Abstract
Approximately 20 years ago when I was a graduate student in the psycholinguistics and speech-language pathology programs at the University of Illinois, Tom Shriner, Carol Prutting, and I began our endless discussions about pragmatics, although we didn’t use that term then. We were trying to integrate three modes of thinking about language that existed in three physically distinct locations on campus. One mode of thinking about language was linguistics. In linguistics classes we discussed Chomsky’s theory of generative grammar, a language theory with such profound implications that it was receiving extraordinary attention even in the popular literature. Chomsky’s theory rested on three fundamental assumptions. One was that the domain of linguistic theory was the characterization of the abstract rules of language as language competence rather than language performance. The second assumption was that the primary power of language resided in syntax. The third assumption was that knowledge of syntax could be described independently from the other levels of language knowledge, phonology and semantics. In linguistics classes we analyzed sentences as they “might be written on a blackboard” and we conceptualized language as an abstract, symbolic code. In psychology seminars, brilliant scholars, such as Charles Osgood, taught us about the principles of mediational behavioristic psychology and how these principles were evident in language performance. In these classes we discussed behavior and language. In speech-language pathology, we worked with children and adults who were language disordered. These people were having such difficulty communicating that their functional capabilities were reduced significantly from those of their chronological peer groups. Problems with trying to deal with communication difficulties by viewing language as simply a symbolic code, however elegant, or viewing language as simply another form of behavior were haunting. Although we did not have theoretical models that adequately characterized it as such or a vocabulary that provided a means for making clear references to it, we struggled with trying to deal with communication, language as behavior, with language as it was used by people in their daily lives. This meant that we somehow had to conceptualize language as a code that was used by people to do things. As I review the clinical literature over the last 20 years I think that my experience as a graduate student was to some extent a microcosm of the tensions and struggles that have characterized the study of language disorders itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bates, E. (1976). Language in context. New York: Academic Press.
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., and Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bedwinek, A. (1983). The use of PACE to facilitate gestural and verbal communication in a language-impaired child. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 2–6.
Blagden, C., & McConnell, N. (1985). Interpersonal language skills assessment. Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
Bray, C., and Wiig, E. (1987). Let’s talk inventory for children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Brinton, B. (1990). Peer commentary on “Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations” by Tanya Gallagher. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 14 (1), 7–8.
Craig, H. K. (1983). Applications of pragmatic language models for intervention. In T. M. Gallagher and C. A. Prutting (Eds.), Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language (pp. 101–127 ). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Craig, H. K. (1990). Peer commentary on “Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations” by Tanya Gallagher. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 14 (1), 8–9.
Duchan, J. (1984). Language assessment: The pragmatics revolution. In R. Naremore (Ed.), Language science. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Gallagher, T. (1983). Pre-assessment: A procedure for accommodating language use variability. In T. Gallagher & C. Prutting (Eds.), Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language (pp. 1–28 ). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Gallagher, T. (1990). Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 14 (1), 3–6.
Lund, N., and Duchan, J. (1988). Assessing children’s language in naturalistic contexts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McLean, J., and Snyder-McLean, L. (1988). Application of pragmatics to severely mentally retarded children and youth. In R. L. Schiefelbusch and L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention ( 2nd ed., pp. 255–288 ). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
McTear, M. (1985). Pragmatic disorders: A question of direction. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 20, 119–127.
Muma, J. (1975). The communication game: Dump and play. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 296–309.
Olswang, L., Kriegsmann, E., and Mastergeorge, A. (1982). Facilitating functional requesting in pragmatically impaired children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 202–222.
Owens, R. (1991). Language disorders: A functional approach to assessment and intervention. New York: Macmillan.
Penn, C. (1988). The profiling of syntax and pragmatics in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 2, 179–207.
Prutting, C., and Kirchner, D. (1983). Applied pragmatics. In T. Gallagher and C. Prutting (Eds.), Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language (pp. 29–64 ). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Prutting, C., and Kirchner, D. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.
Rees, N. (1978). Pragmatics of language: Applications to normal and disordered language development. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Bases of language intervention. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Rees, N. (Speaker) (1988). Pragmatics: A retrospective analysis (Cassette Recording H81118–110 ). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Roth, F., and Spekman, N. (1984). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part I. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 2–11.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shulman, B. (1986). Test of Pragmatic Skills—Revised. Tuscon, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
Skarakis-Doyle, E. (1990). Peer commentary on “Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations” by Tanya Gallagher. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 14 (1), 7–8.
VanRiper, C. (1939). Speech correction: Principles and methods. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Wood, B. (1977a). Development of functional communication competencies pre-K through grade 6. Urbana, IL: Eric Clearinghouse in Reading Communication Skills.
Wood, B. (1977b). Development of functional communication competencies grade 7–12. Urbana, IL: Eric Clearinghouse in Reading Communication Skills.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallagher, T.M. (1991). A Retrospective Look at Clinical Pragmatics. In: Gallagher, T.M. (eds) Pragmatics of Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7156-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7156-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-46850-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7156-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive