Skip to main content

Introduction and Related Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data-driven Generation of Policies

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Computer Science ((BRIEFSCOMPUTER))

  • 649 Accesses

Abstract

A large number of well known data sets in the social sciences have a tabular form. Each row refers to a period of time, and each column represents a variable that characterizes the state of some entity during a time period. These variables naturally divide into those actionable variables we can control (which we will call “action variables”) and those we cannot (which we will call “state variables”). For example, data sets regarding school performance for various U.S. states contain “state variables” such as the graduation rate of students in the state and the student to staff ratio during some time frame, while the “action” variables might refer to the level of funding provided per student during that time frame, the faculty salary levels during that time period, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://data.nytimes.com/

  2. 2.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/data

References

  1. Chitta Baral and Le chi Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In AAAI 2002, pages 507–512. AAAI Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matthias Broecheler, Gerardo I. Simari, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Using histograms to better answer queries to probabilistic logic programs. In Patricia Hill and David Warren, editors, Proceedings of ICLP 2009, volume 5649, pages 40–54. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Baker, J. Tenenbaum, and R. Saxe. Bayesian models of human action understanding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 18:99, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Davies and T.R. Gurr. Preventive Measures: Building Risk Assessment and Crisis Early Warning Systems. Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Center for International Development and Conflict Management. Minorities at risk organizational behavior dataset, minorities at risk project, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar.

  6. Samir Khuller, Maria Vanina Martinez, Dana Nau, Gerardo Simari, Amy Sliva, and VS Subrahmanian. Computing most probable worlds of action probabilistic logic programs: Scalable estimation for 1030, 000 worlds. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 51(2–4):295–331, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Kolodner and C.B. Reasoning. Morgan kaufmann. San Mateo, CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tom M. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dana Nau, Malik Ghallab, and Paolo Traverso. Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Judea Pearl. Reasoning with cause and effect. AI Mag., 23(1):95–111, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerardo I. Simari, John P. Dickerson, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Cost-based query answering in probabilistic logic programs. In Proceedings of SUM 2010. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerardo I. Simari, John P. Dickerson, Amy Sliva, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Parallel abductive query answering in probabilistic logic programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, In Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jana Shakarian. The CMOT Codebook, available from the Laboratory for Computational Cultural Dynamics, University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Extended and revised by Schuetzle, B. and Nagel, M., 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerardo I. Simari, Maria Vanina Martinez, Amy Sliva, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Focused most probable world computations in probabilistic logic programs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 64(2–3):113–143, March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gerardo I. Simari and V.S. Subrahmanian. Abductive inference in probabilistic logic programs. 7:192–201, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, A., Simari, G.I., Sliva, A., Subrahmanian, V.S. (2014). Introduction and Related Work. In: Data-driven Generation of Policies. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0274-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0274-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0273-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0274-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics