Advertisement

Social Interventions and Justice

Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

An important aspect of the community-based philosophy is the issue of justice. This theme was first relevant during the 1960s, when communities were demanding to be treated with dignity. Both around the world and in the USA, demonstrations erupted against the war in Vietnam and many types of discrimination. More recently, however, the topic of justice arose within the context of globalization (Nussbaum, Oxford Development Studies 32(1):3–18, 2004). Many of the protests against this economic and cultural trend have had the retrieval of justice as their key principle. The charge of these movements is that globalization has created a situation where justice has little value. As a result of certain economic policies, the social world seems to be a very hostile and unequal place. For example, vital institutions appear to cater mostly to the rich, while the gap between this class and the rest, in most societies, is expanding (Smart, Economy, culture, and society: A critique of neo-liberalism, 2003). The basic organizations of society are beyond the control of most persons. And as mentioned in the introduction to this book, a credibility gap is prevalent that fosters cynicism and withdrawal. Many communities are caught in the midst of this process and are beginning to deteriorate. And similar to the 1960s, these groups are seeking dignity and some control over their lives (Piven and Cloward, Poor people’s movements, 1979). But a new wrinkle has appeared in this argument. The proponents of change contend that the usual response to this condition is insufficient. That is, the standard forms of charity are considered to be demeaning and ineffective, since this reaction is mostly personal and emotional, with few, if any, obligations. Indeed, charity represents acts of kindness that often require little more than expressions of concern about the condition of many unfortunate persons. In this regard, universal benevolence is deemed to be sufficient to solve the ills related, for example, to poverty or the absence of health care (Tronto, Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care, 1993).

Keywords

Justice vs. charity Liberation Globalization and loss of dignity Humanistic development Kantian maxim Utopianism Embodied morality 

References

  1. Baker, E., & Brownson, C. A. (1998). Defining characteristics of community-based health promotion programs. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 4(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, B. (2005). Why social justice matters. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. (1983). On the obsolescence of the concept of honour. In S. Hauerwas & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), Revisions: Changing perspectives in moral philosophy (pp. 172–181). Norte Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boff, L. (2001). Ética Planetaria desde el Sur. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
  5. Buber, M. (1957). Pointing the way. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Buettner-Schmidt, K., & Lobo, M. L. (2012). Social justice: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(4), 948–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capeheart, L., & Milovanovic, D. (2007). Social justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, R. (1974). Three faces of cruelty: Towards a comparative sociology of violence. Theory and Society, 1(4), 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commissiong, A. B. (2012). Cosmopolitanism in modernity: Human dignity in a global age. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Craig, G. (2002). Poverty, social work, and social justice. British Journal of Social Work, 32(6), 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Maio, F. (2012). Health and social theory. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Dussel, E. (1985). Philosophy of liberation. New York: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  13. Dussel, E. (2008). Ethics and community. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  14. Dussel, E. (2013). Ethics of liberation: In the age of globalization and exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fals Borda, O. (1988). Knowledge and people’s power. New York: New Horizons.Google Scholar
  16. Fals Borda, O. (1996). Power/knowledge and emancipation. Systems Practice, 9(2), 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finn, J. L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Just practice. Peosta: Eddie Bowers.Google Scholar
  18. Fondacaro, M. R., & Weinberg, D. (2002). Concepts of social justice in community psychology: Toward a social ecological epistemology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Social justice. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  21. Gostin, L. O., & Powers, M. (2006). What does social justice require for the public’s health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Affairs, 25(4), 1053–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neo-liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Herzberg, F. (1973). Work and the nature of man. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar
  24. Holahan, C. J., & Wilcox, B. L. (1977). Ecological strategies in community psychology: A case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 5(4), 423–433.Google Scholar
  25. Ivey, A. E., & Collins, N. M. (2003). Social justice: A long-term challenge for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(3), 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacoby, R. (2005). Picture imperfect: Utopian thought for an anti-utopian age. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Laverick, G. (2005). Public health. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  29. Leiby, J. (1984). Charity organizations reconsidered. Social Service Review, 58(4), 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemert, C. (2006). The new individualism: The emotional costs of globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. List, J. M. (2011). Beyond charity-social justice in health care. Virtual Mentor, 13(8), 565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maffettone, S., & Rathore, A. S. (2012). Global justice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Marullo, S., & Edwards, B. (2000). From charity to justice: The potential of university-community collaboration for social change. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 895–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McTaggert, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, J. W., & Callaghan, K. A. (2009). Economic culture and service delivery. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 8(2), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nelson and Prilleltensky (eds.) (2005). Community psychology: In the pursuit of liberation and well-being. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  41. Nussbaum, M. (2004). Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Boyle, E. J. (1991). On justice and charity. Review of Social Economy, 49(4), 578–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Packenham, R. A. (1992). The dependency movement: Scholarship and politics in development studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Peperzak, A. T. (2013). Trust. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1979). Poor people’s movements. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  46. Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Polities change, oppression remains: On the psychology and politics of oppression. Political Psychology, 17(1), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prilleltensky, I. (2000). Bridging agency, theory, and action: Critical links in critical psychology. In T. Sloan (Ed.), Critical psychology: Voices for change (pp. 67–81). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Riger, S. (2001). Transforming community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  51. Serrano-Caldera, A. (1993). La Unidad y la Diversidad. Managua: Editorial San Rafael.Google Scholar
  52. Smart, B. (2003). Economy, culture, and society: A critique of neo-liberalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2008). Toward psychologies of liberation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wiesenfeld, E. (1996). The concept of ‘we’: A community social psychology myth? Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Žižek, S. (2012). The year of dreaming dangerously. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations