Skip to main content

Social Interventions and Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1392 Accesses

Abstract

An important aspect of the community-based philosophy is the issue of justice. This theme was first relevant during the 1960s, when communities were demanding to be treated with dignity. Both around the world and in the USA, demonstrations erupted against the war in Vietnam and many types of discrimination. More recently, however, the topic of justice arose within the context of globalization (Nussbaum, Oxford Development Studies 32(1):3–18, 2004). Many of the protests against this economic and cultural trend have had the retrieval of justice as their key principle. The charge of these movements is that globalization has created a situation where justice has little value. As a result of certain economic policies, the social world seems to be a very hostile and unequal place. For example, vital institutions appear to cater mostly to the rich, while the gap between this class and the rest, in most societies, is expanding (Smart, Economy, culture, and society: A critique of neo-liberalism, 2003). The basic organizations of society are beyond the control of most persons. And as mentioned in the introduction to this book, a credibility gap is prevalent that fosters cynicism and withdrawal. Many communities are caught in the midst of this process and are beginning to deteriorate. And similar to the 1960s, these groups are seeking dignity and some control over their lives (Piven and Cloward, Poor people’s movements, 1979). But a new wrinkle has appeared in this argument. The proponents of change contend that the usual response to this condition is insufficient. That is, the standard forms of charity are considered to be demeaning and ineffective, since this reaction is mostly personal and emotional, with few, if any, obligations. Indeed, charity represents acts of kindness that often require little more than expressions of concern about the condition of many unfortunate persons. In this regard, universal benevolence is deemed to be sufficient to solve the ills related, for example, to poverty or the absence of health care (Tronto, Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, E., & Brownson, C. A. (1998). Defining characteristics of community-based health promotion programs. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 4(2), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2005). Why social justice matters. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (1983). On the obsolescence of the concept of honour. In S. Hauerwas & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), Revisions: Changing perspectives in moral philosophy (pp. 172–181). Norte Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boff, L. (2001). Ética Planetaria desde el Sur. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1957). Pointing the way. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner-Schmidt, K., & Lobo, M. L. (2012). Social justice: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(4), 948–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capeheart, L., & Milovanovic, D. (2007). Social justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1974). Three faces of cruelty: Towards a comparative sociology of violence. Theory and Society, 1(4), 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissiong, A. B. (2012). Cosmopolitanism in modernity: Human dignity in a global age. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. (2002). Poverty, social work, and social justice. British Journal of Social Work, 32(6), 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Maio, F. (2012). Health and social theory. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (1985). Philosophy of liberation. New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (2008). Ethics and community. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (2013). Ethics of liberation: In the age of globalization and exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (1988). Knowledge and people’s power. New York: New Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (1996). Power/knowledge and emancipation. Systems Practice, 9(2), 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Just practice. Peosta: Eddie Bowers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondacaro, M. R., & Weinberg, D. (2002). Concepts of social justice in community psychology: Toward a social ecological epistemology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Social justice. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O., & Powers, M. (2006). What does social justice require for the public’s health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Affairs, 25(4), 1053–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neo-liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1973). Work and the nature of man. New York: The New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. J., & Wilcox, B. L. (1977). Ecological strategies in community psychology: A case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 5(4), 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, A. E., & Collins, N. M. (2003). Social justice: A long-term challenge for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(3), 290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (2005). Picture imperfect: Utopian thought for an anti-utopian age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverick, G. (2005). Public health. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiby, J. (1984). Charity organizations reconsidered. Social Service Review, 58(4), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, C. (2006). The new individualism: The emotional costs of globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. M. (2011). Beyond charity-social justice in health care. Virtual Mentor, 13(8), 565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffettone, S., & Rathore, A. S. (2012). Global justice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marullo, S., & Edwards, B. (2000). From charity to justice: The potential of university-community collaboration for social change. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 895–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggert, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. W., & Callaghan, K. A. (2009). Economic culture and service delivery. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 8(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson and Prilleltensky (eds.) (2005). Community psychology: In the pursuit of liberation and well-being. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2004). Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, E. J. (1991). On justice and charity. Review of Social Economy, 49(4), 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packenham, R. A. (1992). The dependency movement: Scholarship and politics in development studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak, A. T. (2013). Trust. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1979). Poor people’s movements. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Polities change, oppression remains: On the psychology and politics of oppression. Political Psychology, 17(1), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (2000). Bridging agency, theory, and action: Critical links in critical psychology. In T. Sloan (Ed.), Critical psychology: Voices for change (pp. 67–81). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (2001). Transforming community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Caldera, A. (1993). La Unidad y la Diversidad. Managua: Editorial San Rafael.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, B. (2003). Economy, culture, and society: A critique of neo-liberalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2008). Toward psychologies of liberation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld, E. (1996). The concept of ‘we’: A community social psychology myth? Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2012). The year of dreaming dangerously. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Murphy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, J. (2014). Social Interventions and Justice. In: Community-Based Interventions. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8020-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics