Abstract
This chapter reviews the imaging techniques used in the evaluation of spondylolisthesis. Available modalities include radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, and scintigraphy. Optimal utilization of these techniques can result in an accurate assessment with little or no risk to the patient. The strengths of each modality will be discussed along with the limitations so that the reader can gain a sense of how to proceed with the diagnostic workup. The diagnosis of spondylolisthesis is usually first made on radiography which may or may not be performed with the specific diagnosis in mind. The severity of disease can be established and stability can be assessed. MRI is usually the next step if more information is needed regarding spinal canal or neural foraminal compromise. Computed tomography yields superior visualization of bone detail, particularly useful in the diagnosis of spondylolysis. Scintigraphy depicts metabolic changes in areas of bone turnover. Examples of findings in each modality in cases of spondylolisthesis will be provided, along with a discussion of the differences in imaging findings in spondylolisthesis according to the etiology of disease.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- AP:
-
Anteroposterior
- CAT:
-
Computed axial tomography
- CBCT:
-
Cone beam computed tomography
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- EM:
-
Electromagnetic
- H E :
-
Effective dose
- ICRP:
-
International Commission on Radiological Protection
- kVp:
-
Peak kilovoltage
- LSA:
-
Lumbosacral angle
- mA:
-
Milliampere
- mAs:
-
Milliamperes × seconds
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- mSv:
-
Millisievert
- PA:
-
Posteroanterior
- PD:
-
Proton-density
- PET:
-
Positron-emission tomography
- PI:
-
Pelvic index
- SI:
-
Sacral inclination
- SPECT:
-
Single-photon emission computed to-mography
- STIR:
-
Short-tau inversion recovery
- T1W:
-
T1-weighted
- T2W:
-
T2-weighted
- UV:
-
Ultraviolet
References
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®-low back pain radiographs; 2013. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/LowBackPain.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2013.
Iguchi T, Wakami T, Kurihara A, Kasahara K, Yoshiya S, Nishida K. Lumbar multilevel degenerative spondylolisthesis: radiological evaluation and factors related to anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;5(2):93–9.
Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932;54:371–7.
Taillard W. Le spondylolisthesis chez l’enfant et l’adolescent. Acta Orthop Scand. 1954;24(1–40):115–44.
Timon SJ, Gardner MJ, Wanich T, Poynton A, Pigeon R, Widmann RF, Rawlins BA, Burke SW. Not all spondylolisthesis grading instruments are reliable. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:157–62.
Vialle R, Schmit P, Dauzac C, Wicart P, Glorion C, Guigui P. Radiological assessment of lumbosacral dystrophic changes in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(9):528–35.
Butler D, Trafimow JH, Andersson GBJ, McNeill TW, Huckman MS. Discs degenerate before facets. Spine. 1990;15(2):111–3.
Herkowitz HN. Spine update: degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1995;20(9):1084–90.
Fisk JR, Moe JH, Winter RB. Scoliosis, spondylolysis, and spondylolisthesis. Their relationship as reviewed in 539 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978;3(3):234–45.
Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D, Kaneyama R, Otsuka M. Anatomic changes in lateral spondylolisthesis associated with adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(22):E671–5.
Talangbayan LE. The inverted Napoleon’s hat sign. Radiology. 2007;243(2):603–4.
Ravichandran G. A radiologic sign in spondylolisthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134(1):113–7.
Maldague BE, Malghem JJ. Unilateral arch hypertrophy with spinous process tilt: a sign of arch deficiency. Radiology. 1976;121(3 Pt. 1):567–74.
Schwab FJ, Farcy JP, Roye Jr DP. The sagittal pelvic tilt index as a criterion in the evaluation of spondylolisthesis. Preliminary observations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(14):1661–7.
Dubousset J. Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:77–85.
Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW. Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(18):2021–5.
Kälebo P, Kadziolka R, Swärd L, Zachrisson BE. Stress views in the comparative assessment of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;17(8):570–5.
Putto E, Tallroth K. Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine. A comparison of two methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(2):107–10.
Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007;245(1):62–77.
Maus T. Imaging of the spine and nerve roots. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002;13:487–544.
Nicolaou S, Liang T, Murphy DT, Korzan JR, Ouellette H, Munk P. Dual-energy CT: a promising new technique for assessment of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5 Suppl):S78–86.
Zukotynski K, Curtis C, Grant FD, Micheli L, Treves ST. The value of SPECT in the detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis in patients with low back pain. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:13.
Lim R, Fahey FH, Drubach LA, Connolly LP, Treves ST. Early experience with fluorine-18 sodium fluoride bone PET in young patients with back pain. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(3):277–82. PMID: 17414009.
Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:23–9.
Roche MB, Rowe GG. The incidence of separate neural arch and coincident bone variations; a survey of 4,200 skeletons. Anat Rec. 1951;109(2):233–52.
Paajanen H, Tertti M. Association of incipient disc degeneration and instability in spondylolisthesis. A magnetic resonance and flexion-extension radiographic study of 20-year-old low back pain patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;111(1):16–9.
Rossi F, Dragoni S. The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in symptomatic elite athletes: radiographic findings. Radiography. 2001;7(1):37–42.
Amato M, Totty WG, Gilula LA. Spondylolysis of the lumbar spine: demonstration of defects and laminal fragmentation. Radiology. 1984;153(3):627–9.
Libson E, Bloom RA, Dinari G. Symptomatic and asymptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in young adults. Int Orthop. 1982;6(4):259–61.
Ulmer JL, Elster AD, Mathews VP, King JC. Distinction between degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis on sagittal MR images: importance of increased anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal (“wide canal sign”). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(2):411–6.
Hollenberg GM, Beattie PF, Meyers SP, Weinberg EP, Adams MJ. Stress reactions of the lumbar pars interarticularis: the development of a new MRI classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(2):181–6.
Leone A, Cianfoni A, Cerase A, Magarelli N, Bonomo L. Lumbar spondylolysis: a review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(6):683–700.
Yamaguchi Jr KT, Skaggs DL, Acevedo DC, Myung KS, Choi P, Andras L. Spondylolysis is frequently missed by MRI in adolescents with back pain. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(3):237–40.
Hession PR, Butt WP. Imaging of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Eur Radiol. 1996;6(3):284–90.
Love TW, Fagan AB, Fraser RD. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: developmental or acquired? J Bone Joint Sur Br. 1999;81-B(4):670–4.
Sienkiewicz PJ, Flatley TJ. Postoperative spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:172–80.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonza’lez A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.
Image Gently Web site. http://www.imagegently.org/. Accessed 19 Aug 2013.
Image Wisely Web site. http://www.imagewisely.org/ Accessed 19 Aug 2013.
1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):1–201.
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332.
Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80:639–47.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations; 2010.
Simpson AK, Whang PG, Jonisch A, Haims A, Grauer JN. The radiation exposure associated with cervical and lumbar spine radiographs. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:409–12.
Hansen J, Joric AG, Fiirgaard B, Egund N. Optimisation of scoliosis examination in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:752–65.
Gialousis G, Yiakoumakis EN, Makri TK, Papadoupoulou D, Karlatira M, Karaisakos P, Papaodysseas S, Evlogias N, Dimitriou PA, Georgiou EK. Comparison of dose from radiological examination for scoliosis in children among two pediatric hospitals by Monte Carlo simulation. Health Phys. 2008;94:471–8.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.
Mettler Jr FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004;230:619–28.
Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:191–9.
Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic exams. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1882–9.
Richards PJ, Goerge J, Metelko M, Brown M. Spine computed tomography doses and cancer induction. Spine. 2010;35:430–3.
Kasim AK, Overgaard A, Maly P, Ohlin A, Gunnarsson M, Sundgren PC. Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:610–8.
ACR-SPR practice guideline for the performance of skeletal scintigraphy (bone scan). American College of Radiology; 2012.
Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, Eck JC, Lapinsky A, Connolly PJ, DiPaola CP. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine. 2013;38:E306–12.
Kraus MD, Krischak G, Keppler P, Gebhard FT, Schuetz UHW. Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2419–29.
Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, Ozdoba C, Vock P. Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine. 1999;24:975–82.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thornhill, B.A., Green, D.J., Schoenfeld, A.H. (2015). Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Spondylolisthesis. In: Wollowick, A., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7574-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7575-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)