Advertisement

Network Analysis and Simulation

  • Carl Van DykeEmail author
  • Marc Meketon
  • Bruce W. Patty
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 222)

Abstract

Railroad operations are complex processes incorporating several different decisions in order to move a railcar from one location to another. These decisions are often made separately without the ability to easily understand the impact of one decision on another. For example, if a new train is added, and another removed, will the expected connections of the traffic from those trains to subsequent trains still be acceptable, will the network capacity still be sufficient, and will the yards be able to handle the changes in workload? The role of the network simulation capability is to allow analysts to understand how all these disparate pieces fit together, primarily in the context of evaluating operating plan designs and contingency planning.

Keywords

Network Simulation Operating Plan Trip Plan Train Schedule Unit Train 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen WB, Mahmoud MM, McNeil D (1985) The importance of time in transit and reliability of transit time for shippers, receivers, and carriers. Transport Res B 19(5):447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allman WP (1966) A computer simulation model of railroad freight transportation system. Proceedings of 4th international conference on operations research, Wiley, pp 339–351Google Scholar
  3. Allman WP (1966) A network simulation approach to the railroad freight train scheduling and car sorting problem, Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballou RH (2004) Business logistics: supply chain management. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 14Google Scholar
  5. Bellman JA (1967) Railroad network model. Second international symposium on the use of cybernetics on the railways, Montreal, Canada. Proceedings edited by International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanes CA, Barnhart C, Johnson EL, Marsten RE, Nemhauser GL, Sigismondi G (1995) The fleet assignment problem: solving a large-scale integer program. Math Program 70:211–232Google Scholar
  7. Ireland P, Case R, Fallis J, Van Dyke C, Kuehn J, Meketon M (2004) The Canadian Pacific Railway transforms operations by using models to develop its operating plans. Interfaces 34(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo M, Meketon M (1997) A train scheduling model for reducing locomotive requirements. INFORMS National Meeting, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. Martland CD (1982) PMAKE analysis: predicting rail yard time distributions using probabilistic train connection standards. Transport Sci 16(4):476–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McCarren JR, Martland CD (1980) The MIT service planning model. Studies in Railroad Operations and Economics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, vol 31 Cambridge, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. McGinnis MK (1990) The relative importance of cost and service in freight transportation choice before and after deregulation. Transport J 30(1):12–19Google Scholar
  12. Petersen ER, Fullerton HV (1975) The railcar network model, Canadian Institute of Guided Ground Transport, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, CIGGT Report No. 75-11Google Scholar
  13. Powell W, Bouzaiene‐Ayari B, Lawrence C, Cheng C, Das S, Fiorillo R (2014) Locomotive planning at Norfolk Southern: an optimizing‐simulator using approximate dynamic programming. Interf Art Adv (http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2014.0741)
  14. Roberts K, Holcomb M (2012) Key factors and trends in transportation mode and carrier selection, pursuit. J Undergraduate Res Univ Tennessee 4(1):41–52Google Scholar
  15. Siddiqee W, D’Esopo DA (1977) Computer-aided methodologies to develop blocking and train operations strategies for railroad networks. SRI International, Business Intelligence Program. Menlo Park, CA USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Siddiqee W, D’Esopo DA (1975) User’s manual for the network analysis computer programs. SRI International, Business Intelligence Program. Menlo Park, CA USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Siddiqee W, D’Esopo DA, Tuan PL (1975) Blocking and train operations planning, SRI International, National Technical Information Service, 1975, USRA-R-106.1 Final Report, Accession No. 00129799. Menlo Park, CA USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Stewart JC (1980) A decision support system for railroad freight operations management, M.S. Thesis, Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Vaidyanathan B, Jha KC, Ahuja RK (2007) Multicommodity network flow approach to the railroad crew-scheduling problem. IBM J Res Dev 51(3/4):325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Dyke CD (1981) Microcomputers and the service planning model: designing a more useful tool for the rail industry, M.S. Thesis, Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson PB, Hudson CJ (1970) Development, validation and application of the CN network model. Third international symposium on railway cybernetics, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TransNetOptPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Oliver WymanPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.Veritec SolutionsSan RafaelUSA

Personalised recommendations