Skip to main content

Multi-period Efficiency Measurement with Fuzzy Data and Weight Restrictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Operations Analytics Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 239))

Abstract

In measuring the overall efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs) in a time span covering multiple periods, the conventional approach is to use the aggregate data of the multiple periods via a data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique, ignoring the specific situation of each period. In the real word, there are situations that the observations are inexact and imprecise in nature and they have to be estimated. This study proposes using a relational network model to take the operations of individual periods into account in measuring efficiencies, and the input and output data are treated as fuzzy numbers. Moreover, the assurance region approach is utilized in the model to reduce the weight flexibility for the prevention of overly optimistic, even unrealistic, measures of efficiency. The overall and period efficiencies of a DMU can be calculated at the same time, and since the observations are fuzzy, the derived overall and period efficiencies are fuzzy as well. A pair of two-level mathematical programs is developed to calculate the lower and upper bounds of the α-cut of the fuzzy efficiencies. It is shown that the fuzzy overall efficiency is still a weighted average of the fuzzy period efficiencies. Fuzzy measures obtained from fuzzy observations are more informative than crisp measures obtained from fuzzy observations to be precise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., Reese, D. N., & Tam, F. (2007). Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, H., Örckü, H. H., & Çelebioğlu, S. (2008). A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17B, 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). The non-Archimedean CCR ratio for efficiency analysis: A rejoinder to Boyd and Färe. European Journal of Operational Research, 15, 333–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., & Sun, D. B. (1990). Polyhedral cone-ratio models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on.European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G. B. (1963). Linear programming and extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & Tavana, M. (2014). Performance measurement with fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, P. J. (2009). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis and its application to location problems. Information Sciences, 179, 820–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, P., Tanaka, H., & Inuiguchi, M. (2000). Self-organizing fuzzy aggregation models to rank the objects with multiple attributes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, 30, 573–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Tavana, M. (2011). A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making. European Journal of Operational Research, 214, 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1107–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Lin, P. H. (2012). Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 198, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2000a). Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113, 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2000b). Data envelopment analysis with missing data: An application to university libraries in Taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2004). Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: A case of Taiwan commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 2353–2368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2011). Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 176, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2014). Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega, 47, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. J., Soleimani-damaneh, M., & Wallenius, J. (2011). Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lertworasirkul, S., Fang, S. C., Joines, J. A., & Nuttle, H. L. W. (2003). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): A possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 139, 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. T. (2008). A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. T. (2014). Restricting weight flexibility in fuzzy two-stage DEA. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 18, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2014a). Computing fuzzy process efficiency in parallel systems. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 13, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2014b). Process efficiency of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 243, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T. (1978). A note on the extension principle for fuzzy sets. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 64, 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramόn, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2010). A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saati, S., & Memariani, A. (2005). Reducing weight flexibility in fuzzy DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 161, 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokouhi, A. H., Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., & Satti, S. (2010). A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C. T., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Thrall, R. M., & Smith, B. A. (1986). Comparative site evaluations for locating high energy lab in Texas. Interfaces, 16, 1380–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. Z. (1996). Fuzzy set theory and its applications (3rd ed.). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan), under grant MOST 103-2410-H-238-005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiang-Tai Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, ST. (2016). Multi-period Efficiency Measurement with Fuzzy Data and Weight Restrictions. In: Hwang, SN., Lee, HS., Zhu, J. (eds) Handbook of Operations Analytics Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 239. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7705-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics