Advertisement

Profit measurement in divisionalized companies

  • Robert W. Scapens

Abstract

The recent debate on the role of residual income in the measurement of divisional performance seems to be far from settled. There has been much discussion about the validity of including an interest element in the income calculation. It has been suggested that divisional income measurement should include interest on capital employed (or at least, some part thereof) to ensure that divisional managers are encouraged to operate with the optimal capital resources [21, 24]. However, Amey [2] argued that it is theoretically erroneous to deduct interest in the appraisal of operating decisions. Some attempts have been made to reconcile the arguments of both sides to the debate [8, 22, 23], but without much success [1].

Keywords

Cash Flow Adjustment Cost Shadow Price Capital Asset Marginal Revenue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amey, L.R., ‘Tomkins on “Residual Income”’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1975), pp. 55-68.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amey, L.R., The Efficiency of Business Enterprises, George Allen and Unwin (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brechling, F., Investment and Employment Decisions, University of Manchester Press (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bromwich, M., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance: A Comment and an Extension’, Accounting and Business Research (Spring, 1973), pp. 123-132.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carsberg, B.V., ‘On the Linear Programming Approach to Asset Valuation’, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, 1969), pp. 165-182.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, Doris M., ‘The Effect of Frequency of Feedback on Attitudes and Performance’, Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement to Vol. 5 (1967), pp. 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Division Financial Executives, Studies in Business Policy, No. 101, New York National Industrial Conference Board (1961).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emmanuel, C.R. and D.T. Otley, ‘The Usefulness of Residual Income’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Winter, 1976), pp. 43-51.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flower, J.F., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance’, Accounting and Business Research (Summer, 1971), pp. 205-214.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon, M.J. and P.J. Halpern, ‘Cost of Capital for a Division of a Firm’, Journal of Finance (September, 1974), pp. 1153-1164.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson, Bruce D. and John Dearden, ‘New System for Divisional Control’, Harvard Business Review (September–October, 1966), pp. 144-160.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirchleifer, J., ‘On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 66 (August, 1958), pp. 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofstede, G.H., The Game of Budget Control, Tavistock (1969).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarrett, J.E., ‘Estimating the Cost of Capital for a Division of a Firm, and the Allocation Problem in Accounting’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1978), pp. 39-47.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Theory of Investment Behaviour’, Determinants of Investment Behaviour, Universities National Bureau Conference Series No. 18 (1967), pp. 129–155.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Anticipations and Investment Behaviour’, The Brookings Quarter Econometric Model of the United States, eds. J.S. Duesenbury, et al. (1965), pp. 35-92.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jorgenson, D.W., ‘Capital Theory and Investment Behaviour’, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, Papers and Proceedings (May, 1963), pp. 247–257.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mauriel, J. and R.N. Anthony, ‘Misevaluation of Investment Centre Performance’, Harvard Business Review (March–April, 1966), pp. 98-105.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandilands Committee, Report of the Inflation Accounting Committee, Cmnd. 6225, HMSO (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scapens, Robert W., ‘A Neoclassical Measure of Profit’, Accounting Review (April, 1978), pp. 448-469.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solomons, David, Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control, Irwin (1965).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tomkins, C.R., ‘Another Look at Residual Income’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring, 1975), pp. 39-53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomkins, C.R., ‘Residual Income — A Rebuttal of Professor Amey’s Arguments’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Summer, 1975), pp. 161-168.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomkins, C.R., Financial Planning in Divisionalised Companies, Haymarket (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Scapens
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations