Skip to main content

Field Deployments: Knowing from Using in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Researchers deploy systems, typically robust prototypes, to users in situ for a number of purposes: to assess changes in behavior, to gather feedback on how to improve the system, to influence the attitude of the population to adopt the final system in the future. Researchers collect both quantitative data (e.g., frequency of use) and qualitative data (e.g., observations and interviews about situations of use and attitudes), and thus, this method is associated with a number of other methods in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brush, A. J. B., Inkpen, K., & Tee, K. (2008). SPARCS: Exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2008) (pp. 629–638).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., & Mankoff, J. (2005). Prototypes in the wild: Lessons learned from evaluating three Ubicomp systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(4), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29(8), 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, K., Siek, K. A., Chaudry, B., Jones, J., Astroth, K., & Welch, J. L. (2012). An offline mobile nutrition monitoring intervention for varying literacy patients receiving hemodialysis: A pilot study examining usage and usability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(5), 705–712. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M. Y., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., et al. (2007). Conducting in situ evaluations for and with ubiquitous computing technologies. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 22(1–2), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D. W., Avrahami, D., Froehlich, J., LeGrand, L., et al. (2008). Flowers or a robot army?: Encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 54–63).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, M., Hirano, S. H., Tentori, M., Yeganyan, M. T., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). Classroom-based assistive technology: Collective use of interactive visual schedules by students with autism. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11) (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2008, San Diego, CA (pp. 711–720).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T., Smith, D. N., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M., Richards, J. T., & Bradner, E. (1999). Socially translucent systems: Social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “Babble”. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999) (pp. 72–79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Favela, J., Tentori, M., & Gonzalez, V. M. (2010). Ecological validity and pervasiveness in the evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies for healthcare. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 26(5), 414–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 904-908). Santa Monica: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, G. R. (2011, August). The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(3), Article 15, 20 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, G. R., Poole, E. S., Iachello, G., Patel, S. N., Grimes, A., Abowd, G. D., et al. (2007). Physical, social, and experiential knowledge in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(4), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlewood, W. R., Stolterman, E., & Connelly, K. (2011). Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: Two case studies. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 877–886).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, S., Yeganyan, M., Marcu, G., Nguyen, D., Boyd, L. A., & Hayes, G. R. (2010).vSked: Evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) (pp. 1633–1642).

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, D. U., Ananthanarayan, S., & Siek, K. A. (2011). Exploring everyday health routines of a low socioeconomic population through multimedia elicitations. Journal of Participatory Medicine, 3, e39. 10 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Dantec, C. A., & Edwards, W. K. (2008). Designs on dignity: perceptions of technology among the homeless. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 627–636). doi:10.1145/1357054.1357155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D. S. (2002). Transcript of a video history interview with Jeff Hawkins, Founder, Chairman and Chief Product Officer Handspring [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Computerworld Honors Program International Archives site: http://www.cwhonors.org/archives/histories/hawkins.pdf

  • Newman, M. W., Ducheneaut, N., Edwards, W. K., Sedivy, J. Z., & Smith, F. (2007). Supporting the unremarkable: Experiences with the obje display mirror. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(7), 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, & Practice, 19(3), 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, J., & Consolvo, S. (2004). Toward a framework for evaluating ubiquitous computing applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing Magazine, 3, 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengers, P., & Gaver, B. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ‘06), New York, NY, USA (pp. 99–108). doi:10.1145/1142405.1142422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2003). Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24(2), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication (learning in doing: Social cognitive and computational perspectives). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmon, J., Ammenwerth, E., Brender, J., de Keizer, N., Nykänen, P., & Rigby, M. (2009). STARE-HI–Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. P., Hirano, S. H., Cheng, K. C., & Hayes, G. R. (2012). Balancing caregiver and clinician needs in a mobile health informatics tool for preterm infants. In 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. C., & Isaacs, E. (1993). Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia supported collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(3), 163–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. C., Isaacs, E. A., & Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) ‘94, Chapel Hill, NC (pp. 23–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. C., Matthews, T., Cerruti, J. A., Dill, S., Wilcox, E., Schoudt, J., et al. (2009, February). Global differences in attributes of email usage. International Workshop on Intercultural Collaboration (IWIC 2009), Stanford, CA, (pp. 185–194).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tentori, M., & Favela, J. (2008). Collaboration and coordination in hospital work through Activity-aware Computing. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 17(4), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., & Kellogg, W. A. (1989). Minimizing ecological gaps in interface design. IEEE Software, 6(1), 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G., Lee, B., et al. (2010). Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010) (pp. 1049–1058).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S., Matthews, T., Cerruti, J. A., Badenes, H., & Tang, J. C. (2011). Am I wasting my time organizing email?: A study of email refinding. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011) (pp. 3449–3458).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, K., Newman, M. W., Veinot, T. C., Kim, H., Meadowbrooke, C. C., & Perry, E. E. (2010). Using online peer-mentoring to empower young adults with end-stage renal disease: A feasibility study. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie A. Siek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siek, K.A., Hayes, G.R., Newman, M.W., Tang, J.C. (2014). Field Deployments: Knowing from Using in Context. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics