Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a field study aimed at providing a better understanding of how and why managers of corporations with multiple divisions set the levels of achievability of annual profit center budget targets. The data, gathered from 54 profit centers in 12 corporations, show that most budget targets are set to be achievable an average of eight or nine years out to ten. This finding contrasts with the prescription made in most management accounting textbooks suggesting that for optimum motivation budget targets should be achievable less than 50 percent of the time. Managers maintain, however, that these highly achievable targets provide considerable challenge, and the high achievability actually provides many advantages, including improved corporate reporting, resource planning, control, and, combined with other control system elements, even motivation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anthony, R.N., G.A. Welsch, and J.S. Reece, Fundamentals of Management Accounting, Fourth Edition (Richard D. Irwin, 1985).
Baiman, S., ‘Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Survey,’ Journal of Accounting Literature (Spring 1982), pp. 154-213.
Baker, G.P., M.C. Jensen, and K.J. Murphy, ‘Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory,’ Journal of Finance (July 1988), pp. 593-616.
Bandura, A., and D. Cervone,’ self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1983), pp. 1012-1028.
Barrett, M.E., and L.B. Fräser, III, ‘Conflicting Roles in Budgeting for Operations,’ Harvard Business Review (July-August 1977), pp. 137-146.
Chesley, G.R., ‘Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities: A Review,’ The Accounting Review (April 1975), pp. 325-337.
Chow, C.W., ‘The Effects of Job Standard Tightness and Compensation Scheme on Performance: An Exploration of Linkages,’ The Accounting Review (October 1983), pp. 667-685.
Cress, W., and J. Pettijohn, ‘A Survey of Budget-Related Planning and Control Policies and Procedures,’ Journal of Accounting Education (Fall 1985), pp. 61-78.
Demski, J.S., and G.A. Feltham, ‘Economic Incentives in Budgetary Control Systems,’ The Accounting Review (April 1978), pp. 336-359.
Dopuch, N., J.G. Birnberg, and J.S. Demski, Cost Accounting: Accounting Data for Management’s Decisions, Third Edition (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982).
Dunbar, R.L.M., ‘Budgeting for Control,’ Administrative Science Quarterly (March 1971), pp. 88-96.
Flamholtz, E.G., ‘Accounting, Budgeting, and Control Systems in Their Organizational Context: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 2/3 1983), pp. 153-169.
Garland, H., ‘Relation of Effort-Performance Expectancy to Performance in Goal-Setting Experiments,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (February 1984), pp. 79-84.
Hirst, M.K., ‘The Effects of Setting Budget Goals and Task Uncertainty on Performance: A Theoretical Analysis,’ The Accounting Review (October 1987), pp. 774-784.
Hofstede, G.H., The Game of Budget Control (Van Gorcum, 1967).
Hollenbeck, J.R., and H.J. Klein, ‘Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Problems, Prospects, and Proposals for Future Research,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (May 1987), pp. 212-220.
—, and C.R. Williams, ‘Goal Importance, Self-Focus, and the Goal-Setting Process,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (May 1987), pp. 204-211.
Holmstrom, B., ‘Moral Hazard and Observability,’ Bell Journal of Economics (Spring 1979), pp. 74-91.
Hopwood, A., Accounting and Human Behavior (Prentice-Hall, 1974).
Horngren, C.H., and G. Foster, Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, Seventh Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1987).
—, and G.L. Sundem, Introduction to Management Accounting, Seventh Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1987).
Huber, V.L., ‘Effects on Task Difficulty, Goal Setting, and Strategy on Performance of a Heuristic Task,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (August 1985), pp. 492-504.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,’ Journal of Financial Economics (October 1976), pp. 305-360.
Kanter, R.M., Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, 1977).
Kenis, I., ‘Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performances,’ The Accounting Review (October 1979), pp. 707-721.
Latham, G.P., and T.W. Lee, ‘Goal Setting,’ in E.A. Locke, Ed., Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (Lexington Books, 1986), pp. 101-117.
Lewin, K., T. Dembo, L. Festinger, and P.S. Sears, ‘Level of Aspiration,’ in J.M.V. Hunt, Ed., Personality and the Behavior Disorders (The Ronald Press Company, 1944), pp. 333-378.
Locke, E.A., G.P. Latham, and M. Erez, ‘The Determinants of Goal Commitment,’ Academy of Management Review (1988), pp. 23-39.
—, E. Frederick, C. Lee, and P. Bobko, ‘Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (May 1984), pp. 241-251.
—, K.N. Shaw, L.M. Saari, and G.P. Latham, ‘Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980,’ Psychological Bulletin (July 1981), pp. 125-152.
Longenecker, C.O., and D.A. Gioia, ‘Neglected at the Top — Executives Talk About Executive Appraisal,’ Sloan Management Review (Winter 1988), pp. 41-47.
Lowe, E.A., and R.W. Shaw, ‘An Analysis of Managerial Biasing: Evidence from a Company’s Budgeting Process,’ The Journal of Management Studies (October 1968), pp. 304-315.
Lukka, K., ‘Budgetary Biasing in Organizations: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 3, 1988), pp. 281-301.
Maccoby, M., The Gamesman: The New Corporate Leaders (Simon & Schuster, 1976).
Magee, R.P., Advanced Managerial Accounting (Harper & Row, 1986).
Matsui, T., A. Okada, and T. Kakuyama, ‘Influence of Achievement Need on
Goal Setting, Performance, and Feedback Effectiveness,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982), pp. 645-648.
Merchant, K.A., ‘Budgeting and the Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 2, 1985a), pp. 201-210.
—, ‘Organizational Controls and Discretionary Program Decision Making: A Field Study,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 1, 1985b), pp. 67-85.
—, ‘How and Why Firms Disregard the Controllability Principle,’ in W.J. Bruns, Jr., and R.S. Kaplan, Eds., Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives (Boston: Harvard Bus. School Press, 1987), pp. 316-338.
Mowen, J.C., R.D. Middlemist, and D. Luther, ‘Joint Effects of Assigned Goal Level and Incentive Structure on Task Performance: A Laboratory Study,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1981), pp. 538-603.
Onsi, M., ‘Factor Analysis of Behavioral Variables Affecting Budgetary Slack,’ The Accounting Review (July 1973), pp. 535-548.
Otley, D.T., Accounting Control and Organizational Behavior (William Heinemann Ltd., 1987).
—, ‘The Accuracy of Budgetary Estimates: Some Statistical Evidence,’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (Autumn 1985), pp. 415-428.
—, ‘Budgets and Managerial Motivation,’ Journal of General Management (Autumn 1982), pp. 26-42.
Reifenberg, R.J., ‘The Self-Serving Bias and the Use of Objective and Subjective Methods for Measuring Success and Failure,’ Journal of Social Psychology (October 1986), pp. 627-631.
Rockness, H.O., ‘Expectancy Theory in a Budgetary Setting: An Experimental Examination,’ The Accounting Review (October 1977), pp. 893-903.
Russell, D., and E. McAuley, ‘Causal Attributions, Causal Dimensions, and Affective Reactions to Success and Failure,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (June 1986), pp. 1174-1185.
Seidler, J., ‘On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis,’ American Sociological Review (December 1974), pp. 816-831.
Shillinglaw, G., Managerial Cost Accounting, Fifth Edition (Irwin, 1982).
Simons, R., ‘Analysis of the Organizational Characteristics Related to Tight Budget Goals,’ Contemporary Accounting Research (1988), forthcoming.
Stedry, A.C., Budget Control and Cost Behavior (Prentice-Hall, 1960).
—, and E. Kay, ‘The Effects of Goal Difficulty on Performance: A Field Experiment,’ Behavioral Science (November 1966), pp. 459-470.
Umapathy, S., Current Budgeting Practices in U.S. Industry: The State of the Art (Quorum, 1987).
Welsch, G.A., R.W. Hilton, and P.N. Gordon, Budgeting: Profit Planning and Control, Fifth Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merchant, K.A., Manzoni, JF. (1989). The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive