Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper presents a broader conception of control, exploring its role within pluralistic organization. Reconceptualization is necessary because conventional authoritative and consensual versions of the managerial control model fail to take account of autonomous activity. An alternative conception, regarding controlling as causing and attributing control to all sources of stability and change, is needed to recognize that forces other than senior management can and do shape organizational order. Control is not management’s prerogative; organizations are also self-governed through the assumptions, principles and rules underlying their beliefs and behaviours. Control is, thus, a non-cybernetic system encompassing both managerial and autonomous activity. Repositioning the conventional model within a pluralistic framework provides an understanding of why conceptualizing control as the cybernetic implementation of management’s intentions has often obscured rather than illuminated the concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ackoff, R., The Art of Problem Solving (New York: John Wiley, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G.T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F.H., Institutional behavior (Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I., Strategic Issue Management, Strategic Management Journal (1980) pp. 131-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I., Managing Discontinuous Strategic Change, in Ansoff, H.I., Bosnian, A. and Strom, P.M. (eds) Understanding and Managing Strategic Change pp. 1-21. (NY: Elsevier, North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R.N., Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Reasoning, Learning and Action (San Francisco, CA: Jossey—Bass, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, R.H., Deviation — Amplifying Feedback and Unintended Consequences of Management Accounting Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1976) pp. 397-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., Structure of Decision (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. & Aiken, M., Structural and Process Constraints on Influence in Organizations: A Level-specific Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly (1976) pp. 633-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. & Lawler, E., Power and Politics in Organizations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey—Bass, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barchrach, P. & Baratz, M., Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J.K., The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy, Administrative Science Quarterly (1975) pp. 229-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J.K., Organizations: A Dialectical View, Administrative Science Quarterly (March 1977) pp. 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, J.C., Turopolec, L. & Found, S.M., The Organizational Context of Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1983) pp. 111-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P., Exchange and Power in Social Life (New York, NY: John Wiley, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R.J., Control, Causality and Information System Requirements, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1979) pp. 259-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boujon, M., Weick, K. & Binkhorst, D., Cognition in Organization: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra, Administrative Science Quarterly (1977) pp. 606-639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L.J. III & Brodwin, D.R., Strategic Implementation: Five Approaches to an Elusive Phenomenon, Strategic Management Journal (1984) pp. 241-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L., Strategy Formulation: A Social and Political Process, in Schendel, D.E. and Hofer, C.W. (eds) Strategic Management (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, D. & Lindblom, C.E., A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process (New York, NY: Free Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R., A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy, Academy of Management Review (1983) pp. 61-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., Strategy and Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. & March, J., Leadership and Ambiguity (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J. & Olsen, J., A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly (June 1972) pp. 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.J., Hayes, D.C. & Wolf, F., Accounting in Organized Anarchies: Understanding and Designing Accounting Systems in Ambiguous Situations, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1981) pp. 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L., Emergence of the Instrumental Organization, in Goodman, P.S. and Pennings, J.M. (eds) New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness pp. 50–62 (Washington: Jossey-Bass, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G., A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Transforming Organizations: The Key to Strategy is Context, Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R.B., The Organization as a Political System, Western Political Quarterly (1971) pp. 64-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermer, J. & Lucas, R., The Illusion of Managerial Control, Accounting, Organizations, and Society (1986) pp. 471-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, P., Reason in Society (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.R., Controls, Control and Management, in Bonini et al. (eds) Management Controls: New Directions in Basic Research pp. 286–296 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R., Designs for Organizational Control, in Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design (New York, NY: North Holland, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., Fahey, L. & Narayanan, V., Toward Understanding Strategic Issue Diagnosis, Strategic Management Journal (1983) pp. 307-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyckman, T., The Intelligence of Ambiguity, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1981) pp. 291-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York, NY: Free Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Euske, K.J., Management Control: Planning, Control, Measurement, and Evaluation (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. & Kazanjian, R.J., Strategy Implementation: Structure, Systems and Process (St Paul MN: West Publishing, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, P., The Goal Paradigm and Notes Toward a Counter Paradigm, Administrative Science Quarterly (1973) pp. 291-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, A., Authority, Power, Influence and Social Control: A Theoretical Synthesis, Academy of Management Review (1978) pp. 724-735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halal, W.E., The New Capitalism: Democratic Free Enterprise in Post-Industrial Society (New York: John Wiley, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.J. & Saias, M.A., Strategy Follows Structure!, Strategic Management Journal (1980) pp. 149-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, J. & Freeman, R., Structural inertia and organizational change, American Sociological Review (1984) pp. 149-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D.C., An Organizational Perspective on a Psycho-Technical Systems Perspective, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1980) pp. 43-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D.C., Accounting for Accounting: A Story About Managerial Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1983) pp. 241-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. & Jonsson, S., Designing Semi-Confusing Information Systems for Organizations in Changing Environments, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978) pp. 47-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P.C. & Starbuck, W.H., Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self Designing Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly (1976) pp. 41-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, C., Strategy Formulation: Issues and Concepts (St. Paul: West Publishing, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert, The Poverty of Management Control Philosophy, Academy of Management Review (July 1978) pp. 450-461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A.G., Toward an Organizational Perspective for the Study of Accounting and Information Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978) pp. 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horovitz, J., Strategic Control: A New Task for Top Management, Long Range Planning (June, 1979), pp. 2-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, A.M. & Baliga, B.R., Control Systems and Strategic Adaptation: Lessons from the Japanese Experience, Strategic Management Journal (1985) pp. 115-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M., Redundancy Rationality and the Problems of Duplication and Overlap, Public Administration Review (1969) pp. 336-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. & Stout, R., Jr., To Manage is Not to Control: Or the folly of type II errors, Public Administration Review (1979) pp. 148-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E., Still Muddling, Not Yet Through, Public Administration Review (1979) pp. 517-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P., Scott-Morton, M.F. & Ghostal, S., Strategic Control (St Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciariello, J.A. Management Control Systems (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentic-Hall, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I.C. & Guth, W.D., Strategy Implementation and Middle Management Coalitions, in Lamb, R. (ed.) Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 3, (Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I.C. & Jones, P.E., Strategy Formulation: Power and Politics (St Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., The Business Firm as a Political Coalition, Journal of Politics (1962) pp. 662-678.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice, International Studies of Management and Organization (1979) pp. 9-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. & Simon, H., Organizations (New York: John Wiley, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.O. & Mitroff, I.I., A Teleological Power-Oriented Theory of Strategy, in Lamb, R. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 2, pp 31–41 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K.A., Control in Business Organizations (Pitman, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Patterns in Strategv Formulation, Management Science (1978) pp. 934-948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J., On Strategies Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal (1985) pp. 25-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organizational Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly (1980) pp. 605-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, E.A., Jr., Strategic Choice as a Negotiated Outcome, Management Science (May, 1978) pp. 960-972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V.K. & Fahey, L., The Micro-politics of Strategy Formulation, Academy of Management Review (1982) pp. 25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., Management for Growth (New York: John Wiley, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M., Power in Societies (London: Macmillan, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D.T. & Berry, A.J., Control, Organization and Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1980) pp. 231-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. & Price, R.I., Hierarchies, Clans and Theory Z: A New Perspective on Organization and Development, Organizational Dynamics (1978) pp. 25-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., Management Systems: The Language of Organizational Character and Competence, Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1980) pp. 3-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.M., Strategy Formulation as a Political Process, International Studies of Management and Organization (1977) pp. 78-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., Power in Organizations (Boston, MA: Pitman, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G., The External Control of Organizations (New York: Harper and Row, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G., Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of the University Budget, Administrative Science Quarterly (1974) pp. 135-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L., Leadership as a Language Game, in McCall, M. and Lombardo, M. (eds), Leadership: Where else can we go? pp. 87–99 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Strategic Goals: Process and Politics, Sloan Management Review (1977) pp. 19, 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism, Sloan Management Review (1978) pp. 7-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Formulating Strategy One Step at a Time, Journal of Business Strategy (1981) pp. 42-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G.R. & Meindl, J.R., Corporate Attributions as Strategic Illusions of Management Control, Administrative Science Quarterly (June 1984) pp. 238-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E., The Semi-sovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W., Mitchell, T. & Perry, N., Organizational Governance, in Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design (New York: North Holland, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., Administrative behavior 3rd Edn (New York: Free Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., On the Concept of Goal, Administrative Science Quarterly (1964) pp. 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations, American Economic Review (1979) pp. 493-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, D., The Innovation Boundary, Administrative Science Quarterly (1971) pp. 515-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. & Hedberg, B., Saving an Organization from a Stagnation Environment, in Thorelli, H. (ed.) Strategy + Structure = Performance: The Strategic Planning Imperative (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonich, P.J. (ed.), Implementing Strategy (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Negotiations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A., Control in Organizations (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P., Accountability: The Neglected Social Context of Judgment and Choice, in Cummings, L. and Staw, B. (eds) Research in Organizational behavior Vol. 7 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G., The Ninth Wallberg Memorial Lecture, in Chen, G. et al. (eds) The General Theory of Systems Applied to Management and Organization pp. 107–114 (Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York: Free Press, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Enactment Processes in Organizations, in Staw, B. and Salancik, G. (eds), New Directions in Organizational behavior (Chicago, IL: St Clair Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., The Social Psychology of Organizing 2nd Edn (Reading, MA: Addison—Wesley, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., The Significance of Corporate Culture, in Frost, PJ. et al. (eds) Organizational Culture (1985) pp. 381-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A.B., The Political Economy of Efficiency, Public Administration Review (1966) pp. 292-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A., Policy Analyses Is What Information Systems Are Not, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978) pp. 77-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A., Economy and Environment/Rationality and Ritual: A Review Essay, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1976) pp. 117-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrapp, E., Good Managers don’t make Policy Decisions, Harvard Business Review (1967) pp. 91-98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dermer, J. (1988). Control and organizational order. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics