Skip to main content

Abstract

This book deals with the problem of biological pattern formation. What are the mechanisms according to which individual organisms develop and biological patterns form? Biological organisms are characterized by their genomes. The letters of the genetic alphabet (the nucleotides), their precise arrangement in selected organisms (the gene sequence), and the molecular structure of a large number of encoded proteins are public today. However, analysis of single gene and protein function is not sufficient to explain complex pattern formation which results from collective behavior of interacting molecules and cells. In the beginning of embryological development , all cells are identical – equipped with basically the same set of genes. Accordingly, collective phenomena brought about by the interaction of cells with themselves and their surrounding are responsible for differentiation and pattern formation characterizing subsequent developmental stages. Mathematical modeling is strongly needed to discover the self-organization principles of interacting cell systems (Deutsch et al. 2003). Still, an open question is: what are appropriate mathematical models, how can they be analyzed, and which specific biological problems can they address? In this chapter, the motivation for the book is provided. The basic problems are introduced and the connection of biological pattern formation and mathematical modeling is emphasized. Finally, an outline introduces the book structure and specific suggestions on how to read the book depending on the reader’s background.

Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A. Einstein

  2. 2.

    So we clearly reject the following statement quoted from a review paper on the first edition of “Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation”: “…We do not believe that CA [cellular automata] should be viewed as a replacement for rigorous mathematical models. Instead, they should be considered as a first step in the modeling process. Once it has been established that the CA implementation of one’s hypothesis produces the desired results, then one must proceed toward deriving a traditional mathematical model. For then and only then is it possible to bring to bear tools from analysis such as stability theory, bifurcation theory, and perturbation methods …” (from Ermentrout and Edelstein-Keshet 1993).

Bibliography

  • Britton, N. F. 1986. Reaction-Diffusion Equations and their Applications to Biology. London: Academic.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. 1989. Alternate Realities. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. 2002. Science is a computer program. Nature 417: 381–382. book review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplain, M. A. J., G. D. Singh, and J. C. McLachlan, eds. 1999. On Growth and Form: Spatio-Temporal Pattern Formation in Biology. Chichester: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., M. Falcke, J. Howard, and W. Zimmermann, eds. 2003. Function and Regulation of Cellular Systems: Experiments and Models. Basel: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasdo, D. 2003. On selected individual-based approaches to the dynamics in multicellular systems. In Models of Polymer and Cell Dynamics, eds. W. Alt, M. Chaplain, M. Griebel, and J. Lenz. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout, G. B., and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 1993. Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. Journal of Theoretical Biology 160: 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, U., B. Hasslacher, and Y. Pomeau. 1986. Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equation. Physical Review Letters 56(14): 1505–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gierer, A., and H. Meinhardt. 1972. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12: 30–39.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsoeker N. 1694. Essay de dioptrique. Paris, J. Anisson

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann, R., and A. Flache. 1998. Understanding complex social dynamics: a plea for cellular automata based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(3): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtfreter, J. 1939. Gewebaffinität, ein Mittel der embryonalen Formbildung. Archiv für Experimentelle Zellforschung 23: 169–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtfreter, J. 1944. A study of the mechanics of gastrulation, part II. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 95: 171–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadanoff, L. P. 1986. On two levels. Physics Today Sept.: 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maini, P. K. 1999. Mathematical models in morphogenesis. In Mathematics Inspired by Biology. eds. V. Capasso and O. Dieckmann, 151–189. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. 1992. Pattern formation in biology: a comparison of models and experiments. Reports on Progress in Physics 55: 797–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. 2002. Is the universe a universal computer? Science 298: 65–68. book review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. D. 2002. Mathematical Biology, 3rd ed. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Othmer, H. G., P. K. Maini, and J. D. Murray, eds. 1993. Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Biological Pattern Formation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueff, J. 1554. De conceptu et generatione hominis, et iis quae circa hec potissimum consysderantur, libri sex. Zurich: Christopher Froschauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, M. S. 1963. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141(3579): 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Townes, P. L., and J. Holtfreter. 1955. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 128: 53–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 237: 37–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Liedekerke, P., M. M. Palm, N. Jagiella, and D. Drasdo. 2015. Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: concepts, perspectives and some novel results. Computational Particle Mechanics 2: 401–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. 1966. Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, ed. A. W. Burks. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. 1953a. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171: 964–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. 1953b. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for desoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171: 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. 1985. Twenty problems in the theory of cellular automata. Physica Scripta T9: 170–183. Proceedings of the fifty-ninth Nobel Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. 2002. A New Kind of Science. Champaign: Wolfram Media, Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Deutsch, A., Dormann, S. (2017). Introduction and Outline. In: Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7980-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics