Skip to main content

Use of nNIV in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Modes, Flexes, and More

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nocturnal Non-Invasive Ventilation
  • 735 Accesses

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common breathing disorder during sleep, characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction resulting in physiologic perturbations and frequent nocturnal arousals. Nocturnal noninvasive ventilatory (nNIV) techniques utilizing positive airway pressure (PAP) devices delivered through a comfortable mask interface have provided effective and acceptable treatment for this disorder. Despite excellent clinical outcomes with PAP, lack of adherence remains a major issue in clinical sleep medicine. Innovations in the delivery of PAP have attempted to address a major cause of noncompliance—patient discomfort with PAP. In the following review, new delivery modes of PAP in patients with OSA is presented along with relevant data regarding their efficacy in altering patient adherence patterns and clinical outcomes. The methods of PAP delivery to be discussed include continuous PAP (CPAP), bi-level PAP (BPAP), autotitrating PAP (APAP), pressure relief (PR), and auto-bi-level PAP (Auto-BPAP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guilleminault C, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and tracheostomy. Long-term follow-up experience. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:985–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet. 1981;1:862–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rapoport DM, Sorkin B, Garay SM, Goldring RM. Reversal of the “Pickwickian syndrome” by long-term use of nocturnal nasal-airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:931–3. doi:10.1056/NEJM198210073071507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner DR, Pollak CP, Weitzman ED. Nocturnal nasal-airway pressure for sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:461–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giles TL, et al. Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD001106, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001106.pub3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kushida CA, et al. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep. 2006;29:375–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Basner RC. Continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1751–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMct066953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5:173–8. doi:10.1513/pats.200708-119MG.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders MH, Kern N. Obstructive sleep apnea treated by independently adjusted inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressures via nasal mask. Physiologic and clinical implications. Chest. 1990;98:317–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeves-Hoche MK, et al. Continuous versus bilevel positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:443–9. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gay PC, Herold DL, Olson EJ. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing continuous positive airway pressure with a novel bilevel pressure system for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2003;26:864–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ballard RD, Gay PC, Strollo PJ. Interventions to improve compliance in sleep apnea patients previously non-compliant with continuous positive airway pressure. J Clin Sleep Med: JCSM. 2007;3:706–12.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Condos R, et al. Flow limitation as a noninvasive assessment of residual upper-airway resistance during continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:475–80. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois AB, Brody AW, Lewis DH, Burgess BF Jr. Oscillation mechanics of lungs and chest in man. J Appl Physiol. 1956;8:587–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farre R, Montserrat JM, Navajas D. Assessment of upper airway mechanics during sleep. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008;163:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2008.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meurice JC, Marc I, Series F. Efficacy of auto-CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:794–8. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boudewyns A, et al. Two months follow up of auto-CPAP treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax. 1999;54:147–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith I, Lasserson TJ. Pressure modification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD003531, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003531.pub3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galetke W, Anduleit N, Richter K, Stieglitz S, Randerath WJ. Comparison of automatic and continuous positive airway pressure in a night-by-night analysis: a randomized, crossover study. Respiration. 2008;75:163–9. doi:10.1159/000097767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hussain SF, Love L, Burt H, Fleetham JA. A randomized trial of auto-titrating CPAP and fixed CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea. Respir Med. 2004;98:330–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nussbaumer Y, Bloch KE, Genser T, Thurnheer R. Equivalence of autoadjusted and constant continuous positive airway pressure in home treatment of sleep apnea. Chest. 2006;129:638–43. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Randerath WJ, Galetke W, Ruhle KH. Auto-adjusting CPAP based on impedance versus bilevel pressure in difficult-to-treat sleep apnea syndrome: a prospective randomized crossover study. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9:CR353–C358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teschler H, Wessendorf TE, Farhat AA, Konietzko N, Berthon-Jones M. Two months auto-adjusting versus conventional nCPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:990–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. d’Ortho MP, et al. Constant vs. automatic continuous positive airway pressure therapy: home evaluation. Chest. 2000;118:1010–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hudgel DW, Fung C. A long-term randomized, cross-over comparison of auto-titrating and standard nasal continuous airway pressure. Sleep. 2000;23:645–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hukins C. Comparative study of autotitrating and fixed-pressure CPAP in the home: a randomized, single-blind crossover trial. Sleep. 2004;27:1512–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Noseda A, et al. Constant vs auto-continuous positive airway pressure in patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and a high variability in pressure requirement. Chest. 2004;126:31–7. doi:10.1378/chest.126.1.31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pevernagie DA, et al. Efficacy of flow- vs impedance-guided autoadjustable continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized cross-over trial. Chest. 2004;126:25–30. doi:10.1378/chest.126.1.25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hertegonne KB, Rombaut B, Houtmeyers P, Van Maele G, Pevernagie DA. Titration efficacy of two auto-adjustable continuous positive airway pressure devices using different flow limitation-based algorithms. Respiration. 2008;75:48–54. doi:10.1159/000103515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCoy R, Diesem R. 1–15 (ResMed) ResMed white paper, A Bench Comparison of Three Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure Devices: Response to Apnea, Hypopnea, Flow Limitation and Simulated Snore Robert McCoy BS RRT FAARCRyan Diesem BAValley Inspired Products Inc. 18 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kushida CA, et al. Positive airway pressure initiation: a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of therapy mode and titration process on efficacy, adherence, and outcomes. Sleep. 2011;34:1083–92. doi:10.5665/SLEEP.1166.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mulgrew AT, Cheema R, Fleetham J, Ryan CF, Ayas NT. Efficacy and patient satisfaction with autoadjusting CPAP with variable expiratory pressure vs standard CPAP: a two-night randomized crossover trial. Sleep Breath = Schlaf & Atmung. 2007;11:31–7, doi:10.1007/s11325-006-0078-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. ResMed (personal communication, ResMed technical support staff).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Respironics. http://flexfamily.respironics.com/.

  35. Bakker JP, Marshall NS. Flexible pressure delivery modification of continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea does not improve compliance with therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2011;139:1322–30. doi:10.1378/chest.10-2379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bakker J, Campbell A, Neill A. Randomized controlled trial comparing flexible and continuous positive airway pressure delivery: effects on compliance, objective and subjective sleepiness and vigilance. Sleep. 2010;33:523–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dolan DC, et al. Longitudinal comparison study of pressure relief (C-Flex) vs. CPAP in OSA patients. Sleep Breath = Schlaf & Atmung. 2009;13:73–7, doi:10.1007/s11325-008-0199-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Leidag M, Hader C, Keller T, Meyer Y, Rasche K. Mask leakage in continuous positive airway pressure and C-Flex. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59(Suppl 6):401–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marshall NS, Neill AM, Campbell AJ. Randomised trial of compliance with flexible (C-Flex) and standard continuous positive airway pressure for severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath = Schlaf & Atmung. 2008;12:393–6, doi:10.1007/s11325-008-0189-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nilius G, Happel A, Domanski U, Ruhle KH. Pressure-relief continuous positive airway pressure vs constant continuous positive airway pressure: a comparison of efficacy and compliance. Chest. 2006;130:1018–24. doi:10.1378/chest.130.4.1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pepin JL, et al. Pressure reduction during exhalation in sleep apnea patients treated by continuous positive airway pressure. Chest. 2009;136:490–7. doi:10.1378/chest.08-2646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aloia MS, Stanchina M, Arnedt JT, Malhotra A, Millman RP. Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Chest. 2005;127:2085–93. doi:10.1378/chest.127.6.2085.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. ResMed (personal communication, ResMed technical support staff).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rush, K (personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Blau A, et al. Auto bi-level pressure relief-PAP is as effective as CPAP in OSA patients—a pilot study. Sleep Breath = Schlaf & Atmung. 2012;16;773–9, doi:10.1007/s11325-011-0574-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gentina T, et al. Auto bi-level with pressure relief during exhalation as a rescue therapy for optimally treated obstructive sleep apnoea patients with poor compliance to continuous positive airways pressure therapy–a pilot study. Sleep Breath = Schlaf Atmung. 2011;15:21–7. doi:10.1007/s11325-009-0322-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ball N, Gordon N, Casal E, Parish J. Evaluation of auto bi-level algorithm to treat pressure intolerance in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath = Schlaf & Atmung. 2011;15:301–9, doi:10.1007/s11325-010-0381-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Powell ED, Gay PC, Ojile JM, Litinski M, Malhotra A. A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. J Clin Sleep Med: JCSM. 2012;8:43–7, doi:10.5664/jcsm.1658.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy A. Weingarten MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weingarten, J. (2015). Use of nNIV in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Modes, Flexes, and More. In: Basner, R., Parthasarathy, S. (eds) Nocturnal Non-Invasive Ventilation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7624-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7624-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7624-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics