Skip to main content

Profit measurement in divisionalized companies

  • Chapter
Readings in Accounting for Management Control
  • 1797 Accesses

Abstract

The recent debate on the role of residual income in the measurement of divisional performance seems to be far from settled. There has been much discussion about the validity of including an interest element in the income calculation. It has been suggested that divisional income measurement should include interest on capital employed (or at least, some part thereof) to ensure that divisional managers are encouraged to operate with the optimal capital resources [21, 24]. However, Amey [2] argued that it is theoretically erroneous to deduct interest in the appraisal of operating decisions. Some attempts have been made to reconcile the arguments of both sides to the debate [8, 22, 23], but without much success [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amey, L.R., ‘Tomkins on “Residual Income”’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1975), pp. 55-68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amey, L.R., The Efficiency of Business Enterprises, George Allen and Unwin (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brechling, F., Investment and Employment Decisions, University of Manchester Press (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bromwich, M., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance: A Comment and an Extension’, Accounting and Business Research (Spring, 1973), pp. 123-132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carsberg, B.V., ‘On the Linear Programming Approach to Asset Valuation’, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, 1969), pp. 165-182.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, Doris M., ‘The Effect of Frequency of Feedback on Attitudes and Performance’, Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement to Vol. 5 (1967), pp. 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Division Financial Executives, Studies in Business Policy, No. 101, New York National Industrial Conference Board (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emmanuel, C.R. and D.T. Otley, ‘The Usefulness of Residual Income’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Winter, 1976), pp. 43-51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flower, J.F., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance’, Accounting and Business Research (Summer, 1971), pp. 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon, M.J. and P.J. Halpern, ‘Cost of Capital for a Division of a Firm’, Journal of Finance (September, 1974), pp. 1153-1164.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson, Bruce D. and John Dearden, ‘New System for Divisional Control’, Harvard Business Review (September–October, 1966), pp. 144-160.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirchleifer, J., ‘On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 66 (August, 1958), pp. 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofstede, G.H., The Game of Budget Control, Tavistock (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarrett, J.E., ‘Estimating the Cost of Capital for a Division of a Firm, and the Allocation Problem in Accounting’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1978), pp. 39-47.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Theory of Investment Behaviour’, Determinants of Investment Behaviour, Universities National Bureau Conference Series No. 18 (1967), pp. 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Anticipations and Investment Behaviour’, The Brookings Quarter Econometric Model of the United States, eds. J.S. Duesenbury, et al. (1965), pp. 35-92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Capital Theory and Investment Behaviour’, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, Papers and Proceedings (May, 1963), pp. 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mauriel, J. and R.N. Anthony, ‘Misevaluation of Investment Centre Performance’, Harvard Business Review (March–April, 1966), pp. 98-105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sandilands Committee, Report of the Inflation Accounting Committee, Cmnd. 6225, HMSO (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scapens, Robert W., ‘A Neoclassical Measure of Profit’, Accounting Review (April, 1978), pp. 448-469.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Solomons, David, Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control, Irwin (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tomkins, C.R., ‘Another Look at Residual Income’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1975), pp. 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tomkins, C.R., ‘Residual Income — A Rebuttal of Professor Amey’s Arguments’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Summer, 1975), pp. 161-168.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tomkins, C.R., Financial Planning in Divisionalised Companies, Haymarket (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scapens, R.W. (1979). Profit measurement in divisionalized companies. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics