Skip to main content

Research Ethics and HCI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ways of Knowing in HCI

Abstract

The expansion of human–computer interaction (HCI) to every aspect of human activity creates new challenges to the core ethical mandates of doing no harm, maintaining respect for people who participate in our studies, and weighing the costs and benefits of research, making sure that they are distributed fairly over the population. Online research adds further complications. This chapter reviews the ethical challenges and helps researchers prepare their cases for the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    IRB members employed by state institutions may be protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Exact laws vary by state. See Bordas (1984) for a detailed discussion.

References

  • (1949). Trials of war criminals before the nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Retrieved June 13, 2012 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html

  • ACM (1992). ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. Retrieved Jue 13, 2012 from http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics

  • Bardzell, S. & Bardzell J. (2011). Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. Proceedings of CHI (pp. 675–684). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B. & Quinn A. (2011). Web workers unite! addressing challenges of online laborers. Proceedings of alt.CHI. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmont. (1979). The belmont report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M. (2004). Internet research: Privacy, ethics and alienation—An open source approach. Internet Research, 14(4), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordas, L. (1984). Tort Liability of Institutional Review Boards. West Virginia Law Review, 87(1), 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borning, A. & Muller M. (2012). Next steps for value sensitive design. Proceedings of CHI (pp. 1125–1134). Austin, TX: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. (2012). Interviewing members of online communities: A practical guide to recruiting participants. In A. Hollingshead & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams (pp. 199–210). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2011). The Tuskegee Timeline. Retrieved October 31, 2012 from http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

  • Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. Partcipatory Design Conference (pp. 92–101). Indianapolis, IN: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. (2002). Internet research ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. & T. A. E. W. Committee (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research, Association of Internet Researchers. 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. (1996). Value-Sensitive Design. ACM Interactions, 3, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. (2006). Value-sensitive design and information systems. In P. Z. Dennis Galletta (Ed.), Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Applications (pp. 348–372). New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., et al. (2008). The network in the garden. Proceedings of CHI. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, G. R. & Abowd G. (2006). Tensions in designing capture technologies for an evidence-based care community. Proceedings of CHI (pp. 937–946). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, G. R., Kientz, J. et al. (2004). Designing capture applications to support the education of children with autism. Proceedings of UbiComp. Tokyo, Japan: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. (1996). LInguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. The Information Society, 12, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, J. (1999). Writers, texts, and writing acts: Gendered user images in word processing software. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2004). “Go Away”: Participant objectiions to being studied. The Information Society, 20(2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (2012). Software engineering code of ethics and professional practice. Retrieved June 13, 2012 from http://www.computer.org/portal/web/certification/resources/code_of_ethics

  • Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork for the metaphysic of morals. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2012). Personal communication to A. Munich, Germany: Bruckmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Olson, J., et al. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDantec, C. A. & Edwards, W. K. (2008). Designs on dignity: Perceptions of technology among the homeless. Proceedings of CHI (pp. 627–636). Florence, Italy: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamykina, L. & Mynatt, E. (2007). Proceedings of Healthnet (pp. 49–54). San Juan, Puerto Rico: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Manier, J. (1999). UIC suspended from doing most human research. Chicago, IL, Tribune Company: Chicago Tribune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. (2012). Personal communication to A. Munich, Germany: Bruckmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • OHRP (2001). US Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. United States Federal Code. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm

  • OHRP (2012). Compliance oversight, determination letters. From http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/letters/index.html

  • Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, M. S., Ross, J. et al. (2010). Sellers' problems in human computation markets. Proceedings of KDD-HCOMP (pp. 18–21). Washington, DC: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • UNLV (2012). History of research ethics. Retrieved June 13, 2012 from http://research.unlv.edu/ORI-HSR/history-ethics.html

  • Weiss, R. (1999). US halts human research at duke. Washington, DC: The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Bruckman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruckman, A. (2014). Research Ethics and HCI. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics