Skip to main content

A Canadian Perspective on a Child’s Consent to Research Within a Context of Family-Centred Care: From Incompatibility to Synergy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paediatric Patient and Family-Centred Care: Ethical and Legal Issues

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 57))

  • 2812 Accesses

Abstract

Two major trends have developed in paediatric bioethics: family-centred care and increased recognition of emerging autonomy through legal and policy entrenched rights. The different foci of their corresponding healthcare delivery models (“family-centred” or “patient-/child-centred”) create the potential for conflict in the context of seeking consent to research or, as will be presented, the possibility of integration. Given the state of current bioethical principles and legal holdings, the paediatric patient should ultimately be the primary focus of ethical consideration and, at least in the context of dissenting to research, the child’s autonomous wishes should reign. However, in recognizing and supporting a child’s emerging autonomy, the family context should be respected and taken into account. This discussion articulates the values underpinning these two important trends in paediatric healthcare delivery, and proposes a model for obtaining consent for paediatric research in the current context.

The content of this chapter was previously published April 24, 2012: Sheahan L, Da Silva M, Czoli C, Zlotnik Shaul R (2012) A Canadian Perspective on a Child’s Consent to Research within a Context of Family-Centered Care: From Incompatibility to Synergy.

J Clinic Res Bioeth 3:132. doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000132.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blake, V., S. Joffe, and E. Kodish. 2011. Harmonization of ethics policies in pediatric research. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39:70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, L. 2009. Early childhood service delivery for families living with childhood disability: Disabling families through problematic implicit ideology. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 34:14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 1998 (with 2000, 2002, 2005 amendments).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2), December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B. 2008. Commentary on Shields L, Pratt J & Hunter J (2006) Family centered care: A review of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17:2091–2093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, B. J. 1988. Autonomy and long term care: some crucial distinctions. The Gerontologist 28:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Bioethics. 1995. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in paediatric practice. Committee on bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Paediatrics 95:314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. 2008. Patients and families. Healthcare Executive 23:60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985. c. C-46, Section 215 rev 1991 (cited 27 March 2008). http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-46/sec215.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2012.

  • Diekema, D. S., M. R. Mercurio, and M. B. Adam. 2011. Clinical ethics in pediatrics: A case-based textbook, 2–3. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, L.S., and P. Callery. 2004. Re-thinking family-centered care across the continuum of children’s healthcare. Child: Care, Health and Development 30:265–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care. ND Core concepts. Institute for Family-Centered Care, Bethesda, MD. http://www.ipfcc.org/pdf/CoreConcepts.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Institute for Patient and Family-Centered Care. 2011 Advancing the practice of patient- and family-centered care: How to get started. Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, Bethesda, MD. www.ipfcc.org/pdf/getting_started.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. 2010. Interagency advisory panel on research ethics, table of concordance. 1st ed. 1998 to 2nd ed. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. 2008. Partnering with patients and families to design a patient- and family-centered health care system: Recommendations and promising practices. Institute for Family-Centered Care, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., E. Seale Jeppson, and L. Redburn. 1992. Caring for children and families: Guidelines for hospitals. Bethesda: Association for the Care of Children’s Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, P., M. Hayden Bellin, and D. Fauri. 2006. Family-centered care: A resource for social work in end-of-life and palliative care. Journal of Social Work in End-of- Life & Palliative Care 2:13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, V. 2009. Response to Carter, B (2008) Commentary on Shields L, Pratt J, Hunter J (2006) Family centred care: A review of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15, 1317–1323 in Journal of Clinical Nursing 17, 2091–2093. Journal of Clinical Nursing 18:623–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locsin, R. 2003. Culture perspectives. Holistic Nursing Practice 17:ix–xii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKean, G., W. Thurston, and C. M. Scott. 2005. Bridging the divide between families and health professionals’ perspectives on family-centered care. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 8:74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigel, M. 1998. Guidelines for family-centered research. Washington, DC: ACCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. 2003. Children, ethics & modern medicine. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. B., and N. P. Kenny 2002. Walking the moral tightrope: Respecting and protecting children in health related research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics: CQ: The International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees 11:217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. 1993. Care of sick children by parents: A meaningful role. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18:185–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Personal Health Information Protection Act. 2004. SO 2004, c 3, Sch A s. 23 of PHIPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan, L., M. Da Silva, C. Czoli, and R. Zlotnik Shaul. 2012. A Canadian perspective on a child’s consent to research within a context of family-centered care: From incompatibility to synergy. Journal of Clinical Research Bioethics 3:132. doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, L. 2011. The ethics of family-centered care for hospitalised children. In Ethical and Philosophical Aspects of Nursing Children and Young People, eds. G. Brykczyńska, and J. Simons, 144–154. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, L., J. Pratt, and J. Hunter. 2006. Family centered care: A review of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15:1317–1323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C. 2003. Children and research participation: Who makes what decisions. Health Law Review 11:20–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sodomka, P. 2006. Engaging patients & families: A High leverage tool for health care leaders. Hospitals and Health Network: 28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. G. 2006. Advanced Practice Nurses in a Medical Home. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing: JSPN 11:203–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Sheahan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheahan, L., Da Silva, M., Czoli, C., Zlotnik Shaul, R. (2014). A Canadian Perspective on a Child’s Consent to Research Within a Context of Family-Centred Care: From Incompatibility to Synergy. In: Zlotnik Shaul, R. (eds) Paediatric Patient and Family-Centred Care: Ethical and Legal Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 57. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0323-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0323-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0322-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0323-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics