Skip to main content

Sustainable Product Design Performance Evaluation with Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 238))

  • 2666 Accesses

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has traditionally been used to measure the performance of production systems in terms of efficiency in converting inputs into outputs. In this paper, we present a novel use of the two-stage network DEA to evaluate the sustainable product design performances. While sustainable product design has been considered as one of the most important practices for achieving sustainability, one challenge faced by decision makers in both the private and public sectors is how to deal with the difficult technical trade-offs between traditional and environmental attributes which require new design concepts and engineering specifications. To deal with this challenge, we conceptualize “design efficiency” as a key measurement of design performance in terms of how well multiple product specifications and attributes are combined in a product design that leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. A two-stage network DEA model is developed for sustainable design performance evaluation with an “industrial design module” and a “bio design module.” To demonstrate the applications of our DEA-based methodology, we use data of key engineering specifications, product attributes, and emissions performances in the vehicle emissions testing database published by the U.S. EPA to evaluate the sustainable design performances of different automobile manufacturers. Our test results show that sustainable design does not need to mean compromise between traditional and environmental attributes. Through addressing the interrelatedness of subsystems in product design, a firm can find the most efficient way to combine product specifications and attributes which leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. We also demonstrate how two-stage network DEA can be used to develop a analytical framework for evaluating sustainable design performances as well as to identify the most eco-efficient way to achieve better environmental performances through product design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atasu A, Souza GC (2010) How does product recovery affect quality choice? Working Paper. George Institute of Technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Atasu A, Ozdemir O, Van Wassenhove LN (2008) Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Manag Sci 54(10):1731–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcott P, Walls M (2000) Can downstream waste disposal policies encourage upstream design for environment? Am Econ Rev 90(2):233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariaga I, El-Diraby T, Osman H (2007) Integrating value analysis and quality function deployment. J Constr Eng Manag 133(10):761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag Sci 47(2):250–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Zhang J (2009) The inconvenient truth about improving vehicle fuel efficiency: A multi-attributes analysis of the technology efficient frontier of the US automobile industry. Transport Res D 14(1):22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, Zhu J (2009) Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur J Oper Res 196:1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou YC, Lan LW, Yen TH (2010) A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. Eur J Oper Res 201(2):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNTV (2010) New car emission standard imposed. CNTV (June 12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway-Schempf N, Lave LB (1999) Green design tools for environmental management. Environ Qual Manag 8(4):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2010) Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. OMEGA 38:423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall RW, Graham JD (1989) The effect of fuel economy standards on automobile safety. J Law Econ 32(1):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Design News (2008) The fuel-efficient automotive transmissions of tomorrow. Design News 63(9) (Jun 23)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2010) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci 42(3):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2009) Certification emission test data. Available at www.epa.gov

  • U.S. EPA (2010) EPA and NHTSA finalize historic national program to reduce greenhouse gases and improve fuel economy for cars and trucks. EPA-420-F-10-014 (April 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Federation for Transport and Environment (2008) Weight-based standards make CO2 targets harder to reach. Background Briefing (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Econ Lett 50:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci 34:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of production efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris JA, Groesbeck RL, Van Aken EM, Letens G (2006) Evaluating the relative performance of engineering design projects: a case study using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53(3):472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel J (2009) Design for environment: A guide to sustainable product development. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, van der Laan E, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton D, Wu W (1998) Policies for green design. J Environ Econ Manag 36:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TEH, Allenby BR (2009) Industrial ecology and sustainable engineering. Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Brand Survey, 2012. WPP Companies Cohn & Wolfe, Landor Associates, and Penn Schoen Berland

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield RB, Melnyk SA, Calantone RJ, Curkovic S (2001) Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(2):189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser JT, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson CT, Lave LB, Matthews HS (2006) environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input-output approach. RFF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins MS (2010) How sustainability fuels design innovation. Sloan Manage Rev 52(1):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauridsen EH, Jørgensen U (2010) Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy. Res Policy 39(4):486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008a) DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Logist 55:643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008b) The DEA game cross efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Oper Res 56:1278–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-Y, Kremer GEO (2010) DEA applications in the product design domain. VDM, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton JD (2002) DEA: a method for ranking the greenness of design decisions. J Mech Des 124:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy RA (1996) Designing with recyclate. Plastics World 54:27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita T (2000) A study on the collaborative design using supervisor system. Trans Jpn Soci Mech Eng 66(643):921–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori H (1990) Managing the dynamics of new technology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Noori H, Chen C (2003) Applying scenario-driven strategy to integrate environmental management and product design. Prod Oper Manag 12(3):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW, Färe R (1979) Dynamic theory of production correspondences. Anton Hain, Meisenheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RG, Langemeier LN, Lee CT, Lee E, Thrall RM (1990) The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J Econ 46:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2012) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban GL, Hauser JR (1993) Design and marketing of new products. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef EV, Dijkema GPJ, Reuter MA (2004) Process knowledge, system dynamics, and metal ecology. J Ind Ecol 8(1-2):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chialin Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, JY., Noori, H. (2016). Sustainable Product Design Performance Evaluation with Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 238. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics