Skip to main content

Teacher Formative Assessment: The Missing Link in Response to Intervention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Response to Intervention

Abstract

Response to intervention (RTI) focuses on the assessment, intervention, and progress monitoring of student academic performance and social behavior. Despite requiring highly qualified personnel for successful implementation, the implementation of RTI has not focused on applying its foundational principles towards promoting teacher effectiveness through assessment, intervention, and progress monitoring of teacher classroom practice. Compounding this problem is the lack of availability of reliable and valid teacher assessments to apply in an RTI model for teacher professional development. This chapter provides a rationale for applying RTI principles to teacher professional development and how teacher formative assessment can improve educator effectiveness, student learning, and social behaviors. The Classroom Strategies Scale (CSS), a new multidimensional assessment of instructional and behavioral management practices, is discussed as an example of one promising tool for promoting teachers’ professional development within an RTI model. We offer a synthesis of the theory, research, and evidence of reliability and validity of the CSS. The application of teacher formative assessment in job-embedded professional development/coaching models for schools is discussed. Finally, implications for practice and research are outlined.

Author Note: The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305A080337 and US Department of Education–Teacher Incentive Fund Program, through Grant S374A120060 to Rutgers University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education. Correspondence concerning this chapter should be addressed to Linda A. Reddy, Ph.D. Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ. 08854; E-mail: LReddy@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide (pp. 587–590). Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (2004). Better teachers, better preschools: Student achievement linked to teacher qualifications. http://nieer.org/resources/policybriefs/2.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2013.

  • Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention policy considerations and implementation. Reston: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batsche, G., Curtis, J., Dorman, C., Castillo, J., & Porter, L. J. (2008). The Florida problem solving/response to intervention model: Implementing a statewide initiative. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 378–395). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K. D., Bradshaw, C. P., Domitrovich, C., & Ialongo, N. S. (2013). Coaching teachers to improve implementation of the good behavior game. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(6), 482–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, W. N. (2008). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: Best teaching practices for general and special educators (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, N. (1988). The effective primary school teacher: The search for a theory of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1(7), 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, C. L., Obrochta, C., & Fogelberg, E. (2005). Literacy coaching for change. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2012). Structural equation modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn’t always a good idea. Educational, Leadership, 49(2), 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, S., & Kane, T. J. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET Project’s three-year study. www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Ensuring_Fair_and_Reliable_Measures_Practitioner_Brief.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.

  • Carlisle, J. F., Correnti, R., Phelps, G., & Zeng, J. (2009). Exploration of the contribution of teachers’ knowledge about reading to their students’ improvement in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 459–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, K., & Bizo, L. A. (2004). Specific praise improves on-task behavior and numeracy enjoyment: A study of 4 pupils engaged in the numeracy hour. Educational psychology in Practice, 20, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chunn, M., & Witt, J. (2008). System to enhance educational performance. http://www.isteep.com/index.html. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.

  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., Son, S. H., Hindman, A., & Morrison, F. J. (2005). Teacher qualifications, classroom practices, and family characteristics: Complex effects on first graders’ language and early reading. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 343–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. D., Zucker, T. A., Williams, J. M., Bhavsar, V., & Landry, S. H. (in press). Initial validation of the pre-kindergarten classroom observational tool and goal setting system for data-based coaching. School Psychology Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional learning. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis and Archives, 8(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., Van Voorhis, F. L., Martin, C. S., Thomas, B. G., Greenfeld, M. D., Hutchins, D. J., & Williams, K. J. (2008). School, family, and community partnerships: Youth handbook for action (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, L. M. (2002). Preschool policy matters; High-quality preschool: Why we need it and what it looks like. http://nieer.org/resources/policybriefs/1.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2013.

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R., Hester, P., Rock, M., & Hughes, K. (2009). Back to basics: Rules, praise, ignoring, and reprimands revisited. Intervention in School & Clinic, 44(4), 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, T. A., & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for Response to Intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1980). Educational psychology: A realistic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A., Burns, M. K., Parson, L. B., Tilly, W. D., & VanDerHeyden, A. (2007). Response to intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (1998). Effective teaching: A review of the literature. School Leadership & Management, 18, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, (1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on students learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G. III, & Milanowski, A. (2004). Alignment of human resource practices and teacher performance competency. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, C. V., Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L., Gillapsy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Pretti-Frontczak, K., Harsjusola-Webb, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Romani, J. (2009). Response to intervention: Implications for early childhood professionals. Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders in Schools, 40, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. (2008). Terminology, emphasis, and utility in validation [Peer Commentary on the paper A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education]. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. MET Research Paper. Seattle, Washington: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. http://www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Gathering_Feedback_Research_Paper.pdf. 16 July 2012.

  • Kern, L., & Clemmens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29, 480–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 087).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1987). The accuracy of principals’ judgments of teacher performance. Journal of Educational Research, 80(4), 242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellard, D. F., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4) 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem, E., Gleacher, A., & Beidas, R. S. (2013). Consultation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based practices across multiple contexts: Unpacking the black box. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(6), 530–540.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2007). Policy considerations and implementation and response to intervention: NASDSE and CASE white paper on RTI. www.nasdse.org. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.

  • National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. committee on educational interventions for children with autism. In L. Catherine & J. P. McGee (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odden, A., & Kelly, J. (2008). Strategic management of human capital in public education. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Strategic Management of Human Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partin, T., Robertson, R., Maggin, D., Oliver, R., & Wehby, J. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system [CLASS] manual: Pre-K. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Downer, J. (2011). Aligning measures of quality with professional development goals and goals for children’s development. In M. Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout, & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality measurement in early childhood settings (pp. 297–315). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. (2014). Teacher progress monitoring of instructional and behavioral management practices: An evidence-based approach to improving classroom practices. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 2, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L., Fabiano, G., Barbarasch, B., & Dudek, C. (2012). Behavior management of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders using teacher and student progress monitoring. In L.M. Crothers & J.B. Kolbert (Eds.), Understanding and managing behaviors of children with psychological disorders: A reference for classroom teachers. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G., Dudek, C., & Hsu, L. (2013a). Development and construct validation of the classroom strategies scale–observer form. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 317–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. (2013b). Predictive validity of the classroom strategies scale–observer form on statewide testing. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 301–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G., Dudek, C., & Hsu, L. (2013c). Instructional and behavior management practices implemented by elementary general education teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 683–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L., Fabiano, G., & Jimerson, S. (2013). Assessment of general education teachers’ tier 1 classroom practices: Current science and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 273–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G., & Dudek, C. (2013). Concurrent validity of the classroom strategies scale–observer form. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Kettler, R. J., & Kurz, A. (2015). School-wide educator evaluation for improving school capacity and student achievement in high poverty schools: Year 1 of the school system improvement project. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Newman, E., & Verdesco, A. (2015a). Students with ADHD: Using self-regulated learning interventions and student and teacher formative assessment. In T. Cleary (Ed.), Self-regulated learning interventions with at-risk populations: Academic, mental health, and contextual considerations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Newman, E. & Verdesco, A. (2015b). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders: Using cognitive behavioral interventions and teacher formative assessment in schools. In R. Flanagan & C. Allen (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral therapies for children in schools. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., Fabiano, G., & Peters, S. (2015c). Measuring teacher self-report on classroom practices: Construct validity and reliability of the Classroom Strategies Scale – Teacher Form. School Psychology Quarterly.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2) 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L. (2000). Value-added assessment from student achievement data: Opportunities and hurdles. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory, and practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss, P. J., & Smith, M. A. (1998). Applied behavior analysis in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. E., Cortina, K. S., & Carlisle, J. F. (2012). Understanding coach-based professional development in reading first: How do coaches spend their time and how do teachers perceive coaches’ work? Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(1), 68–85. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2011.569845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, E. S., Marinez-Lora, A., Frazier, S. L., Jakobsons, L. J., Atkins, M. S., & Bonner, D. (2011a). Teachers supporting teachers in urban schools: What iterative research designs can teach us. School Psychology Review, 40, 465–485.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, E. S., Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., Torf, R., & Spencer, J. (2011b). A qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among urban teachers. School Mental Health, 3(2), 59–69. doi:10.1007/s12310-011-9051-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, E. S., Lakind, D., Frazier, S. L., & Jakobsons, L. (2015). Coaching early career teachers in urban elementary schools: A mixed method study. School Mental Health, 7, 6–20. doi:10.1007/s12310-014-9136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, E. S., Jakobsons, L., Lakind, D., Frazier, S. L., Marinez-Lora, A., Hamre, B. K., Patel, D., Atkins, M. S., Parker Katz, M., Neal, J., & Smylie, M. (under review). Enhancing urban early career teachers’ effectiveness and connectedness: A mixed method study. Manuscript submitted for publication to American Education Research Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitcher, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Whittaker, T. A., Richter, M., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2009). Assessing teacher use of opportunities to respond and effective classroom management strategies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Yoder, P. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, K. S., Adler, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toch, T., & Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, DC: Education Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A., & Edison, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades K-5. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, C. A. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction (DI) and understanding by design (UbD). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In M. Wittorck (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C. (1991). Productive teaching and instruction: Assessing the knowledge base. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 470–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walhberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, B. (1985). Teacher development: The challenge of the future. In S. Hord, S. O’ Neal, & M. Smith (Eds.), Beyond the looking glass (pp. 283–312). Austin: The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. http://widgeteffect.org/. Accessed 2 June 2009.

  • White, M. A. (1975). Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 8, 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda A. Reddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reddy, L., Dudek, C., Shernoff, E. (2016). Teacher Formative Assessment: The Missing Link in Response to Intervention. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics