Abstract
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has traditionally been used to measure the performance of production systems in terms of efficiency in converting inputs into outputs. In this paper, we present a novel use of the two-stage network DEA to evaluate the sustainable product design performances. While sustainable product design has been considered as one of the most important practices for achieving sustainability, one challenge faced by decision makers in both the private and public sectors is how to deal with the difficult technical trade-offs between traditional and environmental attributes which require new design concepts and engineering specifications. To deal with this challenge, we conceptualize “design efficiency” as a key measurement of design performance in terms of how well multiple product specifications and attributes are combined in a product design that leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. A two-stage network DEA model is developed for sustainable design performance evaluation with an “industrial design module” and a “bio design module.” To demonstrate the applications of our DEA-based methodology, we use data of key engineering specifications, product attributes, and emissions performances in the vehicle emissions testing database published by the U.S. EPA to evaluate the sustainable design performances of different automobile manufacturers. Our test results show that sustainable design does not need to mean compromise between traditional and environmental attributes. Through addressing the interrelatedness of subsystems in product design, a firm can find the most efficient way to combine product specifications and attributes which leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. We also demonstrate how two-stage network DEA can be used to develop a analytical framework for evaluating sustainable design performances as well as to identify the most eco-efficient way to achieve better environmental performances through product design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atasu A, Souza GC (2010) How does product recovery affect quality choice? Working Paper. George Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Atasu A, Ozdemir O, Van Wassenhove LN (2008) Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Manag Sci 54(10):1731–1747
Calcott P, Walls M (2000) Can downstream waste disposal policies encourage upstream design for environment? Am Econ Rev 90(2):233–237
Cariaga I, El-Diraby T, Osman H (2007) Integrating value analysis and quality function deployment. J Constr Eng Manag 133(10):761–770
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag Sci 47(2):250–263
Chen C, Zhang J (2009) The inconvenient truth about improving vehicle fuel efficiency: A multi-attributes analysis of the technology efficient frontier of the US automobile industry. Transport Res D 14(1):22–31
Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, Zhu J (2009) Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur J Oper Res 196:1170–1176
Chiou YC, Lan LW, Yen TH (2010) A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. Eur J Oper Res 201(2):477–489
CNTV (2010) New car emission standard imposed. CNTV (June 12)
Conway-Schempf N, Lave LB (1999) Green design tools for environmental management. Environ Qual Manag 8(4):35–46
Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2010) Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. OMEGA 38:423–430
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Crandall RW, Graham JD (1989) The effect of fuel economy standards on automobile safety. J Law Econ 32(1):97–118
Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer, New York
Design News (2008) The fuel-efficient automotive transmissions of tomorrow. Design News 63(9) (Jun 23)
Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259
Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2010) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci 42(3):151–157
U.S. EPA (2009) Certification emission test data. Available at www.epa.gov
U.S. EPA (2010) EPA and NHTSA finalize historic national program to reduce greenhouse gases and improve fuel economy for cars and trucks. EPA-420-F-10-014 (April 2010)
European Federation for Transport and Environment (2008) Weight-based standards make CO2 targets harder to reach. Background Briefing (April 2008)
Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Econ Lett 50:65–70
Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci 34:35–49
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of production efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–81
Farris JA, Groesbeck RL, Van Aken EM, Letens G (2006) Evaluating the relative performance of engineering design projects: a case study using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53(3):472–482
Fiksel J (2009) Design for environment: A guide to sustainable product development. McGraw-Hill
Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, van der Laan E, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17
Fullerton D, Wu W (1998) Policies for green design. J Environ Econ Manag 36:131–148
Graedel TEH, Allenby BR (2009) Industrial ecology and sustainable engineering. Prentice Hall
Green Brand Survey, 2012. WPP Companies Cohn & Wolfe, Landor Associates, and Penn Schoen Berland
Handfield RB, Melnyk SA, Calantone RJ, Curkovic S (2001) Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(2):189–208
Hauser JT, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73
Hendrickson CT, Lave LB, Matthews HS (2006) environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input-output approach. RFF, Washington, DC
Hopkins MS (2010) How sustainability fuels design innovation. Sloan Manage Rev 52(1):75–81
Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):418–429
Lauridsen EH, Jørgensen U (2010) Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy. Res Policy 39(4):486–494
Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008a) DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Logist 55:643–653
Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008b) The DEA game cross efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Oper Res 56:1278–1288
Lin C-Y, Kremer GEO (2010) DEA applications in the product design domain. VDM, Saarbrücken
Linton JD (2002) DEA: a method for ranking the greenness of design decisions. J Mech Des 124:145–150
Malloy RA (1996) Designing with recyclate. Plastics World 54:27–28
Miyashita T (2000) A study on the collaborative design using supervisor system. Trans Jpn Soci Mech Eng 66(643):921–928
Noori H (1990) Managing the dynamics of new technology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Noori H, Chen C (2003) Applying scenario-driven strategy to integrate environmental management and product design. Prod Oper Manag 12(3):353–368
Shephard RW, Färe R (1979) Dynamic theory of production correspondences. Anton Hain, Meisenheim
Thompson RG, Langemeier LN, Lee CT, Lee E, Thrall RM (1990) The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J Econ 46:93–108
Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2012) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York
Urban GL, Hauser JR (1993) Design and marketing of new products. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Verhoef EV, Dijkema GPJ, Reuter MA (2004) Process knowledge, system dynamics, and metal ecology. J Ind Ecol 8(1-2):23–43
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, JY., Noori, H. (2016). Sustainable Product Design Performance Evaluation with Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 238. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7682-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7684-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)