lukyanov Y, Santovasi D, Wang SC, Newcomb EW, Zagzag D (2010) Knock down of HIF-1alpha in glioma cells reduces migration in vitro and invasion in vivo and impairs their ability to form tumor spheres. Mol Cancer 9:133
Milane L, Duan Z, Amiji M (2011a) Role of hypoxia and glycolysis in the development of multi-drug resistance in human tumor cells and the establishment of an orthotopic multi-drug resistant tumor model in nude mice using hypoxic pre-conditioning. Cancer Cell Int 11:3
Milane L, Ganesh S, Shah S, Duan Z-F, Amiji M (2011b) Multi-modal strategies for overcoming tumor drug resistance: hypoxia, the Warburg effect, stem cells, and multifunctional nanotechnology. J Control Release 155:237–247
Pedersen PL (2007) The cancer cell’s “power plants” as promising therapeutic targets: an overview. J Bioenerg Biomembr 39:1–12
Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Grabocka E, Bar-Sagi D (2011) RAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web. Nat Rev Cancer 11:761–774
Resendis-Antonio O, Checa A, Encarnación S (2010) Modeling core metabolism in cancer cells: surveying the topology underlying the Warburg effect. PLoS One 5:1–11
Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Marín-Hernández A, Gallardo-Pérez JC, Moreno-Sánchez R (2009) Kinetics of transport and phosphorylation of glucose in cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 221:552–559
Rogers S, Docherty SE, Slavin JL, Henderson MA, Best JD (2003) Differential expression of GLUT12 in breast cancer and normal breast tissue. Cancer Lett 193:225–233
Semenza GL (2001) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: oxygen homeostasis and disease pathophysiology. Trends Mol Med 7:345–350
Semenza G (2003) Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3:721–732
Shim H, Dolde C, Lewis BC, Wu C-S, Dang G, Jungmann RA, Dalla-Favera R, Dang CV (1997) c-Myc transactivation of LDH-A: implications for tumor metabolism and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:6658–6653
Stubbs M, Griffiths JR (2010) The altered metabolism of tumors: HIF-1 and its role in the Warburg effect. Adv Enzyme Regul 50:44–55
Van Ginkel RJ, Hoekstra HJ, Pruim J, Nieweg OE, Molenaar WM, Paans AM, Willemsen AT, Vaalburg W, Koops HS (1996) FDG-PET to evaluate response to hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. J Nucl Med 37:984–990
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029–1033
Warburg O (1924) Uber den Stoffwechsel der Carcinomzelle. Naturwissenschaften 12:1131–1137
Wenger JB, Chun SY, Dang DYT, Luesch H, Dang LH (2011) Combination therapy targeting cancer metabolism. Med Hypotheses 76:169–172
Wolf A, Agnihotri S, Micallef J, Mukherjee J, Sabha N, Cairns R, Hawkins C, Guha A (2011) Hexokinase 2 is a key mediator of aerobic glycolysis and promotes tumor growth in human glioblastoma multiforme. J Exp Med 208:313–326
Xu R, Pelicano H, Zhou Y, Carew J, Feng L, Bhalla K, Keating M, Huang P (2005) Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: a novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia. Cancer Res 65:613–621
Yacovan A, Ozeri R, Kehat T, Mirilashvili S, Sherman D, Aizikovich A, Shitrit A, Ben-Zeev E, Schutz N, Bohana-Kashtan O, Konson A, Behar V, Becker OM (2012) 1-(Sulfonyl)-5-(arylsulfonyl)indoline as activators of the tumor cell specific M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22:6460–6468
Yanagawa T, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, Takagishi K (2010) Usefulness of FDG PET in primary bone tumors. Open Bone J 2:19–23
Yeoa E-J, Chunb Y-S, Parka J-W (2004) New anticancer strategies targeting HIF-1. Biochem Pharmacol 68:1061–1069
Yeung SJ, Pan J, Lee MH (2008) Roles of p53, MYC and HIF-1 in regulating glycolysis—the seventh hallmark of cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:3981–3999
Yijun C, Cairns R, Papandreou I, Koong A, Denko NC (2009) Oxygen consumption can regulate the growth of tumors, a new perspective on the Warburg effect. PLoS One 4:1–9
Zawacka-Pankau J, Grinkevich VV, Hünten S, Nikulenkov F, Gluch A, Li H, Enge M, Kel A, Selivanova G (2011) Inhibition of glycolytic enzymes mediated by pharmacologically activated p53: targeting Warburg effect to fight cancer. J Biol Chem 286:41600–41615
Zhang X-D, Qin Z-H, Wang J (2010) The role of p53 in cell metabolism. Acta Pharmacol Sin 31:1208–1212
Zhong H, De Marzo AM, Laughner E, Lim M, Hilton DA, Zagzag D, Buechler P, Isaacs WB, Semenza GL, Simons JW (1999) Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in common human cancers and their metastases. Cancer Res 59:5830–5835
Zhou M, Zhao Y, Ding Y, Liu H, Liu Z, Fodstad O, Riker AI, Kamarajugadda S, Lu J, Owen LB, Ledoux SP, Tan M (2010) Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes taxol-resistant cancer cells to taxol. Mol Cancer 9:33
Acknowledgments
The support of the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering is acknowledged. T.C.K. was the recipient of AINSE awards. T.C.K. is a Future Fellow and Epigenomic Medicine Laboratory is supported by the Australian Research Council. This work was supported in part by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balding, E., Ververis, K., Karagiannis, T.C. (2014). Molecular Aspects of the Warburg Effect. In: Maulik, N., Karagiannis, T. (eds) Molecular mechanisms and physiology of disease. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0706-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0706-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0705-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0706-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)