Abstract
In this chapter, we continue our discussion of equating with nonequivalent groups with a presentation of equipercentile methods. Including the use of smoothing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The basic idea is to find a linear transformation of observed scores to estimated true scores such that the estimates have a variance equal to true score variance.
- 2.
Note that if \(\rho _1(V,V') = \rho _2(V,V')\), then \(v_1 = v_2 + [\mu _2(V) - \mu _1(V)]/\sqrt{\rho _1(V,V')}\).
- 3.
The CIPE computer program and EQUATING RECIPES can be used for FE. In addition, EQUATING RECIPES provides results for MFE and chained equipercentile equating.
References
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorridike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508–600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Braun, H. I., & Holland, P. W. (1982). Observed-score test equating: A mathematical analysis of some ETS equating procedures. In P. W. Holland & D. B. Rubin (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 9–49). New York: Academic.
Brennan, R. L., & Lee, W. (2006). Correcting for bias in single-administration decision consistency indexes. Iowa City, IA: Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Iowa. Available on http://www.education.uiowa.edu/centers/casma. (CASMA Research Report No. 18)
Chen, H., & Holland, P. W. (2010). New equating methods and their relationships with Levine observed score linear equating under the kernel equating framework. Psychometrika, 75, 542–557.
Chen, H., Livingston, S. A., & Holland, P. W. (2011). Generalized equating functions for NEAT designs. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 185–200). New York: Springer.
Dorans, N. J. (1990). Equating methods and sampling designs. Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 3–17.
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Hagge, S. L., & Kolen, M. J. (2011). Equating mixed-format tests with format representative and non-representative common items. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 1). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.1) (pp. 95–135). Iowa City, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Hagge, S. L., & Kolen, M. J. (2012). Effects of group differences on equating using operational and pseudo-tests. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 2). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.2) (pp. 45–86). Iowa CIty, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Hanson, B. A. (1991). A comparison of bivariate smoothing methods in common-item equipercentile equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 391–408.
Harris, D. J., & Kolen, M. J. (1990). A comparison of two equipercentile equating methods for common item equating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 61–71.
Holland, P. W., Sinharay, S., von Davier, A. A., & Han, N. (2008). An approach to evaluating the missing data assumptions of the chain and post-stratification equating methods for the NEAT design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 17–43.
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1987). Notes on the use of log-linear models for fitting discrete probability distributions. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (Technical Report 87–79)
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1989). The kernel method of equating score distributions. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (Technical Report 89–84)
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2000). Univariate and bivariate loglinear models for discrete test score distributions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 133–183.
Jarjoura, D., & Kolen, M. J. (1985). Standard errors of equipercentile equating for the common item nonequivalent populations design. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 143–160.
Karabatsos, G., & Walker, S. (2009). A Bayesian nonparametric approach to test equating. Psychometrika, 74, 211–232.
Karabatsos, G., & Walker, S. (2011). A Bayesian nonparameteric model for test equating. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 175–184). New York: Springer.
Kolen, M. J., & Jarjoura, D. (1987). Analytic smoothing for equipercentile equating under the common item nonequivalent populations design. Psychometrika, 52, 43–59.
Lee, W., He, Y., Hagge, S. L., Wang, W., & Kolen, M. J. (2012). Equating mixed-format tests using dichotomous common items. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 2). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.2) (pp. 13–44). Iowa CIty, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Liou, M., & Cheng, P. E. (1995). Equipercentile equating via data-imputation techniques. Psychometrika, 60, 119–136.
Liu, C., & Kolen, M. J. (2011). A comparison among IRT equating methods and traditional equating methods for mixed-format tests. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 1). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.1) (pp. 75–94). Iowa City, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Livingston, S. A. (1993). Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 23–39.
Livingston, S. A., Dorans, N. J., & Wright, N. K. (1990). What combination of sampling and equating methods works best? Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 73–95.
Livingston, S. A., & Feryok, N. J. (1987). Univariate vs. bivariate smoothing in frequency estimation equating. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (Research Report 87–36)
Lord, F. M. (1965). A strong true score theory with applications. Psychometrika, 30, 239–270.
Marco, G. L., Petersen, N. S., & Stewart, E. E. (1983). A test of the adequacy of curvilinear score equating models. In D. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing (pp. 147–176). New York: Academic.
Moses, T., & Holland, P. W. (2010a). The effects of selection strategies for bivariate loglinear smoothing models on NEAT equating functions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 76–91.
Moses, T., & Holland, P. W. (2010b). A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 557–574.
Powers, S. J., Hagge, S. L., Wang, W., He, Y., Liu, C., & Kolen, M. J. (2011). Effects of group differences on mixed-format equating. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 1). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.1) (pp. 51–73). Iowa City, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Powers, S. J., & Kolen, M. J. (2011). Evaluating equating accuracy and assumptions for groups that differ in performance. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 1). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.1) (pp. 137–175). Iowa City, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Powers, S. J., & Kolen, M. J. (2012). Using matched samples equating methods to improve equating accuracy. In M. J. Kolen & W. Lee (Eds.), Mixed-format tests: Psychometric properties with a primary focus on equating (volume 2). (CASMA Monograph Number 2.2) (pp. 87–114). Iowa CIty, IA: CASMA, The University of Iowa.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Thayer, D. (1987). Smoothing the joint and marginal distributions of scored two-way contingency tables in test equating. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 40, 43–49.
Sinharay, S. (2011). Chain equipercentile equating and frequency estimation equipercentile equating: Comparisons based on real and simulated data. In N. J. Dorans & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Looking Back: Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of Paul W. Holland. Lecture Notes in Statistics 202 (pp. 203–219). New York: Springer.
Sinharay, S., & Holland, P. W. (2010a). The missing data assumptions of the NEAT design and their implications for test equating. Psychometrika, 75, 309–327.
Sinharay, S., & Holland, P. W. (2010b). A new approach to comparing several equating methods in the context of the NEAT design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 261–285.
Sinharay, S., Holland, P. W., & von Davier, A. A. (2011). Evaluating the missing data assumptions of the chain and poststratification equating methods. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 281–296). New York: Springer.
von Davier, A. A., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2004a). The kernel method of test equating. New York: Springer.
von Davier, A. A., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2004b). The chain and post-stratification methods for observed-score equating: Their relationship to population invariance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 15–32.
Wang, T., & Brennan, R. L. (2006). A modified frequency estimation equating method for the common-item non-equivalent groups design. Iowa City, IA: Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Iowa. Available on http://www.education.uiowa.edu/centers/casma (CASMA Research Report No. 19)
Wang, T., & Brennan, R. L. (2009). A modified frequency estimation equating method for the common-item non-equivalent groups design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 118–132.
Wang, T., Lee, W., Brennan, R. L., & Kolen, M. J. (2008). A comparison of the frequency estimation and chained equipercentile methods under the common-item non-equivalent groups design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 632–651.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kolen, M.J., Brennan, R.L. (2014). Nonequivalent Groups: Equipercentile Methods. In: Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0316-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0317-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)