Abstract
Clinical trials systematically compare safety and efficacy of different therapeutic interventions. Since the 1960s proof of efficacy and safety through appropriate clinical trials are a legal requirement for the registration of drugs, and that made the advent of drug labels in the modern sense of the word. Regulatory clinical trials have become one cornerstone of the drug development process. Pivotal trials are decisive for registration: a drug may show promising results in early trials; if it fails in the pivotal trials, it is abandoned—or developed for another indication. In parallel to industry-sponsored clinical trials with regulatory purposes, academic trials continued. They aim at improving interventions without regulatory concerns. When modern labels were introduced, children were largely excluded from regulatory clinical trials. With increasing understanding of the child’s developing body and how it interacts with drugs, i.e., with the evolvement of pediatric clinical pharmacology, dosing based on mechanical formulas was understood to be insufficient. Pediatricians used the increasing number of available, highly effective, adult drugs off-label also in children, but a gap was perceived between the attention given to adults as compared to children. The child version of the British National Formulary (BNF) was a pragmatic attempt for reconciliation. Pediatric oncologists developed new off-label treatment schemes for adult anticancer drugs—also a pragmatic approach. Since 1997, US pediatric legislation encourages pharmaceutical companies to generate additional pediatric data. The 2006 EU pediatric legislation aims at investigating the potential pediatric use of new drugs already during early drug development and at their registration in children. In short, we have at least four developments: (1) a better understanding of the child’s developing body and how it impacts drug treatment; (2) the expansion of the framework and the science of human clinical trials into addressing child-specific aspects; (3) facilitation of generating additional pediatric data by US legislation; (4) EU’s wish to use pharmaceutical industry’s financial and research potential for the benefit of children. Both US and EU legislation request age-adapted pediatric formulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ICH Guidelines (1996) Good clinical practice E6. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf
Lind J (1772) A treatise on the scurvy, 3rd edn. S Crowder et al, London
Dunn PM (1997) James Lind (1716–94) of Edinburgh and the treatment of scurvy. Arch Dis Child 76:F64–F65
Bartholomew M (2002) James Lind’s treatise of the scurvy (1753). Postgrad Med J 78:695–696, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1742547/pdf/v078p00695.pdf
Beecher H (1966) Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 274(24):1354–1360
Weyers W (2003) The abuse of man. An illustrated history of dubious medical experimentation. Ardor Scribendi, New York, pp 161–235
Mozes-Kor E (1992) The Mengele twins and human experimentation. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Oxford University Press, New York
Weindling P (2001) The origins of informed consent: the International Scientific Commission on medical war crimes, and the Nuremberg Code. Bull Hist Med 75(1):37–71
Childress JF et al (eds) (2005) Belmont revisited. Georgetown University Press, Washington
WMA Declaration of Helsinki (2008) Original version 1964. In: Williams JR (ed) The declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bull World Health Organ 86(8):650–652. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/8/08-050955.pdf. WMA Declaration of Helsinki (2013) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.pdf
Hornblum AM (1998) Acres of skin. Routledge, New York
Meinert CL, Tonascia S (1986) Clinical trials: design, conduct, and analysis. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 978-0-19-503568-1
Hilts PJ (2003) Protecting America’s health. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. ISBN 0-375-40466-X
Wax P (1995) Elixirs, diluents, and the passage of the 1938 federal food, drug and cosmetic act. Ann Intern Med 122:456–461
Taussig HB (1962) A study of the German outbreak of phocomelia. JAMA 180:1106–1114
Meadows M (2006) Promoting safe and effective drugs for 100 years. FDA Consumer Magazine, The Centennial Edition/January–February 2006. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/History/ProductRegulation/PromotingSafeandEffectiveDrugsfor100Years/default.htm
Association of Clinical Research Organisations ACRO. http://www.acrohealth.org/
European CRO Federation. http://www.eucrof.eu/
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). www.ich.org
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). www.phrma.org
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). www.efpia.eu
Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA). www.mhlw.go.jp
International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA). www.ifpma.org
US Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov
European Medicines Agency. www.emea.europa.eu
Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. www.mhlw.go.jp
Colon AR (1999) Nurturing children: a history of pediatrics. Greenwood Pub Group, Westport, ISBN-10: 0313310807, ISBN-13: 978-0313310805
Shirkey H (1968) Therapeutic orphans. Pediatrics 72:119–120
Wilson JT (1999) An update on the therapeutic orphan. Pediatrics 104(Suppl 3):585–590, http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/104/3/S1/585
Orme M (2010) Clinical pharmacology in research, teaching and health care. Considerations by IUPHAR, the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 107:531–559. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00602.x/pdf
Seyberth HW, Rane A, Schwab M (eds) (2011) Pediatric clinical pharmacology, Handbook of experimental pharmacology 205. Springer, Berlin
Kearns GL et al (2003) Developmental pharmacology – drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med 349:1157–1167
Van Overmeire B et al (2000) A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent Ductus Arteriosus. N Engl J Med 343:674–681, http://www.neonatologie.ugent.be/ibu-indo.pdf
ICH Guideline (2000) Clinical investigation of medicinal products in the pediatric population E11. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E11/Step4/E11_Guideline.pdf
Rose K (2008) Ethical, regulatory and scientific challenges in paediatric drug development. Pharm Med 22(4):221–234
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA), Pub. L. No. 107–109, 115 Stat. 1408. http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/PL107-109.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2012
Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/UCM077853.pdf
FDA Fact Sheet: Pediatric Provisions in the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA). http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/SignificantAmendmentstotheFDCAct/FDASIA/ucm311038.htm
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:378:0001:0019:en:PDF
Fiebig D (2012) Preparing the Paediatric Investigation Plan application. Med Writing 21(2):108–113
Tomasi P (2012) Writing applications for Paediatric Investigation Plans and waivers. Med Writing 21(2):1–4
Rose K (2012) Challenges of paediatric drug development and impact of paediatric legislation. Med Writing 21(2):99–103
Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Hayem M (1997) Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute otitis media? A metaanalysis. BMJ 314:1526–1529
Sanders S, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB, Rovers MM (2004) Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(1). Art. No. CD000219. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000219.pub2
Cook DT (2004) The commodification of childhood: the children’s clothing industry and the rise of the child consumer. Duke University Press, Durham, ISBN-10: 082233268X, ISBN-13: 978-0822332688
Stiller CA, Kroll ME, Pritchard-Jones K (2012) Population survival from childhood cancer in Britain during 1978–2005 by eras of entry to clinical trials. Ann Oncol 23:2464–2469
Innovative Treatment for Children with Cancer (ITCC). European Consortium. www.itcc-consortium.org
Nelson RM (2009) Additional protections for children enrolled in clinical investigations. In: Mulberg AE, Silber S, Van Den Anker JN (eds) Pediatric drug development – concepts and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken. ISBN 978-0-470-16929-2
Neubauer D, Laitinen-Parkkonen P, Matthys D (2007) Ethical challenges of clinical research in children. In: Rose K, Van Den Anker J (eds) Guide to paediatric clinical research. Karger Publishers, Basel
Grodin MA, Glanth LH (eds) (1994) Children as research subjects. Oxford University Press, New York
Ross LF (2006) Children in medical research: access versus protection. Oxford University Press, New York
Westra A (2011) The moral limits of medical research with children. Off Page Publishers, Amsterdam. ISBN 978-94-90371-80-7
Lamprill J, Fowler PA (2007) Consent and assent in paediatric clinical trials. In: Rose K, Van Den Anker J (eds) Guide to paediatric clinical research. Karger Publishers, Basel
Hawcutt DB et al (2010) Points to consider when planning the collection of blood or tissue samples in clinical trials of investigational medicinal products in children, infants and neonates. In: Rose K, Van Den Anker JN (eds) Guide to paediatric drug development and clinical research. Karger Publishers, Basel
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rose, K. (2014). Clinical Testing in Children. In: Bar-Shalom, D., Rose, K. (eds) Pediatric Formulations. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8011-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8011-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-8010-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-8011-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)