Skip to main content

Optimization in Natural Resources Conservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Application of Threshold Concepts in Natural Resource Decision Making

Abstract

The previous three chapters of this book have been devoted to specific components of informed decision processes: objectives, potential actions, model(s) predicting system change and response to potential actions, and monitoring to provide estimates of system status. The final component of an informed decision process is a solution algorithm, providing a means for deciding which potential action to take. Optimization algorithms provide an objective and transparent approach to select the action that will do the best job of meeting objectives. Static optimization provides a solution to decision problems that are not iterative, and we provide examples for one or more decision variables (variables that are components of potential actions). Many decision problems in natural resource management are best viewed as dynamic, in that they are iterative and require decisions that are repeated through time. In dynamic decision problems, decisions made at one point in time are expected to influence system state of the next time step, thus influencing the state-dependent decision at that time. For any specific decision, dynamic optimization algorithms must thus consider all subsequent time steps for the time horizon of the decision problem. In addition to being dynamic, most decision problems in natural resource management are characterized by substantial uncertainty, and dynamic optimization algorithms have been extended to deal with several sources of uncertainty. An important source is uncertainty about how the system responds to management actions, and we may develop multiple models to characterize this uncertainty. Adaptive dynamic optimization algorithms provide solutions that deal not only with objectives, but with the anticipated reduction in uncertainty that will characterize future decisions. The output of an optimization algorithm is frequently a graph or table of recommended actions for specific values of system state variables. Decision thresholds are thus defined by the optimization algorithm and are simply locations in state space where a small change in the value of a state variable produces a change in the optimal or recommended management action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, C. R., K. L. Pope, and J. J. Fontaine, eds. 2011. Adaptive management for natural resources. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1339–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim, Y. 2002. Info-gap decision theory: Decisions under severe uncertainty. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, D. P. 1995. Dynamic programming and optimal control: Volumes I and II. Belmont: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A. E., and Y.-C. Ho. 1975. Applied optimal control: Optimization, estimation, and control. Bristol: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, L., and R. M. Randall. 1998. Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, F. S., and G. J. Lieberman. 2001. Introduction to operations research. 7th ed. New York: McGrw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., ed. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelbling, L. P., M. L. Littman, and A. R. Cassandra. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101:99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. M. 1989. Bayesian statistics: An introduction. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R. J., and M. T. Collins. 2007. Managing the risk of uncertain threshold response: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Analysis 27:1009–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. 1984. Linear and nonlinear programming. 2nd ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J., M. C. Runge, J. D. Nichols, B. C. Lubow, and W. L. Kendall. 2009. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. Ecological Applications 19:1079–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E. 2000. Optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:573–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., M. J. Eaton, and J. Martin. In press. Thresholds for conservation and management: Structured decision making as a conceptual framework. In Thresholds for conservation, ed. G. Gunterspergen and P. Geissler. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., M. D. Koneff, P. J. Heglund, M. G. Knutson, M. E. Seamans, J. E. Lyons, J. M. Morton, M. T. Jones, G. S. Boomer, and B. K. Williams. 2011. Climate change, uncertainty and natural resource management. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., and B. K. Williams. 2012. Adaptive management. In Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 2nd ed. (pp. 1–6), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puterman, M. L. 1994. Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runge, M. C., and T. Walshe. In press. Identifying objectives and alternative actions to frame a decision problem. In Thresholds for conservation, ed. G. Guntenspergen and P. Geissler. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A. P. and C. C. White. 1977. Optimum systems control. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, R. F. 1994. Optimal control and estimation. New York: Dover Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. Caldwell: Blackburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. 2007. Optimal management of non-Markovian biological populations. Ecological Modelling 200:234–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. 2009. Markov decision processes in natural resources management: Observability and uncertainty. Ecological Modelling 220:830–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. 2011. Adaptive management of natural resources: Framework and issues. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1346–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., and F. A. Johnson. 1995. Adaptive management and the regulation of waterfowl harvests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., J. D. Nichols, and M. J. Conroy. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, and C. D. Shapiro. 2007. Adaptive management: The U.S. department of the interior technical guide. Washington, DC: Adaptive Management Working Group (U.S. Department of the Interior).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Nichols .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, B., Nichols, J. (2014). Optimization in Natural Resources Conservation. In: Guntenspergen, G. (eds) Application of Threshold Concepts in Natural Resource Decision Making. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics