Advertisement

The Essential Role of Pedagogical Knowledge in Technology Integration for Transformative Teaching and Learning

  • Susan N. Kushner Benson
  • Cheryl L. Ward
  • Xin Liang
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors contend that in an era in which technology applications and usage have exploded; technology integration has not been fully realized. They begin the chapter by providing a brief description of a critical time period from the 1980s to 1990s, when computer technology use exploded in classrooms and educational settings. They explain that during this time, the quest for technology integration got side-tracked, taking the path toward technology skills professional development rather than a more essential route toward student learning. They then present some of the research from the 1990s that examined the impact of technology on learning, eventually serving as a catalyst for the development of the TPACK framework. Finally, they summarize their own work, in which pedagogical knowledge has emerged as the key factor in promoting technology integration that supports transformative learning and teaching practices, and conclude with recommendations for professional practice.

Keywords

Pedagogical knowledge Professional development Technology Integration TPACK Transformative learning Transformative practice 

References

  1. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–449. doi: 10.3102/00346543053004445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02299088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Doering, A., Scharber, C., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2009). GeoThentic: Designing and assessing with technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(3), 316–336.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, J. (2008). TPCK in-service education: Assisting experienced teachers’ “planned improvisations”. In AACTE Committee in Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 251–271). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, J. & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, 99-10.Google Scholar
  8. Herrington, J., Herrington, A., Mantei, J., Olney, I., & Ferry, B. (2009). New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/newtech/
  9. Hilton, J., III, Graham, C., Rich, P., & Wiley, D. (2010). Using online technologies to extend a classroom to learners at a distance. Distance Education, 31(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). TPACK reference library. Retrieved from http://www.tpack.org/tpck.index.php?title=Reference_Library
  13. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22–28.Google Scholar
  14. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: An imperative for educational reform. Retrieved from http://datacenter.spps.org/uploads/SOTW_A_Nation_at_Risk_1983.pdf
  15. Okojie, M., Olinzock, A., & Okojie-Boulder, T. (2006). The pedagogy of technology integration. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(2), 66–71.Google Scholar
  16. Polly, D., & Barbour, M. (2009). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in mathematics. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education international conference 2009 (pp. 4128–4131). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  17. Saettler, P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology (2nd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of educational technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Retrieved from http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME161.pdf
  19. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  21. Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Van Merrienboer, J., & Driscoll, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, R. M., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. The Thomas Edison Papers. (2012). Rutgers University. Retrieved from http://edison.rutgers.edu/connect.htm
  24. Veletsianos, G. (2011). Designing opportunities for transformation with emerging technologies. Educational Technology, 51(2), 41–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan N. Kushner Benson
    • 1
  • Cheryl L. Ward
    • 1
  • Xin Liang
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations