Abstract
The response-to-intervention (RTI) or multi-tiered systems of supports (MTSS) framework has quickly emerged as a methodology for improving outcomes for all students. While as many as 60 % of districts are implementing this framework throughout the country, the real challenge lies in sustaining this innovation over the long term. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss how educators and systems can institutionalize RTI/MTSS in ways that preserve the positive changes and instill resilience in resisting efforts to revert back to the old ways of doing things in schools. It is suggested that in order to effectively manage and sustain the change process, districts need to attend to seven imperative components: (a) Leadership, (b) Vision and Culture, (c) Infrastructure, (d) Resources, (e) Implementation Plans, (f) Professional Development (knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy), and (g) Incentives. This chapter describes each of these components along with practical suggestions at the local educational agency level. In addition, measuring implementation at both the state and local level is discussed. Finally, the chapter concludes with lessons learned and implications for practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allison, E., Besser, L., Campsen, L., Cordova, J., Doubek, B., Gregg, L., Kamm, C., Nielsen, K., Peery, A., Pitchford, B., Rose, A., Ventura, S., & White, M. (2010). Data teams: The big picture—looking at data teams through a collaborative lens. Englewood: Lead & Learn Press.
Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J., Prasse, D., Reschly, D., Schrag, J., & Tilly, D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria: National Association of Directors in Special Education.
Batsche, G., Curtis, M., Dorman, C., Castillo, J., & Porter, L. (2007). The Florida problem-solving/response to intervention model: Implementing a statewide initiative. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assessing preservice teachers’ training in empirically-validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 262–285.
Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response-to-intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford.
Burns, M. K. (2007). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response–to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 297–313.
Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. (2012). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Callender, W. (2009). The Idaho results-based model: Implementing response to intervention statewide. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1998). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington: Solution Tress Press.
Eric, H., Paul, P., & Ludger, W. (2010). U. S. math performance in global perspective: How well does each state do at producing high-achieving students? Boston: Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance Report No. 10–19.
Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.
Ferriter, W., Graham, P., & Wight, M. (2013). Making teamwork meaningful: Leading progress-driven collaboration in a PLC at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blaise, K., Friedman, R., & Wallace, F. (2007). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
Hanushek, E., Peterson, P., & Woessmann, L. (2010). U.S. math performance in global perspective: How well does each state do at producing high achieving students? Cambridge: Harvard University. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED513539.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.
Hess, F. M. (2013). Cage-busting leadership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hoerr, T. (2005). The art of school leadership. Alexandria: ASCD.
Honore’, R. (2012). Leadership in the new normal: A short course. Lafayette: Acadian House.
Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Todd, A. W., Newton, J. S., & Sprague, J. R. (2010). Designing and implementing individualized positive behavior support. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.
Jackson, Y., & McDermott, V. (2012). Aim high, achieve more: How to transform urban schools through fearless leadership. Alexandria: ASCD.
Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: Can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement? Education Next, 11, 1–11.
Knoster, T., & George, H. P. (2002). Realizing durable and systemic behavior change in schools: Guiding questions. NASP Communique, 30(6), 34–37.
Kratochwill, T. R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
Levin, H. M., Catlin, D., & Elson, A. (2005). Costs of implementing adolescent literacy programs. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005) School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria: ASCD.
McCormick, L. K., Steckler, A. B., & McLeroy, K. R. (1995). Diffusion of innovations in schools—A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 210–219.
McNulty, B., & Besser, L. (2011) Leaders make it happen: An administrator’s guide to data teams. Englewood: Lead & Learn Press.
Mellard, D. F., & McKnight, M. A. (2006). RTI implementation tool for reading: Best practices [Brochure]. Lawrence: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
Murphy, C. (2006). The whole-faculty study groups fieldbook: Lessons learned and best practices from classrooms, districts, and schools. New York: Corwin.
National Institutes of Health. (2013). Frequently asked questions about implementation science. http://www.fic.nih.gov/News/Events/implementation-science/Pages/faqs.aspx. Accessed 19 March 2013.
Payne, C. (2008). So much reform so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L., Yoon, K. S., & Bierman, B. F. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research in Behavioral Sciences.
Project Forum. (2007). Response to intervention as it relates to early intervening services: Recommendations. Alexandria: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
Reeves, D. (2005). Accountability in action: A blueprint for learning organizations. Englewood: Lead & Learn Press.
Reynolds, C., & Shaywitz, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2) 130–145.
Roach, A., & Elliott, S. (2008). Best practices in facilitating and evaluating implementation integrity. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 195–208). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Sailor, W. (2009). Making RtI work: How smart schools are reforming education through schoolwide response-to-intervention. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Samuels, C. A., Sawchuk, S., Zehr, M. A., Kelleher, M., & Sparks, S. D. (2011, March 2). Special report: Response to intervention’s promise and pitfalls. Education Week, pp. S1–S16.
Sanetti, L. M. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445–459.
Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Seashore, L. K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Final report of Research to The Wallace Foundation. University of Minnesota and University of Toronto.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The arts and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Shelton, S. (2011). Strong leaders strong schools: 2010 school leadership laws. New York: Wallace Foundation.
Sherer, J., & Spillane, J. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Review, 113(3), 611–657.
Simmons, W. (2012). Data as a lever for improving instruction and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–9.
Spectrum K12 School Solutions. (2010). Response to Intervention Adoption Study. http://rti.pearsoned.com/docs/RTIsite/2010RTIAdoptionSurveyReport.pdf.
Technology and Information Education Services. (2013). TIES Data System [Computer software]. St. Paul, MN: TIES. http://www.ties.k12.mn.us.
The Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning.
Ward, R. (2004). Defining the school’s culture. In R. Ward & M. Burke (Eds.), Improving achievement in low performing schools: Key results for school leaders. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–9.
White, J., Kumpke, P., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2007). School psychologists’ use and awareness of treatment guidelines: Present and future. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Wiener, R. M., & Soodak, L. C. (2008). Special education administrators’ perspectives on response to intervention. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21, 39–45.
Zamuda, A., Kuklis, R., & Kline, E., (2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Alexandria: ASCD.
Zirkel, P. (2011). Professional practice: State laws and guidelines for RtI: Additional implementation features. NASP Communique, 39(7), 21–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbons, K., Coulter, W. (2016). Making Response to Intervention Stick: Sustaining Implementation Past Your Retirement. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7567-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7568-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)