Advertisement

The Dimensions of a Community

Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

In Chap.  2, the point was emphasized that realism is passé in community-based planning. As a result, a community emerges from action and should not be identified with obtrusive, empirical traits. Although this claim is true, the process of conceptualizing and locating a community is complex. Human action is central but a host of issues is involved. Conceptualizing a community, for example, includes the recognition of others, criteria for inclusion, a knowledge base, and boundaries. These elements, accordingly, must be determined through participation, since a uniform reality is difficult to justify in the absence of realism (Campbell and Murray, Journal of Health Psychology, 9(2):187–195, 2004). In the end, a community emerges through joint action that establishes a foundation for further decisions, or constructions. This base, however, does not necessarily represent an all-encompassing reality, with exact and objective parameters. Through human intervention the appearance is created that a community is something substantial. In the absence of an obtrusive referent, a domain of inclusion is created and reinforced. Possibilities are narrowed and behavioral expectations outlined. Over time, simply put, certain values and commitments are accepted as normative, at least until additional interpretations are considered to be valid. In this sense, a particular rendition of Communitas is operative—that is, persons are bound together by commitments instead of external features (Esposito, Communitas, 2010, pp. 6–7). Most important is that any social reality, or construction, must be confirmed by the members of a community to have any legitimacy.

Keywords

Empiricism Social indicator analysis Community construction Paramount reality Social solidarity Multiculturalism Community entrée 

References

  1. Alperovitz, G. (2013). What then must we do? White River Junction: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  2. Astleithner, F., Hamedinger, A., Holman, N., & Ryden, Y. (2004). Institutions and indicators-the discourse about indicators in the context of sustainability. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 19(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, C., & Murray, M. (2004). Community health psychology: Promoting analysis and action for social change. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(2), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chavis, D. M., & Newbrough, J. R. (1986). The meaning of ‘community’ in social psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean, R. G., & Fenby, B. L. (1989). Exploring epistemologies: Social work action as a reflection of philosophical assumptions. Journal of Social Work Education, 25(1), 46–54.Google Scholar
  11. Dussel, E. (2008). Ethics and community. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
  12. Esposito, R. (2010). Communitas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.Google Scholar
  14. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology and Practice, 3(1), 6–25.Google Scholar
  15. Furman, G. C. (1998). Postmodernism and community in schools: Unraveling the paradox. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 298–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebser, J. (1985). The ever-present origin. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1970). Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13(1-4), 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holahan, C. J., & Wilcox, B. L. (1977). Ecological strategies in community psychology: A case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 5(4), 423–433.Google Scholar
  19. Houston, S. (2005). Philosophy, theory and method in social work: Challenging empiricism’s claim on evidence-based practice. Journal of Social Work, 5(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hughes, J., & Sharrock, W. (1990). The philosophy of social research. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, A., & Riger, S. (1986). The meaning of community in community mental health. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kazi, M. (2003). Realist evaluation for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 33(6), 803–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly, J. G. (1987). An ecological paradigm: Defining mental health consultation as a preventive service. Prevention in Human Services, 4(3-4), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuyek, J. N. (1990). Fighting for hope: Organizing to realize our dreams. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  25. Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mead, G. H. (1974). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcome. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Mittelart, A., & Mittelart, M. (1998). Theories of communication. Thousand Oakes: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Nelson, G., Prilleltensky, I., & MacGillivary, H. (2001). Building value-based partnerships: Toward solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 649–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Park, R. E. (1952). Human communities. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pollner, M. (1975). The very coinage of your brain: The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5(3), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ríos, M., Vásquez, L., & Miranda, L. (Eds.). (2012). Diálogos: Placemaking in Latino communities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Roy, S., & Sharma, B. B. L. (1986). Community participation in primary health care. Health and population, 9(4), 165–191.Google Scholar
  39. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schutz, A. (1962). Collected Papers (Vol. 1). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  41. Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers (Vol. 2). The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, D. (1989). Meaning construction and social work practice. Social service review, 63(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solomon, G. (1980). The rural human service delivery system: Entry issues. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 1(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  45. Stark, W. (1963). Fundamental forms of social thought. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, C. (1988). The moral topography of the self. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, & R. L. Woolfork (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory (pp. 298–320). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, C. (1989). The sources of the self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. van Ruler, B. (2004). The communication grid: An introductory model of four communication strategies. Public Relations Review, 30(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallerstein, N. (1992). Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: Implications for health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 6(3), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health. Health Education Quarterly, 21(3), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, S. (1997). Beyond retroduction?—Hermeneutics, reflexivity, and social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 27(5), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiesenfeld, E. (1996). The concept of ‘we’: A community social psychology myth. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Winch, P. (1990). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  54. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations