Skip to main content

Lexical Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Language
  • 1713 Accesses

Abstract

Different philosophical, linguistic, and cognitive accounts have been proposed to describe the structure of the mental lexicon. In particular, the question about how lexical meanings are mentally represented and computed has been controversially discussed. We believe that most accounts add valuable information for drawing a valid cognitive map, but favor in particular the constructionist account. We emphasize here that lexical meanings are constructed based on a schematic mental space, and as such the mental lexicon can be considered as a highly dynamic and interactive system. This approach matches well with lexical network models. They assume that lexical meanings are computed in a 3D mental space taking account of a variety of different context information including schematic and common sense knowledge representations. We conclude that lexical meanings can be best described as internal mental states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 301–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L. (2011). Lexical knowledge without a lexicon? Mental Lexicon, 6(1), 1–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1975) The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics. The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Gloucestershire: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. (1974). The effect of some and all on reaction time for semantic decisions. Memory & Cognition, 2(3), 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A., Hyde, M. R., & Theurkauf, J. C. (1986). Category specific dissociations in naming and recognition by aphasic patients. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 22(1), 87–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in the motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillert, D. (1992). Lexical semantics and aphasia: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 7(1), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). The mental representation of the meaning of words. Cognition, 25, 189–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C. J. Bailey & R. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation. (In English) (pp. 340–373). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89–115. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Levin, B. (1991). Lexical and conceptual semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorisation (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale: Erlhaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1972). A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization and memory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP Research Group, C. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. B., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Langacker, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32(2), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain: a journal of neurology, 107, 829–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen [German]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Hillert .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hillert, D. (2014). Lexical Concepts. In: The Nature of Language. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0609-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics