Skip to main content
  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate hearing aid and earmould for a client does not signify the end of the hearing aid fitting procedure. Some process must be employed to judge the benefit provided by the aid in terms of its effectiveness and acceptability. Hearing aid evaluation must consider not only the technical dimensions of the aid, but also the subjective opinion of the user, since a hearing aid will provide no benefit unless it is worn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bench, J., Kowal, A. and Bamford, J.M. (1979) The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) Sentence Lists for Partially Hearing Children. British Journal of Audiology, 13, 108–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. (1968) The Arthur Boothroyd (AB) Word Lists, Manchester University, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standards Institution (1980) BS 5966: Specification for Audiometers, British Standards Institution, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1988) The Relative Accuracy of Coupler and Behavioural Estimates of the Real Ear Gain of a Hearing Aid. British Journal of Audiology, 22, 35–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., Day, S. and Bamford, J. (1989) A Comparative Evaluation of Four Hearing Aid Selection Procedures, II-Quality Judgements as Measures of Benefit. British Journal of Audiology, 23, 201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, F. (1986) The Manchester Picture Test, Manchester University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutman, M.E., Brown, EJ. and Coles, R.R.A. (1987) Self-Reported Disability and Handicap in the Population in Relation to Pure-Tone Threshold, Age, Sex and Type of Hearing Loss. British Journal of Audiology, 21(1), 45–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, M. (1990) The Application of Real Ear Probe Tube Measurements to Hearing Aid Fitting. Acoustic Letters, 14(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Pollack, M.C. (1988) Amplification for the Hearing-Impaired, 3rd edn, Grune and Stratton, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, I. and Nolan, M. (1984) Educational Audiology, Croom Helm, Beckenham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Maryanne Tate

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tate, M. (1994). Evaluation. In: Principles of Hearing Aid Audiology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7152-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7152-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-49070-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7152-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics