Abstract
The last decade has fundamentally changed the face of retailing. The genesis has been increased customer fragmentation, enabling technologies such as the internet and increased competition. In this era of “hypercompetition,” retailers need to have a better understanding of the performance of individual stores so they can more accurately plan their merchandise assortments and set more realistic merchandising goals. In this paper, we determine the performance of retail outlets relative to the “best practice” set of outlets and demonstrate the importance of accommodating both regional and assortment differences. We empirically assess the performance of stores from a major Fortune 500 multinational retailing chain. Multiple inputs and outputs from 59 stores in three regions were used to determine sales goals for two different product categories. The results of three alternative models suggest that incorporating both assortment and regional differences significantly affects both performance and predicted sales volume estimates. Implications and avenues for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Virtual stores is a term used in DEA analysis and does not refer to an Internet-based store.
References
Achabal DD, Heineke JM, McIntyre SH (1984) Issues and perspectives on retail productivity. J Retail 60:107–127
Banker RD, Morley RC (1986a) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res 4:513–521
Banker RD, Morley RC (1986b) The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 32:1613–1627
Bessen J (1993) Riding the marketing information wave. Harv Busi Rev. September–October:150–163
Blattberg RC, Deighton J (1991) Interactive marketing: exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Manage Rev 33:5–17
Boles J, Donthu N, Lohtia R (1995) Salesperson evaluation using relative performance efficiency: the application of data envelopment analysis. J Pers Sell Sales Manage 15:31–49
Bucklin LP (1978) Productivity in marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago
Chebat J-C, Filiatrault P, Katz A, Tal SM (1994) Strategic auditing of human and financial resource allocation in marketing: an empirical study using data envelopment analysis. J Bus Res 31:197–208
Donthu N, Yoo B (1998) Retail productivity assessment using data envelopment analysis. J Retail 74:74–92
Gilmore J, Joseph Pine B (1997) The four faces of mass customization. Harv Bus Rev 75:91–101
Ingene CA (1982) Labor productivity in retailing. J Mark 46:75–90
Ingene CA (1984) Productivity and functional shifting in spatial retailing: private and social perspectives. J Retail 60:15–36
Kahn B (1991) Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. J Retail Cons Serv 2(3):139–148
Kahn B, Lehmann DR (1991) Modeling choice among assortments. J Retail 67(3):274–299
Kahn B, McAlister L (1997) Grocery revolution. Addison Wesley, Boston
Kamakura WA, Ratchford BT, Agrawal J (1988) Measuring market efficiency and welfare loss. J Cons Res 15:289–302
Kamakura WA, Lenartowicz T, Ratchford BT (1996) Productivity assessment of multiple retail outlets. J Retail 74:333–352
Klein G (1998) Sources of power. MIT, Cambridge
Lusch RF, Jaworski BJ (1991) Management controls, role stress and retail store manager performance. J Retail 67:397–419
Lusch RF, Serpkenci RR (1990) Personal differences, job tension, job outcomes, and store performance: a study of retail store managers. J Mark 54:85–101
Mahajan J (1991) A data envelopment analytic model for assessing the relative efficiency of the selling function. Eur J Oper Res 53:189–205
Murthi BPS, Srinivasan K, Kalyanaram G (1996) Controlling for observed and unobserved managerial skills in determining first-mover market share advantages. J Mark Res 23:329–336
Parsons LJ (1990) Assessing salesforce performance with data envelopment analysis. Paper presented at TIMS marketing science conference. University of Illinois, Urbana
Ratchford BT, Brown JR (1985) Study of productivity changes in food retailing. Mark Sci 4:292–311
Ratchford BT, Stoops GT (1988) A model and measurement approach for studying retail productivity. J Retail 64:241–263
Solomon B (1994). Mass chains turning stocks store by store. Women’s Wear Daily (June, 8): 1, 17
Yadav M, Monroe KB (1993) How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: an examination of a Bundle’s transactional value. J Mark Res 30:350–358
Zimmerman KA (1998) Kmart to quadruple size of data warehouse. Supermarket News 48(28):19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grewal, D., Levy, M., Mehrotra, A., Sharma, A. (2016). Planning Merchandising Decisions to Account for Regional and Product Assortment Differences. In: Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 238. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7682-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7684-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)