Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Results of Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis

  • Chapter
Spondylolisthesis

  • 2478 Accesses

Abstract

Patients with low grade spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis rarely require surgery, as a majority respond to activity modification, NSAIDs, or physical therapy. For symptomatic patients who do not respond to conservative measures, surgical management is indicated. This may be accomplished with direct pars interarticularis repair by compression screw, wiring technique, sublaminar-hook-screw construct, or modifications thereof. Additionally, posterolateral fusion with or without instrumentation offers similar subjective, clinical, and functional long-term outcomes to direct repair with a tradeoff of longer surgical time with greater exposure needed. Overall, both procedures offer good and excellent outcomes, even with radiographic findings of pseudarthrosis. For patients with high grade slip, in situ fusion or reduction and fusion are both valid options and depend upon surgeon experience and underlying patient function and neurologic status. For patients undergoing reduction, wide decompression and instrumentation with either circumferential or interbody fusion provide stable long-term results. Interbody fusion techniques show greater long-term fusion rates, achieve greater reduction, and appear to have higher functional outcome compared to posterior-only fusion. Reduction carries increased risk of neurologic injury, but the majority of these including cauda equina resolve. Long-term follow-up comparing in situ fusion to reduction with fusion of high grade spondylolisthesis has shown improved ODI and SRS scores with fusion in situ. Grade V spondylolisthesis presents several unique challenges for surgical repair and may be fused in situ from an anterior or posterior approach, with partial reduction, or Gaines procedure. Current trends have moved towards posterior-only approach with combined posterior and interbody fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:23–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932;54:371–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kimura M. Seikei Geka. 1968;19(4):285–96. Japanese.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52:432–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buck JE. Abstract: further thoughts on direct repair of the defect in spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pederson AK, Hagen R. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Treatment by internal fixation and bone-grafting of the defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(1):15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hambly MF, Wiltse LL. A modification of the Scott wiring technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(3):354–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson GV, Thompson AG. The Scott wiring technique for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(3):426–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicol RO, Scott JH. Lytic spondylolysis. Repair by wiring. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986;11(10):1027–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Giudici F, Minoia L, Archetti M, Corriero AS, Zagra A. Long-term results of the direct repair of spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 1:S115–20. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1759-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Askar Z, Wardlaw D, Koti M. Scott wiring for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(4):354–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Songer MN, Rovin R. Repair of the pars interarticularis defect with a cable-screw construct. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(2):263–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlenzka D, Remes V, Helenius I, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Yrjönen T, Tallroth K, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Poussa M. Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1437–47. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillet P, Petit M. Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(12):1252–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakiuchi M. Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. Durable fixation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(6):818–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Repair of defects in spondylolysis by segmental pedicular screw hook fixation. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(17):2041–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Winter M, Jani L. Results of screw osteosynthesis in spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(2):96–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karatas AF, Dede O, Atanda AA, Holmes L Jr, Rogers K, Gabos P, Shah SA. Comparison of direct pars repair techniques of spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent patients: pars compression screw versus pedicle screw-rod-hook. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012.

  19. Shin MH, Ryu KS, Rathi NK, Park CK. Direct pars repair surgery using two different surgical methods: pedicle screw with universal hook system and direct pars screw fixation in symptomatic lumbar spondylosis patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;51(1):14–9. doi:10.3340/jkns.2012.51.1.14. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noggle JC, Sciubba DM, Samdani AF, Anderson DG, Betz RR, Asghar J. Minimally invasive direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a pedicle screw and hook construct. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(2):E15. doi:10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Menga EN, Kebaish KM, Jain A, Carrino JA, Sponseller PD. Clinical results and functional outcomes after direct intralaminar screw repair of spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(1):104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Girardo M, Bettini N, Dema E, Cervellati S. Uninstrumented posterolateral spinal arthrodesis: is it the gold standard technique for I degrees and II degrees grade spondylolisthesis in adolescence? Eur Spine J. 2009;18 Suppl 1:126–32. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0983-z. Epub 2009 May 5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanton RP, Meehan P, Lovell WW. Surgical fusion in childhood spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5(4):411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burkus JK, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, et al. Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:693–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Velikas EP, Blackburne JS. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(1):67–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Poussa M, Osterman K. Operative treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: direct repair of the defect or segmental spinal fusion? Eur Spine J. 1993;2(2):104–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Helenius I, Lamberg T, Osterman K, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Tervahartiala P, Seitsalo S, Poussa M, Remes V. Scoliosis research society outcome instrument in evaluation of long-term surgical results in spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Müslüman AM, Yılmaz A, Cansever T, Cavuşoğlu H, Colak I, Genç HA, Aydın Y. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(4):488–96. doi:10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10281. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frennered AK, Danielson BI, Nachemson AL, Nordwall AB. Midterm follow-up of young patients fused in situ for spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(4):409–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fu KM, Smith JS, Polly Jr DW, Perra JH, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp Jr DR, Hart RA, Donaldson 3rd WF, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI. Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of six hundred five pediatric patients with isthmic or dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(4):308–12. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf3a1d.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gill GG, Manning JG, White HL. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion; excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A(3):493–520.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Amuso SJ, Neff RS, Coulson DB, Laing PG. The surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by posterior element resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(3):529–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Osterman K, Lindholm TS, Laurent LE. Late results of removal of the loose posterior element (Gill’s operation) in the treatment of lytic lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:121–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farrokhi MR, Rahmanian A, Masoudi MS. Posterolateral versus posterior interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(8):1567–73. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.2167. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ. In situ posterolateral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV, and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(4):506–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Newton PO, Johnston 2nd CE. Analysis and treatment of poor outcomes following in situ arthrodesis in adolescent spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(6):754–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D, Betz RR, Baldus C, Schoenecker PL. Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):433–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Ungacta FF, Riew KD. Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(16):1701–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Helenius I, Remes V, Poussa M. Uninstrumented in situ fusion for high-grade childhood and adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: long-term outcome. Surgical technique J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 2 Pt 1):145–52. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Remes V, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Poussa M. Long-term outcome after posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion for high-grade isthmicspondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: magnetic resonance imaging findings after average of 17-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(21):2491–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MG. An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine. 1996;21:1133–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. DeWald RL, Faut MM, Taddonio RF, Neuwirth MG. Severe lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in adolescents and children. Reduction and staged circumferential fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(4):619–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith JA, Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F, Bradford DS. Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade l5–s1 spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(20):2227–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sasso RC, Shively KD, Reilly TM. Transvertebral transsacral strut grafting for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5–S1 with fibular allograft. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(5):328–33. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318149e7ea.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lehmer SM, Steffee AD, Gaines Jr RW. Treatment of L5–S1 spondyloptosis by staged L5 resection with reduction and fusion of L4 onto S1 (Gaines procedure). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(17):1916–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schoenecker PL, Cole HO, Herring JA, Capelli AM, Bradford DS. Cauda equina syndrome after in situ arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis at the lumbosacral junction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):369–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bozarth GR, Fogel GR, Toohey JS, Neidre A. Repair of pars interarticularis defect with a modified cable-screw construct. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2007;16(2):79–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maurice HD, Morley TR. Cauda equine lesions following fusion in situ and decompressive laminectomy for severe spondylolisthesis. Four case reports. Spine. 1989;1:214–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith MD, Bohlman HH. Spondylolisthesis treated by a single-stage operation combining decompression with in situ posterolateral and anterior fusion. An analysis of eleven patients who had long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):415–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(7):1060–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Boos N, Marchesi D, Zuber K, Aebi M. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by reduction and pedicular fixation. A 4-6-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(12):1655–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Burkus JK, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Denis F. Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(5):693–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schwend RM, Waters PM, Hey LA, Hall JE, Emans JB. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in children by reduction and L4–S4 posterior segmental hyperextension fixation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(6):703–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Laursen M, Thomsen K, Eiskjaer SP, Hansen ES, Bünger CE. Functional outcome after partial reduction and 360 degree fusion in grade III–V spondylolisthesis in adolescent and adult patients. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(4):300–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Roca J, Ubierna MT, Cáceres E, Iborra M. One-stage decompression and posterolateral and interbody fusion for severe spondylolisthesis. An analysis of 14 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(7):709–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Evaluation and surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:525–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Osterman K. Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Reduction or fusion in situ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(7):894–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Helenius I, Lamberg T, Osterman K, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Tervahartiala P, Seitsalo S, Poussa M, Remes V. Posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients: a long-term evaluation using the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(2):190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, Lenke LG. Dowel fibular strut grafts for high-grade dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(18):1982–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lakshmanan P, Ahuja S, Lewis M, Howes J, Davies PR. Transsacral screw fixation for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2009;9(12):1024–9. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.456. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bohlman HH, Cook SS. One-stage decompression and posterolateral and interbody fusion for lumbosacral spondyloptosis through a posterior approach. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(3):415–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jones AA, McAfee PC, Robinson RA, Zinreich SJ, Wang H. Failed arthrodesis of the spine for severe spondylolisthesis. Salvage by interbody arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(1):25–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gaines RW, Nichols WK. Treatment of spondyloptosis by two stage L5 vertebrectomy and reduction of L4 onto S1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(7):680–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Gaines RW. L5 vertebrectomy for the surgical treatment of spondyloptosis: thirty cases in 25 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(6 Suppl):S66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kalra K, Kohli S, Dhar S. A modified Gaines procedure for spondyloptosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(11):1589–91. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.24382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287-0882, USA

    Adam C. Shaner M.D.

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hopkins Bloomberg Children’s Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Paul D. Sponseller M.D., M.B.A.

Authors
  1. Adam C. Shaner M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul D. Sponseller M.D., M.B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Sponseller M.D., M.B.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

    Adam L. Wollowick

  2. Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA

    Vishal Sarwahi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaner, A.C., Sponseller, P.D. (2015). Results of Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis. In: Wollowick, A., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7574-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7575-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation