Advertisement

Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure

  • Richard E. Caves

Abstract

Let us start with a sketch of the relationships to be surveyed in this paper. The large firm sells1 in product markets having structural features that constrain its behaviour and define its options. ‘Market structure’ refers to certain stable attributes of the market that influence the firm’s conduct in the marketplace. Significant elements of market structure include the number and size distribution of sellers and buyers, height of barriers to entry and exit, extent and character of product differentiation, extent and character of international competition (if the market is defined no more broadly than the nation), and certain parameters of demand (elasticity, growth rate). The firm holds tangible or intangible semi-fixed assets or skills. The top managers’ perceptions of the market structure and the firm’s strengths and weaknesses jointly determine their choice of corporate strategy (its long-run plan for profit maximization) and organizational structure (the internal allocation of tasks, decision rules, and procedures for appraisal and reward, selected for the best pursuit of that strategy). Both corporate strategy and organizational structure influence the economic performance of the firm and the market in which it sells.2

Keywords

Industrial Organization Market Structure Organizational Design Business Organization Strategic Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, Derek F. Defining the business: The starting point of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Aharoni, Yair. The foreign investment decision process. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. Alchian, Armen A. and Demsetz, Harold. ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,’ Amer. Econ. Rev., Dec. 1972, 62(5), pp. 777–95.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, Howard E. ‘Technology and Organizational Structure: A Reexamination of the Findings of the Aston Group,’ Admin. Science Q., March 1972, 17(1), pp. 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alford, Bernard W.E. ‘The Chandler Thesis — Some General Observations,’ in Hannah, Leslie, ed. (1976), pp. 52-70.Google Scholar
  6. Allen, Michael Patrick. ‘The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates,’ Amer. Soc. Rev., June 1974, 39(3), pp. 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen, Stephen A. ‘Organizational Choices and General Management Influence Networks in Divisionalized Companies,’ Acad. Management J., Sept. 1978, 21(3), pp. 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews, Kenneth R. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. Ansoff, H. Igor. Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Armour, Henry Ogden and Teece, David J. ‘Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis,’ Bell J. Econ., Spring 1978, 9(1), pp. 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, Peter M., et al. ‘Technology and Organization in Manufacturing,’ Admin. Science Quart, March 1976, 21(1), pp. 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bower, Joseph L. Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1970[a].Google Scholar
  13. —. ‘Planning within the Firm,’ Amer. Econ. Rev., May 1970[b], 60(2), pp. 186–94.Google Scholar
  14. Buckley, Peter J. and Casson, Mark. The future of the multinational enterprise. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Burns, Tom and Stalker, G.M. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. Calvo, Guillermo A. and Wellisz, Stanislaw. ‘Supervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimum Size of the Firm’, J. Polit. Econ., Oct. 1978, 86(5), pp. 943–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caves, Richard E.; Porter, Michael E. and Spence, Michael. Competition in the open economy: A model applied to Canada. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  19. —. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Channon, Derek F. The strategy and structure of British enterprise. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. Child, John. ‘Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study,’ Admin. Science Quart., June 1972, 72(2), pp. 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cyert, Richard M. and March, James G. A behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, Stanley M. and Lawrence, Paul R. Matrix. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Dill, William R. ‘Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy,’ Admin. Science Quart., 1958, 2, pp. 409–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Downey, W. Kirk, Hellriegel, Don and Slocum, John W., Jr. ‘Environmental Uncertainty: The Construct and Its Applications,’ Admin. Science Quart., Dec. 1975, 20(4), pp. 613–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DuBick, Michael A. ‘The Organizational Structure of Newspapers in Relation to Their Metropolitan Environments,’ Admin. Sciencxe Quart., Sept. 1978, 23(3), pp. 418–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyas, Gareth P. The strategy and structure of French industrial enterprise. Unpublished D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1972.Google Scholar
  28. —— and Thanheiser, Heinz T. The emerging European enterprise: Strategy and structure in French and German industry. London: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. Edström, Anders and Galbraith, Jay R. ‘Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations,’ Admin. Science Quart., June 1977, 22(2), pp. 248–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Franko, Lawrence G. Joint venture survival in multinational corporations. New York: Praeger, 1971.Google Scholar
  31. —. The European multinationals: A renewed challenge to American and British big business. Stamford, Conn.: Greylock, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. Galbraith, John Kenneth. The new industrial state. Second edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, [1967] 1971.Google Scholar
  33. Grabowski, Henry G. and Mueller, Dennis C. ‘Life-Cycle Effects on Corporate Returns on Retentions,’ Rev. Econ. Statist., Nov. 1975, 57(4), pp. 400–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hannah, Leslie, ed. Management strategy and business development: An historical and comparative study. London: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Harvey, Edward. ‘Technology and the Structure of Organizations,’ Amer. Soc. Rev., April 1968, 33(2), pp. 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horst, Thomas. At home abroad: A study of the domestic and foreign operations of the American food-processing industry. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger, 1974.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, Michael S. Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960–1970. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. Imai, Ken’ichi. ‘Japan’s Industrial Organization,’ Japanese Econ. Studies, Spring-Summer 1978, 6(3–4), pp. 3–67.Google Scholar
  39. Inkson, J.H.K., et al. ‘A Comparison of Organization Structure and Managerial Roles: Ohio, U.S.A., and the Midlands, England,’ J. Management Stud., Oct. 1970, 7(3), pp. 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, Robert T.; Slocum, John W., Jr. and Susman, Gerald I. ‘Uncertainty and Type of Management System in Continuous Process Organizations,’ Acad. Management J., March 1974, 17(1), pp. 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khandwalla, Pradip N. ‘Effect of Competition on the Structure of Top Management Control,’ Acad. Management J., June 1973[a], 16(2), pp. 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. —. ‘Viable and Effective Organizational Designs of Firms,’ Acad. Management J., Sept. 1973[b], 16(3), pp. 481–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kimberly, John R. ‘Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique and Proposal,’ Admin. Science Quart., Dec. 1976, 21(4), pp. 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kynaston Reeves, Tom and Turner, Barry A. ‘A Theory of Organization and Behavior in Batch Production Factories,’ Admin. Science Quart., March 1972, 17(1), pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lawrence, Paul R. and Lorsch, Jay W. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1967.Google Scholar
  46. Leibenstein, Harvey. Beyond economic man: A new foundation for microeconomics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  47. Lorsch, Jay W. and Allen, Stephen A., III. Managing diversity and interdependence: An organizational study of multidivisional firms. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1973.Google Scholar
  48. Markham, Jesse W. Conglomerate enterprise and public policy. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration. Harvard University, 1973.Google Scholar
  49. Marschak, Jakob and Radner, Roy. Economic theory of teams. Cowles Foundation Monograph No. 22. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  50. McArthur, John H. and Scott, Bruce R. Industrial planning in France. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1969.Google Scholar
  51. McMillan, Charles J., et al. ‘The Structure of Work Organization across Societies,’ Acad Management J., Dec. 1973, 16(4), pp. 555–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mirrlees, James A. ‘The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority within an Organization,’ Bell J. Econ., Spring 1976, 7(1), pp. 105–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mueller, Dennis C. ‘A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm,’ J. Ind. Econ., July 1972, 20(3), pp. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murthy, K.R. Srinivasa. Corporate strategy and top executive compensation. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1974.Google Scholar
  55. Negandhi, Anant R. and Reimann, Bernard C. ‘Correlates of Decentralization: Closed and Open Systems Perspective,’ Acad. Management J., Dec. 1973, 16(4), pp. 570–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newman, Howard H. ‘Strategic Groups and the Structure-Performance Relationship,’ Rev. Econ. Statist., August 1978, 60(3), pp. 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ouchi, William G. ‘The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control,’ Admin. Science Quart., March 1977, 22(1), pp. 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. —. ‘The Transmission of Control through Organizational Hierarchy,’ Acad. Management J., June 1978, 21(2), pp. 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pavan, Robert J. The strategy and structure of Italian enterprise. Unpublished D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1972.Google Scholar
  60. Pennings, Johannes M. ‘The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness,’ Admin. Science Quart., Sept. 1975, 20(3), pp. 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. —. ‘Dimensions of Organizational Influence and Their Effectiveness Correlates.’ Admin. Science Quart., Dec. 1976, 21(4), pp. 688–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. —. ‘Structural Correlates of the Environment,’ in Strategy + structure = performance: The strategic planning imperative. Edited by Hans B. Thorelli. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1977, pp. 260–76.Google Scholar
  63. Penrose, Edith T. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959.Google Scholar
  64. Pfeffer, Jeffrey. ‘Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and Its Environment,’ Admin. Science Quart., June 1972, 17(2), pp. 218–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. —— and Leblebici, Huseyin. ‘The Effect of Competition on Some Dimensions of Organizational Structure,’ Social Forces, Dec. 1973, 52(2), pp. 268–79.Google Scholar
  66. —— and Salancik, Gerald R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar
  67. Porter, Michael E. ‘The Structure within Industries and Companies’ Performance,’ Rev. Econ. Statist., May 1979, 61(2), pp. 214–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Proctor, Michael S. ‘Production, Investment, and Idle Capacity,’ Southern Econ. J., July 1976, 43(1), pp. 855–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pugh, D.S., et al. ‘The Context of Organization Structures,’ Admin. Science Quart., March 1969, 14(1), pp. 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rubin, Paul H. ‘The Expansion of Firms,’ J. Polit. Econ., July–August 1973, 81(4), pp. 936–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rumelt, Richard P. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1974.Google Scholar
  72. —. ‘Diversity and Profitability,’ Paper MGL-51, Managerial Studies Center, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 1977.Google Scholar
  73. Scott, Bruce R. ‘The Industrial State: Old Myths and New Realities,’ Harvard Bus. Rev., March–April 1973, 51(2), pp. 133–48.Google Scholar
  74. Simonetti, Jack L. and Boseman, F. Glenn. ‘The Impact of Market Competition on Organization Structure and Effectiveness: A Cross-Cultural Study,’ Acad. Management J., Sept. 1975, 18(3), pp. 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Steer, Peter S. and Cable, John R. ‘Internal Organization and Profit: An Empirical Analysis of Large U.K. Companies,’ J. Ind. Econ., Sept. 1978, 27(1), pp. 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Steiner, Peter O. Mergers: Motives, effects, policies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  77. Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘Incentives, Risk, and Information: Notes Towards a Theory of Hierarchy,’ Bell J. Econ., Autumn 1975, 6(2), pp. 552–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stopford, John M. and Wells, Louis T., Jr. Managing the multinational enterprise: Organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  79. Thanheiser, Heinz T. Strategy and structure of German industrial enterprise. Unpublished D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1972.Google Scholar
  80. Thompson, James D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  81. Vancil, Richard F. Decentralization: Managerial ambiguity by design. New York: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1979.Google Scholar
  82. Wilkins, Mira. The emergence of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from the colonial era to 1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  83. Williamson, Oliver E. ‘Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size,’ J. Polit. Econ., April 1967, 75(2), pp. 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. —. Corporate control and business behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  85. —. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  86. —— and Bhargava, Narottam. ‘Assessing and Classifying the Internal Structure and Control Apparatus of the Modern Corporation’ in Market structure and corporate behaviour. Edited by Keith Cowling. London: Gray-Mills, 1972, pp. 125–49.Google Scholar
  87. —— Wächter, Michael L. and Harris, Jeffrey E, ‘Understanding the Employment Relation: The Analysis of Idiosyncratic Exchange,’ Bell J. Econ., Spring 1975, 6(1), pp. 250–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woodward, Joan. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  89. Woodward, Joan —, ed. Industrial organization: Behaviour and control. London: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  90. Wrigley, Leonard. Divisional autonomy and diversification. Unpublished D.B.A. thesis, Harvard Business School, 1970.Google Scholar
  91. —. ‘Conglomerate Growth in Canada,’ brief prepared for Royal Commission on Corporate Concentration. Mimeographed. London, Ontario: School of Business Administration, University of Western Ontario, 1976.Google Scholar
  92. Zwerman, William L. New perspectives on organization theory. Contributions in Sociology, No. 1. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Caves
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations