Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 1290 Accesses

Abstract

Single-incision slings (SIS) are the third generation of midurethral slings dedicated to the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. SIS seek to mimic the efficacy of the traditional retropubic and transobturator slings, yet lower the risk of major organ and vessel injury by avoiding the passage of trocars through the retropubic or transobturator space. Placed via a single vaginal incision, SIS also aim to limit morbidity by avoiding external incisions, reducing postoperative pain, and affording the opportunity for placement under local anesthesia. Studies of currently available SIS show mixed results with regard to efficacy, and further study of this new generation of slings is warranted. This chapter highlights the important differences in design and surgical placement of the most popular SIS on the market, as well as reviews available outcomes data for each sling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPICONT Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1150–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lara C, Nacey J. Ethnic differences between Maori, Pacific Island and European New Zealand women in prevalence and attitudes to urinary incontinence. N Z Med J. 1994;107:374–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Minassian V, Stewart WF, Wood GC. Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. BJU Int. 2002;89:61–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chong EC, Khan AA, Anger JT. The financial burden of stress urinary incontinence among women in the united States. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anger JT, Weinberg AE, et al. Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2009;74(2):283–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Reqapour M. A three-year follow up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atherton M, Stanton S. The tension-free vaginal tape reviewed: an evidence-based review from inception to current status. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:534–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003;44:724–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;6:1306–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, et al. Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barber M, Kleeman S, Karram M, et al. Transoburator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:611–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barry C, Lim Y, Muller R, et al. A multicentre randomized clinical controlled trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach vs the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(3):284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsson C, Palva K, Rezapour M, et al. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1043–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspensions as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2002;325:67.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grise P, Droupy S, Saussine C, et al. Transobturator sling for female stress incontinence with polypropylene tape and outside in procedure: prospective study with 1 year follow up and review of transobturator tape sling. Urology. 2006;68:759–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Leval J, Waltregny D. New surgical technique for treatment of stress urinary incontinence TVT-Obturator: new developments and results. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:212–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davila G, Johnson J, Serels D. Multicenter experience with the Monarc transobturator sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:460–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barry C, Lim Y, Muller R, et al. A multicentre randomized clinical controlled trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach vs the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2008;19:171–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, et al. TVT-Secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multicentre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2009;20:313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Neuman M. Perioperative complications and early follow up with 100 TVT-Secur procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:480–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rezapour M, Novara G, Meier PA, et al. 3-month preclinical trial to assess the performance of a new TVT-like mesh (TVTx) in a sheep model. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baracat F, Iglesias R, Pessoa R, et al. Unfavorable immediate outcome with the TVT Secure sling in twenty consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2008;179(4):535–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karram M, Lucente V, Khandwala S, et al. An evaluation of the Gynecare TVT Secur System (tension-free support for incontinence) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence [abstract]. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18 Suppl 1:004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neuman M, Shaare-Zedek MC. Training TVT Secur: the first 150 teaching operations [abstract]. Int Urogyn J. 2007;18 Suppl 1:045.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martan A, Masata J, Svabik K. Initial experience with TVT-Secur System procedure and the reason for persistent stress urinary incontinence [abstract]. Int Urogyn J. 2007;18 Suppl 1:044.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marsh FA, Assassa P. An audit of the introduction of TVT Secur in clinical practice [abstract]. Int Urogyn J. 2007;18 Suppl 1:043.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Albrich S, Naumann G, Skala C, et al. TVT Secur® First experiences after a follow-up of 17 months [abstract]. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saltz SM, Haff RE, Lucente VR. Short-term assessment of patients undergoing the new tension free vaginal tape Secur procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence [abstract]. Int Urogyn J. 2007;18 Suppl 1:046.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Debodinance P, Lagrange E, et al. TVT-Secur: more and more minimal invasive—preliminary prospective study on 40 cases [abstract]. Int Urogyn J. 2007;8 Suppl 1:239.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Molden S, Lucente V. New Minimally Invasive Slings: TVT Secur. Curr Urol Rep. 2008;9:358–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liapas A, et al. Comparison of the TVT SECUR System “hammock” and “U” tape positions for management of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):233–6. Epub 2010 Sep 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim JJ, Lee YS, Lee KS. Randomized comparative study of the U- and H-type approaches of the TVT-Secur procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: one-year follow-up. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(4):250–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee KS, Choo MS, Doo CK, Han DH, Lee YS, Kim JY, et al. The long term (5-years) objective TVT success rate does not depend on predictive factors at multivariate analysis: a multicentre retrospective study. Eur Urol. 2008;53:176–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gagnon LO, le Tu M. Better short-term outcomes with the U-method compared with the Hammock technique for the implantation of the TVT-SECUR under local anesthesia. Urology. 2010;75(5):1060–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Walsh CA. TVT-Secur mini-sling for stress urinary incontinence: a review of outcomes at 12 months. BJU Int. 2011;108(5):652–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dmochowski RR, Grier D, Franco N, et al. One year results from a World-Wide Registry of TVT-SECUR™ in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181:544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abdel-Fattah M, Ford JA, Lim CP, Madhuvrata P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):468–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cornu JN, Sebe P, Peyrat L, et al. Midterm prospective evaluation of TVT-Secur reveals high failure rate. Eur Urol. 2010;58:157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Neuman M, Sosnovski V, Kais M, et al. Transobturator vs single-incision suburethral mini-slings for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: early postoperative pain and 3-year follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(6):769–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hinoul P, Vervest HA, den Boon J, et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2011;185(4):1356–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Moore RD, Serels DR, Davila GW, et al. Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and mini-sling. Surg Technol Int. 2009;18:157–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Howard D, Miller JM, Delancey JL, et al. Differential effects of cough, valsalva, and continence status on vesical neck movement. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR. Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the miniarc single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int. 2009;18:175–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kennelly MJ, Moore RD, Nguyen JN, et al. Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;184(2):604–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pickens RB, Klein FA, Mobley III JD, White WM. Single incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2010;77:321–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D, Van der Aa F. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(7):773–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hogewoning CR, Ruhe IM, Bekker MD. The MiniArc sling for female stress urinary incontinence: clinical results after 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):589–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gauruder-Burmester A, Popken G. The MiniArc sling system in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35:334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Debodinance P, Delporte P. MiniArc: preliminary prospective study on 72 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2009;38:144–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Serels S, Douso M, Short G. Preliminary findings with the Solyx single-incision sling system in female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):557–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Abdel-Fattah M, Agur W, Abdel-All M, et al. Prospective multi-centre study of adjustable single-incision mini-sling (Ajust(®)) in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: 1-year follow-up study. BJU Int. 2012;109(6):880–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Baccichet R, et al. Short-term outcomes with the AjustTM system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/ObstetricsandGynecologyDevices/UCM271769.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Kennelly M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennelly, M.J., Selph, J.P. (2014). Female SUI: Single-Incision Slings. In: Badlani, G. (eds) Minimally Invasive Therapy for Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0008-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0008-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0007-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0008-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics